From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 16/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c converted to inline assembly
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 04:54:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230325025524.144043-17-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230325025524.144043-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Test verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c | 228 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c | 181 --------------
3 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 181 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 36fdede7dcab..29351c774ee2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include "verifier_cgroup_skb.skel.h"
#include "verifier_cgroup_storage.skel.h"
#include "verifier_const_or.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_ctx_sk_msg.skel.h"
__maybe_unused
static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
@@ -48,3 +49,4 @@ void test_verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode(void) { RUN(verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode)
void test_verifier_cgroup_skb(void) { RUN(verifier_cgroup_skb); }
void test_verifier_cgroup_storage(void) { RUN(verifier_cgroup_storage); }
void test_verifier_const_or(void) { RUN(verifier_const_or); }
+void test_verifier_ctx_sk_msg(void) { RUN(verifier_ctx_sk_msg); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..65edc89799f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access family in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void access_family_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_family]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_family, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access remote_ip4 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void remote_ip4_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip4]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip4, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip4))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access local_ip4 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void local_ip4_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip4]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip4, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip4))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access remote_port in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void remote_port_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_port]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_port, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_port))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access local_port in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void local_port_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_port]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_port, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb")
+__description("valid access remote_ip6 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void remote_ip6_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_0]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_1]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_2]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_3]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[0])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_1, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[1])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_2, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[2])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_3, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[3]))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb")
+__description("valid access local_ip6 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void local_ip6_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_0]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_1]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_2]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_3]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[0])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_1, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[1])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_2, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[2])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_3, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[3]))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access size in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void access_size_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_size]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_size, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("invalid 64B read of size in SK_MSG")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void of_size_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_size]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_size, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("invalid read past end of SK_MSG")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__naked void past_end_of_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__imm_0]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__imm_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size) + 4)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("invalid read offset in SK_MSG")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void read_offset_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__imm_0]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__imm_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family) + 1)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("direct packet read for SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void packet_read_for_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = *(u8*)(r2 + 0); \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data_end, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("direct packet write for SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void packet_write_for_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ *(u8*)(r2 + 0) = r2; \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data_end, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void direct_packet_access_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r1 = r2; \
+ r1 += 6; \
+ if r1 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = *(u16*)(r2 + 6); \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data_end, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c
deleted file mode 100644
index c6c69220a569..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,181 +0,0 @@
-{
- "valid access family in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access remote_ip4 in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip4)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access local_ip4 in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip4)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access remote_port in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_port)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access local_port in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access remote_ip6 in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[0])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[1])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[2])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[3])),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
-},
-{
- "valid access local_ip6 in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[0])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[1])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[2])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[3])),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
-},
-{
- "valid access size in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "invalid 64B read of size in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "invalid read past end of SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size) + 4),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "invalid read offset in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family) + 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "direct packet read for SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "direct packet write for SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-25 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-25 2:54 [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/43] selftests/bpf: Report program name on parse_test_spec error Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/43] selftests/bpf: __imm_insn & __imm_const macro for bpf_misc.h Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/43] selftests/bpf: Unprivileged tests for test_loader.c Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/43] selftests/bpf: Tests execution support " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/43] selftests/bpf: prog_tests entry point for migrated test_verifier tests Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/and.c converted to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/array_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/basic_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_deduction.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cfg.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_inv_retcode.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_skb.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_storage.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/const_or.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/direct_stack_access_wraparound.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div0.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div_overflow.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_access_var_len.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_packet_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_restricted.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_value_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/int_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 25/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ld_ind.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 26/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/leak_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 27/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 28/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ret_val.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 29/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/masking.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 30/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/meta_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 31/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 32/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_tp_writable.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 33/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ringbuf.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 34/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/spill_fill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 35/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/stack_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 36/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/uninit.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 37/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_adj_spill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 38/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 39/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_or_null.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 40/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/var_off.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 41/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xadd.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 42/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xdp.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 3:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-25 12:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 16:16 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-26 1:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 3:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 3:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 11:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-27 16:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 16:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-26 1:32 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-03-28 3:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-03-28 21:52 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 22:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-28 22:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 23:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-29 0:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-29 0:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230325025524.144043-17-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.