All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>, Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Subject: [net-next 08/14] net/mlx5: Improve naming of pci function vectors
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:51:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230320175144.153187-9-saeed@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320175144.153187-1-saeed@kernel.org>

From: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>

The variable pf_vec is used to denote the number of vectors required for
the pci function's own use. To avoid confusion interpreting pf as
physical function, change the name to pcif_vec.

Same reasoning goes for pf_pool which is really pci function pool.

Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c | 46 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c
index df6c2f8eb5df..c8e2b1ac7fe5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ struct mlx5_irq {
 };
 
 struct mlx5_irq_table {
-	struct mlx5_irq_pool *pf_pool;
+	struct mlx5_irq_pool *pcif_pool;
 	struct mlx5_irq_pool *sf_ctrl_pool;
 	struct mlx5_irq_pool *sf_comp_pool;
 };
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ struct mlx5_irq_pool *mlx5_irq_pool_get(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 	/* In some configs, there won't be a pool of SFs IRQs. Hence, returning
 	 * the PF IRQs pool in case the SF pool doesn't exist.
 	 */
-	return pool ? pool : irq_table->pf_pool;
+	return pool ? pool : irq_table->pcif_pool;
 }
 
 static struct mlx5_irq_pool *ctrl_irq_pool_get(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static struct mlx5_irq_pool *ctrl_irq_pool_get(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 	/* In some configs, there won't be a pool of SFs IRQs. Hence, returning
 	 * the PF IRQs pool in case the SF pool doesn't exist.
 	 */
-	return pool ? pool : irq_table->pf_pool;
+	return pool ? pool : irq_table->pcif_pool;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ struct mlx5_irq *mlx5_irq_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 vecidx,
 	struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool;
 	struct mlx5_irq *irq;
 
-	pool = irq_table->pf_pool;
+	pool = irq_table->pcif_pool;
 	irq = irq_pool_request_vector(pool, vecidx, af_desc);
 	if (IS_ERR(irq))
 		return irq;
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static void irq_pool_free(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool)
 	kvfree(pool);
 }
 
-static int irq_pools_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int sf_vec, int pf_vec)
+static int irq_pools_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int sf_vec, int pcif_vec)
 {
 	struct mlx5_irq_table *table = dev->priv.irq_table;
 	int num_sf_ctrl_by_msix;
@@ -527,12 +527,12 @@ static int irq_pools_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int sf_vec, int pf_vec)
 	int num_sf_ctrl;
 	int err;
 
-	/* init pf_pool */
-	table->pf_pool = irq_pool_alloc(dev, 0, pf_vec, NULL,
-					MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MIN_COMP,
-					MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MAX_COMP);
-	if (IS_ERR(table->pf_pool))
-		return PTR_ERR(table->pf_pool);
+	/* init pcif_pool */
+	table->pcif_pool = irq_pool_alloc(dev, 0, pcif_vec, NULL,
+					  MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MIN_COMP,
+					  MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MAX_COMP);
+	if (IS_ERR(table->pcif_pool))
+		return PTR_ERR(table->pcif_pool);
 	if (!mlx5_sf_max_functions(dev))
 		return 0;
 	if (sf_vec < MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE_SF) {
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static int irq_pools_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int sf_vec, int pf_vec)
 					  MLX5_SFS_PER_CTRL_IRQ);
 	num_sf_ctrl = min_t(int, num_sf_ctrl_by_msix, num_sf_ctrl_by_sfs);
 	num_sf_ctrl = min_t(int, MLX5_IRQ_CTRL_SF_MAX, num_sf_ctrl);
-	table->sf_ctrl_pool = irq_pool_alloc(dev, pf_vec, num_sf_ctrl,
+	table->sf_ctrl_pool = irq_pool_alloc(dev, pcif_vec, num_sf_ctrl,
 					     "mlx5_sf_ctrl",
 					     MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MIN_CTRL,
 					     MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MAX_CTRL);
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static int irq_pools_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int sf_vec, int pf_vec)
 		goto err_pf;
 	}
 	/* init sf_comp_pool */
-	table->sf_comp_pool = irq_pool_alloc(dev, pf_vec + num_sf_ctrl,
+	table->sf_comp_pool = irq_pool_alloc(dev, pcif_vec + num_sf_ctrl,
 					     sf_vec - num_sf_ctrl, "mlx5_sf_comp",
 					     MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MIN_COMP,
 					     MLX5_EQ_SHARE_IRQ_MAX_COMP);
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int irq_pools_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int sf_vec, int pf_vec)
 err_sf_ctrl:
 	irq_pool_free(table->sf_ctrl_pool);
 err_pf:
-	irq_pool_free(table->pf_pool);
+	irq_pool_free(table->pcif_pool);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static void irq_pools_destroy(struct mlx5_irq_table *table)
 		irq_pool_free(table->sf_comp_pool);
 		irq_pool_free(table->sf_ctrl_pool);
 	}
-	irq_pool_free(table->pf_pool);
+	irq_pool_free(table->pcif_pool);
 }
 
 /* irq_table API */
@@ -618,9 +618,9 @@ void mlx5_irq_table_cleanup(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 
 int mlx5_irq_table_get_num_comp(struct mlx5_irq_table *table)
 {
-	if (!table->pf_pool->xa_num_irqs.max)
+	if (!table->pcif_pool->xa_num_irqs.max)
 		return 1;
-	return table->pf_pool->xa_num_irqs.max - table->pf_pool->xa_num_irqs.min;
+	return table->pcif_pool->xa_num_irqs.max - table->pcif_pool->xa_num_irqs.min;
 }
 
 int mlx5_irq_table_create(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
@@ -629,16 +629,16 @@ int mlx5_irq_table_create(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 		      MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, max_num_eqs) :
 		      1 << MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, log_max_eq);
 	int total_vec;
-	int pf_vec;
+	int pcif_vec;
 	int err;
 
 	if (mlx5_core_is_sf(dev))
 		return 0;
 
-	pf_vec = MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, num_ports) * num_online_cpus() + 1;
-	pf_vec = min_t(int, pf_vec, num_eqs);
+	pcif_vec = MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, num_ports) * num_online_cpus() + 1;
+	pcif_vec = min_t(int, pcif_vec, num_eqs);
 
-	total_vec = pf_vec;
+	total_vec = pcif_vec;
 	if (mlx5_sf_max_functions(dev))
 		total_vec += MLX5_IRQ_CTRL_SF_MAX +
 			MLX5_COMP_EQS_PER_SF * mlx5_sf_max_functions(dev);
@@ -646,9 +646,9 @@ int mlx5_irq_table_create(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 	total_vec = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(dev->pdev, 1, total_vec, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
 	if (total_vec < 0)
 		return total_vec;
-	pf_vec = min(pf_vec, total_vec);
+	pcif_vec = min(pcif_vec, total_vec);
 
-	err = irq_pools_init(dev, total_vec - pf_vec, pf_vec);
+	err = irq_pools_init(dev, total_vec - pcif_vec, pcif_vec);
 	if (err)
 		pci_free_irq_vectors(dev->pdev);
 
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-20 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-20 17:51 [pull request][net-next 00/14] mlx5 updates 2023-03-20 Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 01/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Avoid use after free on rmap->obj array entries Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22  3:38   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22  9:43     ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 02/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Use allocator for rmap entries Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22  3:40   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22  3:50     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 10:01       ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-22 10:01     ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 03/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Add irq_cpu_rmap_remove to complement irq_cpu_rmap_add Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22  3:46   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 11:24     ` Eli Cohen
2023-03-22 18:45       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 04/14] net/mlx5e: Coding style fix, add empty line Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 05/14] net/mlx5: Fix wrong comment Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 06/14] net/mlx5: Modify struct mlx5_irq to use struct msi_map Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 07/14] net/mlx5: Use newer affinity descriptor Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 09/14] net/mlx5: Refactor completion irq request/release code Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 10/14] net/mlx5: Use dynamic msix vectors allocation Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 11/14] net/mlx5: Move devlink registration before mlx5_load Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 12/14] net/mlx5: Refactor calculation of required completion vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 13/14] net/mlx5: Use one completion vector if eth is disabled Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-20 17:51 ` [net-next 14/14] net/mlx5: Provide external API for allocating vectors Saeed Mahameed
2023-03-22  3:49 ` [pull request][net-next 00/14] mlx5 updates 2023-03-20 Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-22 20:24 ` Jacob Keller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230320175144.153187-9-saeed@kernel.org \
    --to=saeed@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=elic@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.