Re: [PATCH v1 07/16] ufs: core: mcq: Allocate memory for mcq mode

From: Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>, <quic_xiaosenh@quicinc.com>,
	<quic_cang@quicinc.com>, <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com>,
	<quic_rampraka@quicinc.com>, <quic_richardp@quicinc.com>,
	<stanley.chu@mediatek.com>, <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	<bvanassche@acm.org>, <avri.altman@wdc.com>, <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/16] ufs: core: mcq: Allocate memory for mcq mode
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 13:25:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221003202551.GA25671@asutoshd-linux1.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220926154532.GH101994@thinkpad>

On Mon, Sep 26 2022 at 08:46 -0700, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:05:14PM -0700, Asutosh Das wrote:
>> To read the bqueuedepth, the device descriptor is fetched
>> in Single Doorbell Mode. This allocated memory may not be
>> enough for MCQ mode because the number of tags supported
>> in MCQ mode may be larger than in SDB mode.
>> Hence, release the memory allocated in SDB mode and allocate
>> memory for MCQ mode operation.
>> Defines the ufs hardware queue and Completion Queue Entry.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c     | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h |  1 +
>>  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c      | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  include/ufs/ufshcd.h           | 19 ++++++++++++++
>>  include/ufs/ufshci.h           | 21 +++++++++++++++
>>  5 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
[...]

>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
>> index 6d16beb..f624682 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
>> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ int ufshcd_query_flag(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum query_opcode opcode,
>>  void ufshcd_auto_hibern8_update(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 ahit);
>>  int ufshcd_mcq_init(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>  u32 ufshcd_mcq_decide_queue_depth(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>> +int ufshcd_mcq_memory_alloc(struct ufs_hba *hba);
>>
>>  #define SD_ASCII_STD true
>>  #define SD_RAW false
>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> index a71b57e..5fc1e5e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -3676,6 +3676,8 @@ static int ufshcd_memory_alloc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>  		goto out;
>>  	}
>>
>> +	if (hba->utmrdl_base_addr)
>> +		goto skip_utmrdl;
>
>Is this change belongs to this patch?
>
Yes.
This change frees and reallocates the descriptor memory by calling
ufshcd_memory_alloc() if MCQ is supported and configured, see
ufshcd_config_mcq().
I will add a comment here.

-asd

>
>-- 
>மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்