From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 0/7] CXL: Read CDAT
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:21:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220719162145.000054bc@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715030424.462963-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:04:17 -0700
ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>
> Details of changes are in the individual patches.
>
> Major changes from V13:[10]
> Dan minor updates
> Willy's suggestion of documentation is good but I'm deferring it until
> we get the location of the PCI mailboxes settled.
> Drop retry CDAT patch
> Drop DSMAS patch
> Rebased on latest cxl-pending
>
> CXL drivers need various data which are provided through generic DOE mailboxes
> as defined in the PCIe 6.0 spec.[1]
>
> One such data is the Coherent Device Attribute Table (CDAT). CDAT data provides
> coherent information about the various devices in the system. It was developed
> because systems no longer have a priori knowledge of all coherent devices
> within a system. CDAT describes the coherent characteristics of the
> components on the CXL bus separate from system configurations. The OS can
> then, for example, use this information to form correct interleave sets.
>
> To begin reading the CDAT the OS must have support to access the DOE mailboxes
> provided by the CXL devices.
>
> Because DOE is not specific to DOE but is provided within the PCI spec, the
> series adds PCI DOE capability library functions. These functions allow for
> the iteration of the DOE capabilities on a device as well as creating
> pci_doe_mb structures which can control the operation of the DOE state machine.
>
> For now the iteration of and storage of the DOE mailboxes is done on memdev
> objects within the CXL stack. When this is needed in more generic code this
> can be lifted later.
>
> This work was tested using qemu.
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20211105235056.3711389-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> [1] https://pcisig.com/specifications
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210202005948.241655-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220201071952.900068-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220330235920.2800929-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220414203237.2198665-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> [6] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220531152632.1397976-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> [7] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220605005049.2155874-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> [8] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220610202259.3544623-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> [9] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220628041527.742333-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
> [10] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20220705154932.2141021-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
>
>
> Previous changes
> ================
>
> Changes from V12:[9]
> A couple of bug fixes in the new XArray stuff
> Remove the IRQ support because I did not realize how that worked and it
> was complicating things.
> Remove busy retries and replace with an error as there is no good way
> to ensure it will work.
This is fine for userspace access, but I think we probably will want retries
once we are using it in kernel. Whilst we'd not expect it to be common as
per (very late) reply I sent to v13 discussion, the CDAT table can change
all on it's own (as far as software can see). I'd expect it to be a once in
a blue moon thing though.
> Other code clean ups mentioned in the individual patches.
>
> Changes from V11:[8]
> The major change in this version is to remove the workqueue from the
> internal implementation of the state machine. A single ordered
> workqueue within each mailbox processes tasks submitted. This
> workqueue takes care of all locking and guarantees that tasks are
> completed in the order submitted. Any synchronization which is
> required between tasks will need to be handled by the user of the
> mailbox. However, the user can depend on work items being completed in
> the order they are submitted. So a single thread submitter is
> guaranteed to get all work items completed in order. This also aids in
> the support of a single mailbox supporting multiple protocols. Each
> protocol could have a separate thread submitting tasks for that
> protocol. The mailbox object will ensure that each protocol task is
> complete before another task starts. But multiple user threads can be
> submitting tasks for different protocols all at the same time without
> regard to other protocols being used.
>
> XArrays are used throughout the series.
>
> Other minor changes are noted in the individual patches.
>
> Changes from V10:[7]
> Address Ben Widawsky's comments
> Protect against potentially malicious devices.
> Fix ownership issue of cdat_mb
>
> Changes from V9:[6]
> Address feedback from
> Lukas Wunner, Davidlohr Bueso, Jonathan Cameron,
> Alison Schofield, and Ben Widawsky
> Details in each individual patch.
>
> Changes from V8:[5]
> For this version I've punted a bit to get it out and drop the auxiliary
> bus functionality. I like where Jonathan is going with the port driver
> idea. I think eventually the irq/mailbox creation will need to be more
> generic in a PCI port driver. I've modeled this version on such an
> architecture but used the CXL port for the time being.
>
> From Dan
> Drop the auxiliary bus/device
> From Jonathan
> Cleanups
> From Bjorn
> Clean up commit messages
> move pci-doe.c to doe.c
> Clean up PCI spec references
> Ensure all messages use pci_*()
> Add offset to error messages to distinguish mailboxes
> use hex for DOE offsets
> Print 4 nibbles for Vendor ID and 2 for type.
> s/irq/IRQ in comments
> Fix long lines
> Fix typos
>
>
> Changes from V7:[4]
> Avoid code bloat by making pci-doe.c conditional on CONFIG_PCI_DOE
> which is auto selected by the CXL_PCI config option.
> Minor code clean ups
> Fix bug in pci_doe_supports_prot()
> Rebase to cxl-pending
>
> Changes from V6:[3]
> The big change is the removal of the auxiliary bus code from the PCI
> layer. The auxiliary bus usage is now in the CXL layer. The PCI layer
> provides helpers for subsystems to utilize DOE mailboxes by creating a
> pci_doe_mb object which controls a state machine for that mailbox
> capability. The CXL layer wraps this object in an auxiliary device and
> driver which can then be used to determine if the kernel is controlling
> the capability or it is available to be used by user space. Reads from
> user space via lspci are allowed. Writes are allowed but flagged via a
> tainting the kernel.
>
> Feedback from Bjorn, Jonathan, and Dan
> Details in each patch
>
> Changes from V5:[0]
>
> Rework the patch set to split PCI vs CXL changes
> Also make each change a bit more stand alone for easier review
> Add cxl_cdat structure
> Put CDAT related data structures in cdat.h
> Clarify some device lifetimes with comments
> Incorporate feedback from Jonathan, Bjorn and Dan
> The bigest change is placing the DOE scanning code into the
> pci_doe driver (part of the PCI codre).
> Validate the CDAT when it is read rather than before DSMAS
> parsing
> Do not report DSMAS failure as an error, report a warning and
> keep going.
> Retry reading the table 1 time.
> Update commit messages and this cover letter
>
>
>
> Ira Weiny (5):
> PCI: Replace magic constant for PCI Sig Vendor ID
> cxl/pci: Create PCI DOE mailbox's for memory devices
> driver-core: Introduce BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW}
> cxl/port: Read CDAT table
> cxl/port: Introduce cxl_cdat_valid()
>
> Jonathan Cameron (2):
> PCI: Add vendor ID for the PCI SIG
> PCI/DOE: Add DOE mailbox support functions
>
> .clang-format | 1 +
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-cxl | 10 +
> drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/cdat.h | 63 +++
> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 206 +++++++++
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 5 +
> drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 3 +
> drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/pci.c | 44 ++
> drivers/cxl/port.c | 54 +++
> drivers/pci/Kconfig | 3 +
> drivers/pci/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pci/doe.c | 546 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/pci-doe.h | 79 ++++
> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 +
> include/linux/sysfs.h | 16 +
> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 29 +-
> 18 files changed, 1063 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cxl/cdat.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/doe.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/pci-doe.h
>
>
> base-commit: b060edfd8cdd52bc8648392500bf152a8dd6d4c5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-19 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-15 3:04 [PATCH V14 0/7] CXL: Read CDAT ira.weiny
2022-07-15 3:04 ` [PATCH V14 1/7] PCI: Add vendor ID for the PCI SIG ira.weiny
2022-07-15 3:04 ` [PATCH V14 2/7] PCI: Replace magic constant for PCI Sig Vendor ID ira.weiny
2022-07-15 3:04 ` [PATCH V14 3/7] PCI/DOE: Add DOE mailbox support functions ira.weiny
2022-07-19 16:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-19 19:16 ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-19 19:50 ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-20 11:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-15 3:04 ` [PATCH V14 4/7] cxl/pci: Create PCI DOE mailbox's for memory devices ira.weiny
2022-07-19 16:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-15 3:04 ` [PATCH V14 5/7] driver-core: Introduce BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW} ira.weiny
2022-07-19 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-15 3:04 ` [PATCH V14 6/7] cxl/port: Read CDAT table ira.weiny
2022-07-16 3:27 ` Dan Williams
2022-07-19 1:19 ` Dan Williams
2022-07-19 1:55 ` [PATCH v15 " Dan Williams
2022-07-19 16:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-19 19:26 ` Dan Williams
2022-07-15 3:04 ` [PATCH V14 7/7] cxl/port: Introduce cxl_cdat_valid() ira.weiny
2022-07-16 2:26 ` Dan Williams
2022-07-19 16:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-19 15:21 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2022-07-19 19:23 ` [PATCH V14 0/7] CXL: Read CDAT Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220719162145.000054bc@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.