From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>, Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Subject: [net-next 09/14] net/mlx5: Refactor completion irq request/release code
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:51:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230320175144.153187-10-saeed@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320175144.153187-1-saeed@kernel.org>
From: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Break the request and release functions into pci and sub-functions
devices handling for better readability, eventually making the code
symmetric in terms of request/release.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | 70 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
index b43121f64a80..ed75b527280e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
@@ -804,44 +804,28 @@ void mlx5_eq_update_ci(struct mlx5_eq *eq, u32 cc, bool arm)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mlx5_eq_update_ci);
-static void comp_irqs_release(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
+static void comp_irqs_release_pci(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
{
struct mlx5_eq_table *table = dev->priv.eq_table;
- if (mlx5_core_is_sf(dev))
- mlx5_irq_affinity_irqs_release(dev, table->comp_irqs, table->num_comp_eqs);
- else
- mlx5_irqs_release_vectors(table->comp_irqs, table->num_comp_eqs);
- kfree(table->comp_irqs);
+ mlx5_irqs_release_vectors(table->comp_irqs, table->num_comp_eqs);
}
-static int comp_irqs_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
+static int comp_irqs_request_pci(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
{
struct mlx5_eq_table *table = dev->priv.eq_table;
const struct cpumask *prev = cpu_none_mask;
const struct cpumask *mask;
- int ncomp_eqs = table->num_comp_eqs;
+ int ncomp_eqs;
u16 *cpus;
int ret;
int cpu;
int i;
ncomp_eqs = table->num_comp_eqs;
- table->comp_irqs = kcalloc(ncomp_eqs, sizeof(*table->comp_irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!table->comp_irqs)
- return -ENOMEM;
- if (mlx5_core_is_sf(dev)) {
- ret = mlx5_irq_affinity_irqs_request_auto(dev, ncomp_eqs, table->comp_irqs);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto free_irqs;
- return ret;
- }
-
cpus = kcalloc(ncomp_eqs, sizeof(*cpus), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!cpus) {
+ if (!cpus)
ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto free_irqs;
- }
i = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -857,12 +841,50 @@ static int comp_irqs_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
rcu_read_unlock();
ret = mlx5_irqs_request_vectors(dev, cpus, ncomp_eqs, table->comp_irqs);
kfree(cpus);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto free_irqs;
return ret;
+}
+
+static void comp_irqs_release_sf(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
+{
+ struct mlx5_eq_table *table = dev->priv.eq_table;
+
+ mlx5_irq_affinity_irqs_release(dev, table->comp_irqs, table->num_comp_eqs);
+}
+
+static int comp_irqs_request_sf(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
+{
+ struct mlx5_eq_table *table = dev->priv.eq_table;
+ int ncomp_eqs = table->num_comp_eqs;
+
+ return mlx5_irq_affinity_irqs_request_auto(dev, ncomp_eqs, table->comp_irqs);
+}
+
+static void comp_irqs_release(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
+{
+ struct mlx5_eq_table *table = dev->priv.eq_table;
+
+ mlx5_core_is_sf(dev) ? comp_irqs_release_sf(dev) :
+ comp_irqs_release_pci(dev);
-free_irqs:
kfree(table->comp_irqs);
+}
+
+static int comp_irqs_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
+{
+ struct mlx5_eq_table *table = dev->priv.eq_table;
+ int ncomp_eqs;
+ int ret;
+
+ ncomp_eqs = table->num_comp_eqs;
+ table->comp_irqs = kcalloc(ncomp_eqs, sizeof(*table->comp_irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!table->comp_irqs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = mlx5_core_is_sf(dev) ? comp_irqs_request_sf(dev) :
+ comp_irqs_request_pci(dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ kfree(table->comp_irqs);
+
return ret;
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-20 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-20 17:51 [pull request][net-next 00/14] mlx5 updates 2023-03-20 Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 01/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Avoid use after free on rmap->obj array entries Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22 3:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 9:43 ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 02/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Use allocator for rmap entries Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22 3:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 3:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 10:01 ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-22 10:01 ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 03/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Add irq_cpu_rmap_remove to complement irq_cpu_rmap_add Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22 3:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 11:24 ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-22 18:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 04/14] net/mlx5e: Coding style fix, add empty line Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 05/14] net/mlx5: Fix wrong comment Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 06/14] net/mlx5: Modify struct mlx5_irq to use struct msi_map Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 07/14] net/mlx5: Use newer affinity descriptor Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 08/14] net/mlx5: Improve naming of pci function vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 10/14] net/mlx5: Use dynamic msix vectors allocation Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 11/14] net/mlx5: Move devlink registration before mlx5_load Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 12/14] net/mlx5: Refactor calculation of required completion vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 13/14] net/mlx5: Use one completion vector if eth is disabled Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 14/14] net/mlx5: Provide external API for allocating vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22 3:49 ` [pull request][net-next 00/14] mlx5 updates 2023-03-20 Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 20:24 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230320175144.153187-10-saeed@kernel.org \
--to=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.