All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, willemb@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: skbuff: let struct skb_ext live inside the head
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:13:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230215101356.3b86c451@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215094332.GB9908@breakpoint.cc>

On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:43:32 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:
> I think the cleaner solution would be to move the new extension ids
> into sk_buff itself (at the end, uninitialized data unless used).
> 
> Those extensions would always reside there and not in the slab object.

Do you mean the entire extension? 8B of metadata + (possibly) 32B 
of the key?

> Obviously that only makes sense for extensions where we assume
> that typical workload will require them, which might be a hard call to
> make.

I'm guessing that's the reason why Google is okay with putting the key
in the skb - they know they will use it most of the time. But an
average RHEL user may appreciate the skb growth for an esoteric protocol
to a much smaller extent :(

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-15 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-15  3:44 [RFC] net: skbuff: let struct skb_ext live inside the head Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-15  8:53 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-02-15 17:58   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-15  9:43 ` Florian Westphal
2023-02-15 14:37   ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-02-15 18:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-15 18:13   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-02-16 13:28     ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230215101356.3b86c451@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.