All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/11] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:47:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220629074725.2331441-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220629074725.2331441-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

The iommu->lock is used to protect the per-IOMMU domain ID resource.
Moving the lock into the ID alloc/free helpers makes the code more
compact. At the same time, the device_domain_lock is irrelevant to
the domain ID resource, remove its assertion as well.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index a81bdddf1091..5681b8ef11f1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -1781,16 +1781,13 @@ static struct dmar_domain *alloc_domain(unsigned int type)
 	return domain;
 }
 
-/* Must be called with iommu->lock */
 static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 			       struct intel_iommu *iommu)
 {
 	unsigned long ndomains;
-	int num;
-
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-	assert_spin_locked(&iommu->lock);
+	int num, ret = 0;
 
+	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] += 1;
 	if (domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] == 1) {
 		ndomains = cap_ndoms(iommu->cap);
@@ -1799,7 +1796,8 @@ static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 		if (num >= ndomains) {
 			pr_err("%s: No free domain ids\n", iommu->name);
 			domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] -= 1;
-			return -ENOSPC;
+			ret = -ENOSPC;
+			goto out_unlock;
 		}
 
 		set_bit(num, iommu->domain_ids);
@@ -1808,7 +1806,9 @@ static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 		domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+out_unlock:
+	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
@@ -1816,9 +1816,7 @@ static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 {
 	int num;
 
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-	assert_spin_locked(&iommu->lock);
-
+	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] -= 1;
 	if (domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] == 0) {
 		num = domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id];
@@ -1826,6 +1824,7 @@ static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 		domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
 		domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id] = 0;
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 }
 
 static inline int guestwidth_to_adjustwidth(int gaw)
@@ -2477,9 +2476,7 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
 	info->domain = domain;
-	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	ret = domain_attach_iommu(domain, iommu);
-	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 	if (ret) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
 		return ret;
@@ -4183,10 +4180,7 @@ static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info)
 	}
 
 	list_del(&info->link);
-
-	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
-	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 }
 
 static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/11] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:47:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220629074725.2331441-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20220629074720.bVOLL970uhe7zmunc5ogTgpZxCcHagpxLSCrMxaui-g@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220629074725.2331441-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

The iommu->lock is used to protect the per-IOMMU domain ID resource.
Moving the lock into the ID alloc/free helpers makes the code more
compact. At the same time, the device_domain_lock is irrelevant to
the domain ID resource, remove its assertion as well.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index a81bdddf1091..5681b8ef11f1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -1781,16 +1781,13 @@ static struct dmar_domain *alloc_domain(unsigned int type)
 	return domain;
 }
 
-/* Must be called with iommu->lock */
 static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 			       struct intel_iommu *iommu)
 {
 	unsigned long ndomains;
-	int num;
-
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-	assert_spin_locked(&iommu->lock);
+	int num, ret = 0;
 
+	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] += 1;
 	if (domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] == 1) {
 		ndomains = cap_ndoms(iommu->cap);
@@ -1799,7 +1796,8 @@ static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 		if (num >= ndomains) {
 			pr_err("%s: No free domain ids\n", iommu->name);
 			domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] -= 1;
-			return -ENOSPC;
+			ret = -ENOSPC;
+			goto out_unlock;
 		}
 
 		set_bit(num, iommu->domain_ids);
@@ -1808,7 +1806,9 @@ static int domain_attach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 		domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+out_unlock:
+	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
@@ -1816,9 +1816,7 @@ static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 {
 	int num;
 
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-	assert_spin_locked(&iommu->lock);
-
+	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] -= 1;
 	if (domain->iommu_refcnt[iommu->seq_id] == 0) {
 		num = domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id];
@@ -1826,6 +1824,7 @@ static void domain_detach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 		domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
 		domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id] = 0;
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 }
 
 static inline int guestwidth_to_adjustwidth(int gaw)
@@ -2477,9 +2476,7 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
 	info->domain = domain;
-	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	ret = domain_attach_iommu(domain, iommu);
-	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 	if (ret) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
 		return ret;
@@ -4183,10 +4180,7 @@ static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info)
 	}
 
 	list_del(&info->link);
-
-	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
 	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
-	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 }
 
 static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-29  7:47 [PATCH v3 00/11] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47 ` Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Remove device_domain_lock usage Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-07-01  7:55   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  7:55     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] iommu/vt-d: Remove clearing translation data in disable_dmar_iommu() Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-07-01  7:58   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  7:58     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-03  4:34     ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-03  4:34       ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-07  1:02       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] iommu/vt-d: Use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() in pgtable_walk() Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Unnecessary spinlock for root table alloc and free Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] iommu/vt-d: Replace spin_lock_irqsave() with spin_lock() Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-06-29  7:47   ` [PATCH v3 06/11] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-07-01  8:06   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  8:06     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in pasid manipulation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into its caller Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-07-01  8:08   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  8:08     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] iommu/vt-d: Use device_domain_lock accurately Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-07-01  8:15   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  8:15     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  9:12     ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-01  9:12       ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-03  4:35     ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-03  4:35       ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-29  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] iommu/vt-d: Convert global spinlock into per domain lock Lu Baolu
2022-06-29  7:47   ` Lu Baolu
2022-07-01  8:18   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  8:18     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  7:53 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  7:53   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  8:12   ` Baolu Lu
2022-07-01  8:12     ` Baolu Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220629074725.2331441-7-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.