From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [REPOST PATCH 04/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for unimplemented counters
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:07:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230215010717.3612794-5-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215010717.3612794-1-rananta@google.com>
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Add a new test case to the vpmu_counter_access test to check
if PMU registers or their bits for unimplemented counters are not
accessible or are RAZ, as expected.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
.../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++--
.../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
index b6593eee2be3d..453f0dd240f44 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
* Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
*
* This test checks if the guest can see the same number of the PMU event
- * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets, and if the guest can access
- * those counters.
+ * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets, if the guest can access
+ * those counters, and if the guest cannot access any other counters.
* This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 is supported on the host.
*/
#include <kvm_util.h>
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS (ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
/*
- * The macros and functions below for reading/writing PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
+ * The macros and functions below for reading/writing PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
* were basically copied from arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c.
*/
#define PMEVN_CASE(n, case_macro) \
@@ -148,9 +148,9 @@ static inline void disable_counter(int idx)
}
/*
- * The pmc_accessor structure has pointers to PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
+ * The pmc_accessor structure has pointers to PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
* accessors that test cases will use. Each of the accessors will
- * either directly reads/writes PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
+ * either directly reads/writes PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
* (i.e. {read,write}_pmev{cnt,type}rn()), or reads/writes them through
* PMXEV{CNTR,TYPER}_EL0 (i.e. {read,write}_sel_ev{cnt,type}r()).
*
@@ -179,6 +179,51 @@ struct pmc_accessor pmc_accessors[] = {
{ read_sel_evcntr, write_pmevcntrn, read_sel_evtyper, write_pmevtypern },
};
+#define INVALID_EC (-1ul)
+uint64_t expected_ec = INVALID_EC;
+uint64_t op_end_addr;
+
+static void guest_sync_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
+{
+ uint64_t esr, ec;
+
+ esr = read_sysreg(esr_el1);
+ ec = (esr >> ESR_EC_SHIFT) & ESR_EC_MASK;
+ GUEST_ASSERT_4(op_end_addr && (expected_ec == ec),
+ regs->pc, esr, ec, expected_ec);
+
+ /* Will go back to op_end_addr after the handler exits */
+ regs->pc = op_end_addr;
+
+ /*
+ * Clear op_end_addr, and setting expected_ec to INVALID_EC
+ * as a sign that an exception has occurred.
+ */
+ op_end_addr = 0;
+ expected_ec = INVALID_EC;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Run the given operation that should trigger an exception with the
+ * given exception class. The exception handler (guest_sync_handler)
+ * will reset op_end_addr to 0, and expected_ec to INVALID_EC, and
+ * will come back to the instruction at the @done_label.
+ * The @done_label must be a unique label in this test program.
+ */
+#define TEST_EXCEPTION(ec, ops, done_label) \
+{ \
+ extern int done_label; \
+ \
+ WRITE_ONCE(op_end_addr, (uint64_t)&done_label); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT(ec != INVALID_EC); \
+ WRITE_ONCE(expected_ec, ec); \
+ dsb(ish); \
+ ops; \
+ asm volatile(#done_label":"); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT(!op_end_addr); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT(expected_ec == INVALID_EC); \
+}
+
static void pmu_disable_reset(void)
{
uint64_t pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0);
@@ -350,16 +395,38 @@ static void test_access_pmc_regs(struct pmc_accessor *acc, int pmc_idx)
pmc_idx, acc, read_data, read_data_prev);
}
+/*
+ * Tests for reading/writing registers for the unimplemented event counter
+ * specified by @pmc_idx (>= PMCR_EL0.N).
+ */
+static void test_access_invalid_pmc_regs(struct pmc_accessor *acc, int pmc_idx)
+{
+ /*
+ * Reading/writing the event count/type registers should cause
+ * an UNDEFINED exception.
+ */
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx), inv_rd_cntr);
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_cntr(pmc_idx, 0), inv_wr_cntr);
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_typer(pmc_idx), inv_rd_typer);
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_typer(pmc_idx, 0), inv_wr_typer);
+ /*
+ * The bit corresponding to the (unimplemented) counter in
+ * {PMCNTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR}_EL1 registers should be RAZ.
+ */
+ test_bitmap_pmu_regs(pmc_idx, 1);
+ test_bitmap_pmu_regs(pmc_idx, 0);
+}
+
/*
* The guest is configured with PMUv3 with @expected_pmcr_n number of
* event counters.
* Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N, and
- * if reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters can work
- * as expected.
+ * if reading/writing PMU registers for implemented or unimplemented
+ * counters can work as expected.
*/
static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
{
- uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n;
+ uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n, unimp_mask;
int i, pmc;
GUEST_ASSERT(expected_pmcr_n <= ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS);
@@ -370,15 +437,31 @@ static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
/* Make sure that PMCR_EL0.N indicates the value userspace set */
GUEST_ASSERT_2(pmcr_n == expected_pmcr_n, pmcr_n, expected_pmcr_n);
+ /*
+ * Make sure that (RAZ) bits corresponding to unimplemented event
+ * counters in {PMCNTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR}_EL1 registers are reset to zero.
+ * (NOTE: bits for implemented event counters are reset to UNKNOWN)
+ */
+ unimp_mask = GENMASK_ULL(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS - 1, pmcr_n);
+ check_bitmap_pmu_regs(unimp_mask, false);
+
/*
* Tests for reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters.
- * Use each combination of PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
+ * Use each combination of PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
*/
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors); i++) {
for (pmc = 0; pmc < pmcr_n; pmc++)
test_access_pmc_regs(&pmc_accessors[i], pmc);
}
+ /*
+ * Tests for reading/writing PMU registers for unimplemented counters.
+ * Use each combination of PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors); i++) {
+ for (pmc = pmcr_n; pmc < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS; pmc++)
+ test_access_invalid_pmc_regs(&pmc_accessors[i], pmc);
+ }
GUEST_DONE();
}
@@ -392,7 +475,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **vcpup,
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
- uint8_t pmuver;
+ uint8_t pmuver, ec;
uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23;
struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = {
.group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
@@ -405,11 +488,18 @@ static struct kvm_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **vcpup,
};
vm = vm_create(1);
+ vm_init_descriptor_tables(vm);
+ /* Catch exceptions for easier debugging */
+ for (ec = 0; ec < ESR_EC_NUM; ec++) {
+ vm_install_sync_handler(vm, VECTOR_SYNC_CURRENT, ec,
+ guest_sync_handler);
+ }
/* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
+ vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu);
*gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vm, 1, 64, GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA);
/* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */
@@ -478,6 +568,7 @@ static void run_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
+ vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu);
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), sp);
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.pc), (uint64_t)guest_code);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
index 5f977528e09c0..52d87809356c8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ enum {
#define ESR_EC_SHIFT 26
#define ESR_EC_MASK (ESR_EC_NUM - 1)
+#define ESR_EC_UNKNOWN 0x0
#define ESR_EC_SVC64 0x15
#define ESR_EC_IABT 0x21
#define ESR_EC_DABT 0x25
--
2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [REPOST PATCH 04/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for unimplemented counters
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:07:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230215010717.3612794-5-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215010717.3612794-1-rananta@google.com>
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Add a new test case to the vpmu_counter_access test to check
if PMU registers or their bits for unimplemented counters are not
accessible or are RAZ, as expected.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
.../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++--
.../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
index b6593eee2be3d..453f0dd240f44 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
* Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
*
* This test checks if the guest can see the same number of the PMU event
- * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets, and if the guest can access
- * those counters.
+ * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets, if the guest can access
+ * those counters, and if the guest cannot access any other counters.
* This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 is supported on the host.
*/
#include <kvm_util.h>
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS (ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
/*
- * The macros and functions below for reading/writing PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
+ * The macros and functions below for reading/writing PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
* were basically copied from arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c.
*/
#define PMEVN_CASE(n, case_macro) \
@@ -148,9 +148,9 @@ static inline void disable_counter(int idx)
}
/*
- * The pmc_accessor structure has pointers to PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
+ * The pmc_accessor structure has pointers to PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
* accessors that test cases will use. Each of the accessors will
- * either directly reads/writes PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
+ * either directly reads/writes PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
* (i.e. {read,write}_pmev{cnt,type}rn()), or reads/writes them through
* PMXEV{CNTR,TYPER}_EL0 (i.e. {read,write}_sel_ev{cnt,type}r()).
*
@@ -179,6 +179,51 @@ struct pmc_accessor pmc_accessors[] = {
{ read_sel_evcntr, write_pmevcntrn, read_sel_evtyper, write_pmevtypern },
};
+#define INVALID_EC (-1ul)
+uint64_t expected_ec = INVALID_EC;
+uint64_t op_end_addr;
+
+static void guest_sync_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
+{
+ uint64_t esr, ec;
+
+ esr = read_sysreg(esr_el1);
+ ec = (esr >> ESR_EC_SHIFT) & ESR_EC_MASK;
+ GUEST_ASSERT_4(op_end_addr && (expected_ec == ec),
+ regs->pc, esr, ec, expected_ec);
+
+ /* Will go back to op_end_addr after the handler exits */
+ regs->pc = op_end_addr;
+
+ /*
+ * Clear op_end_addr, and setting expected_ec to INVALID_EC
+ * as a sign that an exception has occurred.
+ */
+ op_end_addr = 0;
+ expected_ec = INVALID_EC;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Run the given operation that should trigger an exception with the
+ * given exception class. The exception handler (guest_sync_handler)
+ * will reset op_end_addr to 0, and expected_ec to INVALID_EC, and
+ * will come back to the instruction at the @done_label.
+ * The @done_label must be a unique label in this test program.
+ */
+#define TEST_EXCEPTION(ec, ops, done_label) \
+{ \
+ extern int done_label; \
+ \
+ WRITE_ONCE(op_end_addr, (uint64_t)&done_label); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT(ec != INVALID_EC); \
+ WRITE_ONCE(expected_ec, ec); \
+ dsb(ish); \
+ ops; \
+ asm volatile(#done_label":"); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT(!op_end_addr); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT(expected_ec == INVALID_EC); \
+}
+
static void pmu_disable_reset(void)
{
uint64_t pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0);
@@ -350,16 +395,38 @@ static void test_access_pmc_regs(struct pmc_accessor *acc, int pmc_idx)
pmc_idx, acc, read_data, read_data_prev);
}
+/*
+ * Tests for reading/writing registers for the unimplemented event counter
+ * specified by @pmc_idx (>= PMCR_EL0.N).
+ */
+static void test_access_invalid_pmc_regs(struct pmc_accessor *acc, int pmc_idx)
+{
+ /*
+ * Reading/writing the event count/type registers should cause
+ * an UNDEFINED exception.
+ */
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx), inv_rd_cntr);
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_cntr(pmc_idx, 0), inv_wr_cntr);
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_typer(pmc_idx), inv_rd_typer);
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_typer(pmc_idx, 0), inv_wr_typer);
+ /*
+ * The bit corresponding to the (unimplemented) counter in
+ * {PMCNTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR}_EL1 registers should be RAZ.
+ */
+ test_bitmap_pmu_regs(pmc_idx, 1);
+ test_bitmap_pmu_regs(pmc_idx, 0);
+}
+
/*
* The guest is configured with PMUv3 with @expected_pmcr_n number of
* event counters.
* Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N, and
- * if reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters can work
- * as expected.
+ * if reading/writing PMU registers for implemented or unimplemented
+ * counters can work as expected.
*/
static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
{
- uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n;
+ uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n, unimp_mask;
int i, pmc;
GUEST_ASSERT(expected_pmcr_n <= ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS);
@@ -370,15 +437,31 @@ static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
/* Make sure that PMCR_EL0.N indicates the value userspace set */
GUEST_ASSERT_2(pmcr_n == expected_pmcr_n, pmcr_n, expected_pmcr_n);
+ /*
+ * Make sure that (RAZ) bits corresponding to unimplemented event
+ * counters in {PMCNTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR}_EL1 registers are reset to zero.
+ * (NOTE: bits for implemented event counters are reset to UNKNOWN)
+ */
+ unimp_mask = GENMASK_ULL(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS - 1, pmcr_n);
+ check_bitmap_pmu_regs(unimp_mask, false);
+
/*
* Tests for reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters.
- * Use each combination of PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
+ * Use each combination of PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
*/
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors); i++) {
for (pmc = 0; pmc < pmcr_n; pmc++)
test_access_pmc_regs(&pmc_accessors[i], pmc);
}
+ /*
+ * Tests for reading/writing PMU registers for unimplemented counters.
+ * Use each combination of PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors); i++) {
+ for (pmc = pmcr_n; pmc < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS; pmc++)
+ test_access_invalid_pmc_regs(&pmc_accessors[i], pmc);
+ }
GUEST_DONE();
}
@@ -392,7 +475,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **vcpup,
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
- uint8_t pmuver;
+ uint8_t pmuver, ec;
uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23;
struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = {
.group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
@@ -405,11 +488,18 @@ static struct kvm_vm *create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code, struct kvm_vcpu **vcpup,
};
vm = vm_create(1);
+ vm_init_descriptor_tables(vm);
+ /* Catch exceptions for easier debugging */
+ for (ec = 0; ec < ESR_EC_NUM; ec++) {
+ vm_install_sync_handler(vm, VECTOR_SYNC_CURRENT, ec,
+ guest_sync_handler);
+ }
/* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
+ vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu);
*gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vm, 1, 64, GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA);
/* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */
@@ -478,6 +568,7 @@ static void run_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
+ vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vcpu);
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(sp_el1), sp);
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.pc), (uint64_t)guest_code);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
index 5f977528e09c0..52d87809356c8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ enum {
#define ESR_EC_SHIFT 26
#define ESR_EC_MASK (ESR_EC_NUM - 1)
+#define ESR_EC_UNKNOWN 0x0
#define ESR_EC_SVC64 0x15
#define ESR_EC_IABT 0x21
#define ESR_EC_DABT 0x25
--
2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 1:07 [REPOST PATCH 00/16] Add support for vPMU selftests Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 01/16] tools: arm64: Import perf_event.h Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 02/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce vpmu_counter_access test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 03/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for implemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 04/16] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for unimplemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 05/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Refactor the vPMU counter access tests Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 06/16] tools: arm64: perf_event: Define Cycle counter enable/overflow bits Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-03 0:46 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-03 0:46 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-09 22:14 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-09 22:14 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 07/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add PMU cycle counter helpers Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-03 3:06 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-03 3:06 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-09 22:19 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-09 22:19 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 08/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Consider PMU event filters for VM creation Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-03 4:30 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-03 4:30 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-09 22:45 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-09 22:45 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 09/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add KVM PMU event filter test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-04 20:28 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-04 20:28 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-09 23:17 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-09 23:17 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 10/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add KVM EVTYPE filter PMU test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-07 1:19 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-07 1:19 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-07 16:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-07 16:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-10 21:57 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-10 21:57 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 11/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add vCPU migration test for PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-07 3:43 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-07 3:43 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-10 2:28 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-10 2:28 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 12/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Test PMU overflow/IRQ functionality Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-07 6:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-07 6:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 1:19 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 1:19 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-10 23:58 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-10 23:58 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 13/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Test chained events for PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-08 3:15 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 3:15 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 14/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add PMU test to chain all the counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-08 3:40 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 3:40 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 15/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Add multi-vCPU support for vPMU VM creation Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` [REPOST PATCH 16/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Extend the vCPU migration test to multi-vCPUs Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-02-15 1:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-03-08 4:44 ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-03-08 4:44 ` Reiji Watanabe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230215010717.3612794-5-rananta@google.com \
--to=rananta@google.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.