All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] netlink: provide an ability to set default extack message
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:37:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230126143723.7593ce0b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230126223213.riq6i2gdztwuinwi@skbuf>

On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:32:13 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:15:03PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > In netdev common pattern, xxtack pointer is forwarded to the drivers  
>                             ~~~~~~
>                             extack
> 
> > to be filled with error message. However, the caller can easily
> > overwrite the filled message.
> > 
> > Instead of adding multiple "if (!extack->_msg)" checks before any
> > NL_SET_ERR_MSG() call, which appears after call to the driver, let's
> > add this check to common code.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y9Irgrgf3uxOjwUm@unreal
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---  
> 
> I would somewhat prefer not doing this, and instead introducing a new
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_WEAK() of sorts.

That'd be my preference too, FWIW. It's only the offload cases which
need this sort of fallback.

BTW Vladimir, I remember us discussing this. I was searching the
archive as you sent this, but can't find the thread. Mostly curious
whether I flip flipped on this or I'm not completely useless :)

> The reason has to do with the fact that an extack is sometimes also
> used to convey warnings rather than hard errors, for example right here
> in net/dsa/slave.c:
> 
> 	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> 		if (extack && !extack->_msg)
> 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> 					   "Offloading not supported");
> 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> 				   "Offloading not supported");
> 		err = 0;
> 	}

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netlink: provide an ability to set default extack message
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:37:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230126143723.7593ce0b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230126223213.riq6i2gdztwuinwi@skbuf>

On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:32:13 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:15:03PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > In netdev common pattern, xxtack pointer is forwarded to the drivers  
>                             ~~~~~~
>                             extack
> 
> > to be filled with error message. However, the caller can easily
> > overwrite the filled message.
> > 
> > Instead of adding multiple "if (!extack->_msg)" checks before any
> > NL_SET_ERR_MSG() call, which appears after call to the driver, let's
> > add this check to common code.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y9Irgrgf3uxOjwUm@unreal
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---  
> 
> I would somewhat prefer not doing this, and instead introducing a new
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_WEAK() of sorts.

That'd be my preference too, FWIW. It's only the offload cases which
need this sort of fallback.

BTW Vladimir, I remember us discussing this. I was searching the
archive as you sent this, but can't find the thread. Mostly curious
whether I flip flipped on this or I'm not completely useless :)

> The reason has to do with the fact that an extack is sometimes also
> used to convey warnings rather than hard errors, for example right here
> in net/dsa/slave.c:
> 
> 	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> 		if (extack && !extack->_msg)
> 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> 					   "Offloading not supported");
> 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> 				   "Offloading not supported");
> 		err = 0;
> 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-26 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-26 19:15 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next] netlink: provide an ability to set default extack message Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-26 19:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-26 22:32 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-26 22:32   ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-26 22:37   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-01-26 22:37     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-26 22:44     ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-26 22:44       ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-26 23:39       ` [Bridge] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-26 23:39         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-27  5:26     ` [Bridge] " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-27  5:26       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-27  7:26       ` [Bridge] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-27  7:26         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-29 11:43         ` [Bridge] " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-29 11:43           ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-27  5:22   ` [Bridge] " Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-27  5:22     ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-27  9:22     ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-27  9:22       ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230126143723.7593ce0b@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.