Re: [Patch net] vsock: improve tap delivery accuracy

From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
	Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net] vsock: improve tap delivery accuracy
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 16:14:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230502201418.GG535070@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230502174404.668749-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1779 bytes --]

On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 10:44:04AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> 
> When virtqueue_add_sgs() fails, the skb is put back to send queue,
> we should not deliver the copy to tap device in this case. So we
> need to move virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt() down after all
> possible failures.
> 
> Fixes: 82dfb540aeb2 ("VSOCK: Add virtio vsock vsockmon hooks")
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> index e95df847176b..055678628c07 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> @@ -109,9 +109,6 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		if (!skb)
>  			break;
>  
> -		virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(skb);
> -		reply = virtio_vsock_skb_reply(skb);
> -
>  		sg_init_one(&hdr, virtio_vsock_hdr(skb), sizeof(*virtio_vsock_hdr(skb)));
>  		sgs[out_sg++] = &hdr;
>  		if (skb->len > 0) {
> @@ -128,6 +125,8 @@ virtio_transport_send_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> +		virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(skb);
> +		reply = virtio_vsock_skb_reply(skb);

I don't remember the reason for the ordering, but I'm pretty sure it was
deliberate. Probably because the payload buffers could be freed as soon
as virtqueue_add_sgs() is called.

If that's no longer true with Bobby's skbuff code, then maybe it's safe
to monitor packets after they have been sent.

Stefan

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization