From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [REPOST PATCH 02/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce vpmu_counter_access test
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:07:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230215010717.3612794-3-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215010717.3612794-1-rananta@google.com>
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Introduce vpmu_counter_access test for arm64 platforms.
The test configures PMUv3 for a vCPU, sets PMCR_EL0.N for the vCPU,
and check if the guest can consistently see the same number of the
PMU event counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets.
This test case is done with each of the PMCR_EL0.N values from
0 to 31 (With the PMCR_EL0.N values greater than the host value,
the test expects KVM_SET_ONE_REG for the PMCR_EL0 to fail).
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
.../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 208 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index 1750f91dd9362..b27fea0ce5918 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/psci_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vcpu_width_config
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_init
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_irq
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vpmu_counter_access
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += access_tracking_perf_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += demand_paging_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..7a4333f64daef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * vpmu_counter_access - Test vPMU event counter access
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
+ *
+ * This test checks if the guest can see the same number of the PMU event
+ * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets.
+ * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 is supported on the host.
+ */
+#include <kvm_util.h>
+#include <processor.h>
+#include <test_util.h>
+#include <vgic.h>
+#include <asm/perf_event.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+
+/* The max number of the PMU event counters (excluding the cycle counter) */
+#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS (ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
+
+/*
+ * The guest is configured with PMUv3 with @expected_pmcr_n number of
+ * event counters.
+ * Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N.
+ */
+static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
+{
+ uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n;
+
+ GUEST_ASSERT(expected_pmcr_n <= ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS);
+
+ pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0);
+ pmcr_n = FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N, pmcr);
+
+ /* Make sure that PMCR_EL0.N indicates the value userspace set */
+ GUEST_ASSERT_2(pmcr_n == expected_pmcr_n, pmcr_n, expected_pmcr_n);
+
+ GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL
+#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL
+
+/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */
+static struct kvm_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **vcpup,
+ int *gic_fd)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
+ uint8_t pmuver;
+ uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23;
+ struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = {
+ .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+ .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ,
+ .addr = (uint64_t)&irq,
+ };
+ struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = {
+ .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+ .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT,
+ };
+
+ vm = vm_create(1);
+
+ /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
+ vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
+ init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
+ vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
+ *gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vm, 1, 64, GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA);
+
+ /* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), &dfr0);
+ pmuver = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER), dfr0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF &&
+ pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_0,
+ "Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver);
+
+ /* Initialize vPMU */
+ vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr);
+ vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr);
+
+ *vcpup = vcpu;
+ return vm;
+}
+
+static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+ struct ucall uc;
+
+ vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, pmcr_n);
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
+ case UCALL_ABORT:
+ REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT_2(uc, "values:%#lx %#lx");
+ break;
+ case UCALL_DONE:
+ break;
+ default:
+ TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd);
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Create a guest with one vCPU, set the PMCR_EL0.N for the vCPU to @pmcr_n,
+ * and run the test.
+ */
+static void run_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int gic_fd;
+ uint64_t sp, pmcr, pmcr_orig;
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
+
+ pr_debug("Test with pmcr_n %lu\n", pmcr_n);
+ vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, &vcpu, &gic_fd);
+
+ /* Save the initial sp to restore them later to run the guest again */
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), &sp);
+
+ /* Update the PMCR_EL0.N with @pmcr_n */
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr_orig);
+ pmcr = pmcr_orig & ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N;
+ pmcr |= (pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr);
+
+ run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n);
+
+ /*
+ * Reset and re-initialize the vCPU, and run the guest code again to
+ * check if PMCR_EL0.N is preserved.
+ */
+ vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
+ init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
+ aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), sp);
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.pc), (uint64_t)guest_code);
+
+ run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n);
+
+ close(gic_fd);
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Create a guest with one vCPU, and attempt to set the PMCR_EL0.N for
+ * the vCPU to @pmcr_n, which is larger than the host value.
+ * The attempt should fail as @pmcr_n is too big to set for the vCPU.
+ */
+static void run_error_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int gic_fd, ret;
+ uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_orig;
+
+ pr_debug("Error test with pmcr_n %lu (larger than the host)\n", pmcr_n);
+ vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, &vcpu, &gic_fd);
+
+ /* Update the PMCR_EL0.N with @pmcr_n */
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr_orig);
+ pmcr = pmcr_orig & ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N;
+ pmcr |= (pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
+
+ /* This should fail as @pmcr_n is too big to set for the vCPU */
+ ret = __vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret, "Setting PMCR to 0x%lx (orig PMCR 0x%lx) didn't fail",
+ pmcr, pmcr_orig);
+
+ close(gic_fd);
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Return the default number of implemented PMU event counters excluding
+ * the cycle counter (i.e. PMCR_EL0.N value) for the guest.
+ */
+static uint64_t get_pmcr_n_limit(void)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int gic_fd;
+ uint64_t pmcr;
+
+ vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, &vcpu, &gic_fd);
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr);
+ close(gic_fd);
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+ return FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N, pmcr);
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ uint64_t i, pmcr_n;
+
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3));
+
+ pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n_limit();
+ for (i = 0; i <= pmcr_n; i++)
+ run_test(i);
+
+ for (i = pmcr_n + 1; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
+ run_error_test(i);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [REPOST PATCH 02/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce vpmu_counter_access test
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:07:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230215010717.3612794-3-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215010717.3612794-1-rananta@google.com>
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Introduce vpmu_counter_access test for arm64 platforms.
The test configures PMUv3 for a vCPU, sets PMCR_EL0.N for the vCPU,
and check if the guest can consistently see the same number of the
PMU event counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets.
This test case is done with each of the PMCR_EL0.N values from
0 to 31 (With the PMCR_EL0.N values greater than the host value,
the test expects KVM_SET_ONE_REG for the PMCR_EL0 to fail).
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
.../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 208 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index 1750f91dd9362..b27fea0ce5918 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/psci_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vcpu_width_config
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_init
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vgic_irq
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/vpmu_counter_access
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += access_tracking_perf_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += demand_paging_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..7a4333f64daef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * vpmu_counter_access - Test vPMU event counter access
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
+ *
+ * This test checks if the guest can see the same number of the PMU event
+ * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets.
+ * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 is supported on the host.
+ */
+#include <kvm_util.h>
+#include <processor.h>
+#include <test_util.h>
+#include <vgic.h>
+#include <asm/perf_event.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+
+/* The max number of the PMU event counters (excluding the cycle counter) */
+#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS (ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
+
+/*
+ * The guest is configured with PMUv3 with @expected_pmcr_n number of
+ * event counters.
+ * Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N.
+ */
+static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
+{
+ uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n;
+
+ GUEST_ASSERT(expected_pmcr_n <= ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS);
+
+ pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0);
+ pmcr_n = FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N, pmcr);
+
+ /* Make sure that PMCR_EL0.N indicates the value userspace set */
+ GUEST_ASSERT_2(pmcr_n == expected_pmcr_n, pmcr_n, expected_pmcr_n);
+
+ GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL
+#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL
+
+/* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */
+static struct kvm_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **vcpup,
+ int *gic_fd)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
+ uint8_t pmuver;
+ uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23;
+ struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = {
+ .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+ .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ,
+ .addr = (uint64_t)&irq,
+ };
+ struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = {
+ .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+ .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT,
+ };
+
+ vm = vm_create(1);
+
+ /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
+ vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
+ init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
+ vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
+ *gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vm, 1, 64, GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA);
+
+ /* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), &dfr0);
+ pmuver = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER), dfr0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF &&
+ pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_0,
+ "Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver);
+
+ /* Initialize vPMU */
+ vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr);
+ vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr);
+
+ *vcpup = vcpu;
+ return vm;
+}
+
+static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+ struct ucall uc;
+
+ vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, pmcr_n);
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
+ case UCALL_ABORT:
+ REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT_2(uc, "values:%#lx %#lx");
+ break;
+ case UCALL_DONE:
+ break;
+ default:
+ TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd);
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Create a guest with one vCPU, set the PMCR_EL0.N for the vCPU to @pmcr_n,
+ * and run the test.
+ */
+static void run_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int gic_fd;
+ uint64_t sp, pmcr, pmcr_orig;
+ struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
+
+ pr_debug("Test with pmcr_n %lu\n", pmcr_n);
+ vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, &vcpu, &gic_fd);
+
+ /* Save the initial sp to restore them later to run the guest again */
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), &sp);
+
+ /* Update the PMCR_EL0.N with @pmcr_n */
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr_orig);
+ pmcr = pmcr_orig & ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N;
+ pmcr |= (pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr);
+
+ run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n);
+
+ /*
+ * Reset and re-initialize the vCPU, and run the guest code again to
+ * check if PMCR_EL0.N is preserved.
+ */
+ vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
+ init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
+ aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), sp);
+ vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.pc), (uint64_t)guest_code);
+
+ run_vcpu(vcpu, pmcr_n);
+
+ close(gic_fd);
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Create a guest with one vCPU, and attempt to set the PMCR_EL0.N for
+ * the vCPU to @pmcr_n, which is larger than the host value.
+ * The attempt should fail as @pmcr_n is too big to set for the vCPU.
+ */
+static void run_error_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int gic_fd, ret;
+ uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_orig;
+
+ pr_debug("Error test with pmcr_n %lu (larger than the host)\n", pmcr_n);
+ vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, &vcpu, &gic_fd);
+
+ /* Update the PMCR_EL0.N with @pmcr_n */
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr_orig);
+ pmcr = pmcr_orig & ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N;
+ pmcr |= (pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
+
+ /* This should fail as @pmcr_n is too big to set for the vCPU */
+ ret = __vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret, "Setting PMCR to 0x%lx (orig PMCR 0x%lx) didn't fail",
+ pmcr, pmcr_orig);
+
+ close(gic_fd);
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Return the default number of implemented PMU event counters excluding
+ * the cycle counter (i.e. PMCR_EL0.N value) for the guest.
+ */
+static uint64_t get_pmcr_n_limit(void)
+{
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int gic_fd;
+ uint64_t pmcr;
+
+ vm = create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, &vcpu, &gic_fd);
+ vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), &pmcr);
+ close(gic_fd);
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+ return FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N, pmcr);
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ uint64_t i, pmcr_n;
+
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3));
+
+ pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n_limit();
+ for (i = 0; i <= pmcr_n; i++)
+ run_test(i);
+
+ for (i = pmcr_n + 1; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
+ run_error_test(i);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 1:07 [REPOST PATCH 00/16] Add support for vPMU selftests Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 01/16] tools: arm64: Import perf_event.h Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 02/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce vpmu_counter_access test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 03/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for implemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 04/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for unimplemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 05/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Refactor the vPMU counter access tests Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 06/16] tools: arm64: perf_event: Define Cycle counter enable/overflow bits Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-03 0:46 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-03 0:46 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-09 22:14 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-09 22:14 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 07/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add PMU cycle counter helpers Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-03 3:06 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-03 3:06 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-09 22:19 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-09 22:19 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 08/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Consider PMU event filters for VM creation Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-03 4:30 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-03 4:30 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-09 22:45 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-09 22:45 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 09/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add KVM PMU event filter test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-04 20:28 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-04 20:28 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-09 23:17 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-09 23:17 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 10/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add KVM EVTYPE filter PMU test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-07 1:19 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-07 1:19 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-07 16:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-07 16:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-10 21:57 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-10 21:57 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 11/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add vCPU migration test for PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-07 3:43 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-07 3:43 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-10 2:28 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-10 2:28 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 12/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Test PMU overflow/IRQ functionality Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-07 6:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-07 6:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 1:19 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 1:19 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-10 23:58 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-10 23:58 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 13/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Test chained events for PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-08 3:15 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 3:15 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 14/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add PMU test to chain all the counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-08 3:40 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 3:40 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 15/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add multi-vCPU support for vPMU VM creation Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 16/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Extend the vCPU migration test to multi-vCPUs Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-08 4:44 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 4:44 ` Reiji Watanabe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230215010717.3612794-3-rananta@google.com \
--to=rananta@google.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.