From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, mkl@pengutronix.de,
aurelien@aurel32.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/6] RISC-V: Remove the unimplemented ISA extensions
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 22:00:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220402050041.21302-4-palmer@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220402050041.21302-1-palmer@rivosinc.com>
This made sense when we die()d on unknown ISA extensions, but now that
we're just warning it's actually a bit detrimental: users won't see that
their unimplemented ISA extensions are silently having the wrong
definitions set, which may cause hard to debug failures.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
---
target-riscv.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-riscv.c b/target-riscv.c
index 494c08db..924259af 100644
--- a/target-riscv.c
+++ b/target-riscv.c
@@ -37,17 +37,7 @@ static void parse_march_riscv(const char *arg)
{ "f", RISCV_FLOAT|RISCV_FDIV },
{ "d", RISCV_DOUBLE|RISCV_FDIV },
{ "g", RISCV_GENERIC },
- { "q", 0 },
- { "l", 0 },
{ "c", RISCV_COMP },
- { "b", 0 },
- { "j", 0 },
- { "t", 0 },
- { "p", 0 },
- { "v", 0 },
- { "n", 0 },
- { "h", 0 },
- { "s", 0 },
};
int i;
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, mkl@pengutronix.de,
aurelien@aurel32.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/6] RISC-V: Remove the unimplemented ISA extensions
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 22:00:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220402050041.21302-4-palmer@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220402050041.21302-1-palmer@rivosinc.com>
This made sense when we die()d on unknown ISA extensions, but now that
we're just warning it's actually a bit detrimental: users won't see that
their unimplemented ISA extensions are silently having the wrong
definitions set, which may cause hard to debug failures.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
---
target-riscv.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-riscv.c b/target-riscv.c
index 494c08db..924259af 100644
--- a/target-riscv.c
+++ b/target-riscv.c
@@ -37,17 +37,7 @@ static void parse_march_riscv(const char *arg)
{ "f", RISCV_FLOAT|RISCV_FDIV },
{ "d", RISCV_DOUBLE|RISCV_FDIV },
{ "g", RISCV_GENERIC },
- { "q", 0 },
- { "l", 0 },
{ "c", RISCV_COMP },
- { "b", 0 },
- { "j", 0 },
- { "t", 0 },
- { "p", 0 },
- { "v", 0 },
- { "n", 0 },
- { "h", 0 },
- { "s", 0 },
};
int i;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-02 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-02 5:00 [PATCH v1 0/6] RISC-V -march handling improvements Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-02 5:00 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-02 5:00 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] RISC-V: Respect -Wsparse-error for -march errors Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-02 5:00 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-05-21 21:46 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-05-21 21:46 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-04-02 5:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] RISC-V: Match GCC's semantics for multiple -march instances Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-02 5:00 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-05-21 21:52 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-05-21 21:52 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-04-02 5:00 ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]
2022-04-02 5:00 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] RISC-V: Remove the unimplemented ISA extensions Palmer Dabbelt
2022-05-21 22:05 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-05-21 22:05 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-04-02 5:00 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] RISC-V: Remove "g" from the extension list Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-02 5:00 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-02 5:00 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] RISC-V: Add the Zicsr extension Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-02 5:00 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-02 5:00 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] RISC-V: Add the Zifencei extension Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-02 5:00 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-04 17:52 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] RISC-V -march handling improvements Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-04-04 17:52 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-04-04 23:15 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-04-04 23:15 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-05-21 21:23 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-05-21 21:23 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-07-05 23:09 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-07-05 23:09 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220402050041.21302-4-palmer@rivosinc.com \
--to=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.