From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 06/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/and.c converted to inline assembly
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 04:54:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230325025524.144043-7-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230325025524.144043-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Test verifier/and.c automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 3 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_and.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c | 68 -----------
3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_and.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index aa63f5d84d97..34526f6d5ab1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <test_progs.h>
#include "cap_helpers.h"
+#include "verifier_and.skel.h"
__maybe_unused
static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
@@ -27,3 +28,5 @@ static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_fac
}
#define RUN(skel) run_tests_aux(#skel, skel##__elf_bytes)
+
+void test_verifier_and(void) { RUN(verifier_and); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_and.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_and.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e97e518516b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_and.c
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+#define MAX_ENTRIES 11
+
+struct test_val {
+ unsigned int index;
+ int foo[MAX_ENTRIES];
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, long long);
+ __type(value, struct test_val);
+} map_hash_48b SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid and of negative number")
+__failure __msg("R0 max value is outside of the allowed memory range")
+__failure_unpriv
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void invalid_and_of_negative_number(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r1 = *(u8*)(r0 + 0); \
+ r1 &= -4; \
+ r1 <<= 2; \
+ r0 += r1; \
+l0_%=: r1 = %[test_val_foo]; \
+ *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_48b),
+ __imm_const(test_val_foo, offsetof(struct test_val, foo))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid range check")
+__failure __msg("R0 max value is outside of the allowed memory range")
+__failure_unpriv
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void invalid_range_check(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_48b] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r1 = *(u32*)(r0 + 0); \
+ r9 = 1; \
+ w1 %%= 2; \
+ w1 += 1; \
+ w9 &= w1; \
+ w9 += 1; \
+ w9 >>= 1; \
+ w3 = 1; \
+ w3 -= w9; \
+ w3 *= 0x10000000; \
+ r0 += r3; \
+ *(u32*)(r0 + 0) = r3; \
+l0_%=: r0 = r0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("check known subreg with unknown reg")
+__success __failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("R1 !read_ok")
+__retval(0)
+__naked void known_subreg_with_unknown_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \
+ r0 <<= 32; \
+ r0 += 1; \
+ r0 &= 0xFFFF1234; \
+ /* Upper bits are unknown but AND above masks out 1 zero'ing lower bits */\
+ if w0 < 1 goto l0_%=; \
+ r1 = *(u32*)(r1 + 512); \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 7d7ebee5cc7a..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/and.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
- "invalid and of negative number",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, -4),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 2),
- BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, offsetof(struct test_val, foo)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
- .errstr = "R0 max value is outside of the allowed memory range",
- .result = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "invalid range check",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 12),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_9, 1),
- BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_1, 2),
- BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
- BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1),
- BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_9, 1),
- BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_9, 1),
- BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_9),
- BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_3, 0x10000000),
- BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
- .errstr = "R0 max value is outside of the allowed memory range",
- .result = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "check known subreg with unknown reg",
- .insns = {
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_0, 32),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 0xFFFF1234),
- /* Upper bits are unknown but AND above masks out 1 zero'ing lower bits */
- BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 512),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr_unpriv = "R1 !read_ok",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .retval = 0
-},
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-25 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-25 2:54 [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/43] selftests/bpf: Report program name on parse_test_spec error Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/43] selftests/bpf: __imm_insn & __imm_const macro for bpf_misc.h Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/43] selftests/bpf: Unprivileged tests for test_loader.c Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/43] selftests/bpf: Tests execution support " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/43] selftests/bpf: prog_tests entry point for migrated test_verifier tests Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/array_access.c converted to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/basic_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_deduction.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cfg.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_inv_retcode.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_skb.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_storage.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/const_or.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/direct_stack_access_wraparound.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div0.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div_overflow.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_access_var_len.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_packet_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_restricted.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_value_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/int_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 25/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ld_ind.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 26/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/leak_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 27/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 28/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ret_val.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 29/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/masking.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 30/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/meta_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 31/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 32/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_tp_writable.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 33/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ringbuf.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 34/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/spill_fill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 35/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/stack_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 36/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/uninit.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 37/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_adj_spill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 38/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 39/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_or_null.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 40/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/var_off.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 41/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xadd.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 42/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xdp.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 3:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-25 12:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 16:16 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-26 1:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 3:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 3:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 11:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-27 16:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 16:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-26 1:32 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-03-28 3:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-03-28 21:52 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 22:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-28 22:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 23:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-29 0:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-29 0:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230325025524.144043-7-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.