From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 27/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ptr.c converted to inline assembly
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 04:55:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230325025524.144043-28-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230325025524.144043-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Test verifier/map_ptr.c automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c | 99 -----------
3 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index f8b3b6beba3f..d2f3bff0e942 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include "verifier_int_ptr.skel.h"
#include "verifier_ld_ind.skel.h"
#include "verifier_leak_ptr.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_map_ptr.skel.h"
__maybe_unused
static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
@@ -70,3 +71,4 @@ void test_verifier_helper_value_access(void) { RUN(verifier_helper_value_access
void test_verifier_int_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_int_ptr); }
void test_verifier_ld_ind(void) { RUN(verifier_ld_ind); }
void test_verifier_leak_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_leak_ptr); }
+void test_verifier_map_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_map_ptr); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..11a079145966
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+#define MAX_ENTRIES 11
+
+struct test_val {
+ unsigned int index;
+ int foo[MAX_ENTRIES];
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, struct test_val);
+} map_array_48b SEC(".maps");
+
+struct other_val {
+ long long foo;
+ long long bar;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, long long);
+ __type(value, struct other_val);
+} map_hash_16b SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: read with negative offset rejected")
+__failure __msg("R1 is bpf_array invalid negative access: off=-8")
+__failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN")
+__naked void read_with_negative_offset_rejected(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = r10; \
+ r1 = %[map_array_48b] ll; \
+ r6 = *(u64*)(r1 - 8); \
+ r0 = 1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_addr(map_array_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: write rejected")
+__failure __msg("only read from bpf_array is supported")
+__failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN")
+__naked void bpf_map_ptr_write_rejected(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = %[map_array_48b] ll; \
+ *(u64*)(r1 + 0) = r2; \
+ r0 = 1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_addr(map_array_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: read non-existent field rejected")
+__failure
+__msg("cannot access ptr member ops with moff 0 in struct bpf_map with off 1 size 4")
+__failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void read_non_existent_field_rejected(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = 0; \
+ r1 = %[map_array_48b] ll; \
+ r6 = *(u32*)(r1 + 1); \
+ r0 = 1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_addr(map_array_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted")
+__success __failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN")
+__retval(1)
+__naked void ptr_read_ops_field_accepted(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = 0; \
+ r1 = %[map_array_48b] ll; \
+ r6 = *(u64*)(r1 + 0); \
+ r0 = 1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_addr(map_array_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, map_ptr = map_ptr + r")
+__success __failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation")
+__retval(0)
+__naked void map_ptr_map_ptr_r(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_16b] ll; \
+ r1 += r0; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_16b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, r = r + map_ptr")
+__success __failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("R0 has pointer with unsupported alu operation")
+__retval(0)
+__naked void _0_r_r_map_ptr(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ r0 = %[map_hash_16b] ll; \
+ r1 += r0; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_16b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 17ee84dc7766..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,99 +0,0 @@
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: read with negative offset rejected",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, -8),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "R1 is bpf_array invalid negative access: off=-8",
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: write rejected",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "only read from bpf_array is supported",
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: read non-existent field rejected",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 1),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "cannot access ptr member ops with moff 0 in struct bpf_map with off 1 size 4",
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .retval = 1,
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, map_ptr = map_ptr + r",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
- .result = ACCEPT,
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, r = r + map_ptr",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "R0 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
- .result = ACCEPT,
-},
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-25 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-25 2:54 [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/43] selftests/bpf: Report program name on parse_test_spec error Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/43] selftests/bpf: __imm_insn & __imm_const macro for bpf_misc.h Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/43] selftests/bpf: Unprivileged tests for test_loader.c Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/43] selftests/bpf: Tests execution support " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/43] selftests/bpf: prog_tests entry point for migrated test_verifier tests Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/and.c converted to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/array_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/basic_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_deduction.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cfg.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_inv_retcode.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_skb.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_storage.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/const_or.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/direct_stack_access_wraparound.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div0.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div_overflow.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_access_var_len.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_packet_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_restricted.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_value_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/int_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 25/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ld_ind.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 26/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/leak_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 28/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ret_val.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 29/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/masking.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 30/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/meta_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 31/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 32/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_tp_writable.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 33/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ringbuf.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 34/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/spill_fill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 35/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/stack_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 36/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/uninit.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 37/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_adj_spill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 38/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 39/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_or_null.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 40/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/var_off.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 41/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xadd.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 42/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xdp.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 3:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-25 12:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 16:16 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-26 1:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 3:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 3:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 11:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-27 16:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 16:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-26 1:32 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-03-28 3:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-03-28 21:52 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 22:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-28 22:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 23:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-29 0:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-29 0:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230325025524.144043-28-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.