From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
ltp@lists.linux.it, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] nfs: Run on btrfs, ext4, xfs
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 01:23:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230504232321.GA25208@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504220037.GB4244@pevik>
Hi all,
...
> Tomorrow I'll test this:
> check_umount()
> {
> local i
> local dir="$1"
> local type="${2:-lhost}"
> local cmd="grep -q $dir /proc/mounts"
> for i in $(seq 50); do
> if [ "$type" = "lhost" ]; then
> $cmd || return
> else
> tst_rhost_run -c "$cmd" || return
> fi
> tst_sleep 100ms
> tst_res TWARN "failed to umount '$dir'"
> done
> }
> for i in $VERSION; do
> local_dir="$(get_local_dir $i $n)"
> grep -q "$local_dir" /proc/mounts && umount $local_dir
> # instead of 'sleep 2' below check here:
> check_umount "$local_dir"
> n=$(( n + 1 ))
> done
> n=0
> for i in $VERSION; do
> type=$(get_socket_type $n)
> remote_dir="$(get_remote_dir $i $type)"
> if tst_net_use_netns; then
> if test -d $remote_dir; then
> exportfs -u *:$remote_dir
> check_umount "$remote_dir" # instead of sleep 1
> rm -rf $remote_dir
> fi
> else
> tst_rhost_run -c "test -d $remote_dir && exportfs -u *:$remote_dir"
> check_umount "$remote_dir" rhost # instead of sleep 1
> tst_rhost_run -c "test -d $remote_dir && rm -rf $remote_dir"
> fi
> n=$(( n + 1 ))
> done
I tried various code (not only the one - wrong - above), but nothing works.
With fuser -vm, I wonder if there is some bug in older nfs versions:
USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
/tmp/LTP_nfs08.fncaxJum2W/mntpoint/4/tcp:
root kernel mount /tmp/LTP_nfs08.fncaxJum2W/mntpoint
root kernel knfsd /tmp/LTP_nfs08.fncaxJum2W/mntpoint/4
Looking at c6c7f2a84da4 ("nfsd: Ensure knfsd shuts down when the "nfsd" pseudofs
is unmounted"), maybe there are other bugs, which causes files are used.
I also tried to use /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_filesystem and
/proc/fs/nfsd/write_unlock_ip which made things better a bit (6.2.12), but still
it's not 100% solution. Also, "Release all locks on a local file system"
(unlock_filesystem) and Release all locks used by a client (write_unlock_ip) are
unlikely what I'm searching.
umount $local_dir
echo "$local_dir" > /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_filesystem
# $(tst_ipaddr rhost) => IP of the server
echo "$(tst_ipaddr rhost)" > /proc/fs/nfsd/write_unlock_ip
...
exportfs -u *:$remote_dir
echo "$remote_dir" > /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_filesystem
=> any hint is welcome.
Kind regards,
Petr
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
ltp@lists.linux.it, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v5 5/5] nfs: Run on btrfs, ext4, xfs
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 01:23:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230504232321.GA25208@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230504220037.GB4244@pevik>
Hi all,
...
> Tomorrow I'll test this:
> check_umount()
> {
> local i
> local dir="$1"
> local type="${2:-lhost}"
> local cmd="grep -q $dir /proc/mounts"
> for i in $(seq 50); do
> if [ "$type" = "lhost" ]; then
> $cmd || return
> else
> tst_rhost_run -c "$cmd" || return
> fi
> tst_sleep 100ms
> tst_res TWARN "failed to umount '$dir'"
> done
> }
> for i in $VERSION; do
> local_dir="$(get_local_dir $i $n)"
> grep -q "$local_dir" /proc/mounts && umount $local_dir
> # instead of 'sleep 2' below check here:
> check_umount "$local_dir"
> n=$(( n + 1 ))
> done
> n=0
> for i in $VERSION; do
> type=$(get_socket_type $n)
> remote_dir="$(get_remote_dir $i $type)"
> if tst_net_use_netns; then
> if test -d $remote_dir; then
> exportfs -u *:$remote_dir
> check_umount "$remote_dir" # instead of sleep 1
> rm -rf $remote_dir
> fi
> else
> tst_rhost_run -c "test -d $remote_dir && exportfs -u *:$remote_dir"
> check_umount "$remote_dir" rhost # instead of sleep 1
> tst_rhost_run -c "test -d $remote_dir && rm -rf $remote_dir"
> fi
> n=$(( n + 1 ))
> done
I tried various code (not only the one - wrong - above), but nothing works.
With fuser -vm, I wonder if there is some bug in older nfs versions:
USER PID ACCESS COMMAND
/tmp/LTP_nfs08.fncaxJum2W/mntpoint/4/tcp:
root kernel mount /tmp/LTP_nfs08.fncaxJum2W/mntpoint
root kernel knfsd /tmp/LTP_nfs08.fncaxJum2W/mntpoint/4
Looking at c6c7f2a84da4 ("nfsd: Ensure knfsd shuts down when the "nfsd" pseudofs
is unmounted"), maybe there are other bugs, which causes files are used.
I also tried to use /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_filesystem and
/proc/fs/nfsd/write_unlock_ip which made things better a bit (6.2.12), but still
it's not 100% solution. Also, "Release all locks on a local file system"
(unlock_filesystem) and Release all locks used by a client (write_unlock_ip) are
unlikely what I'm searching.
umount $local_dir
echo "$local_dir" > /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_filesystem
# $(tst_ipaddr rhost) => IP of the server
echo "$(tst_ipaddr rhost)" > /proc/fs/nfsd/write_unlock_ip
...
exportfs -u *:$remote_dir
echo "$remote_dir" > /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_filesystem
=> any hint is welcome.
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-04 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-04 13:14 [PATCH v5 0/5] NFS: test on btrfs, ext4, xfs filesystems Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] nfs_lib.sh: Cleanup local and remote directories setup Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:58 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-05-04 13:58 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2023-05-04 21:16 ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 21:16 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-05 10:42 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-05-05 10:42 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2023-05-05 10:44 ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-05 10:44 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] nfs_lib.sh: Unexport on proper side on netns Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] nfs05.sh: Lower down the default values Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] nfs03.sh: " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-05 12:56 ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-05 12:56 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] nfs: Run on btrfs, ext4, xfs Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 13:14 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 14:01 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-05-04 14:01 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2023-05-04 22:00 ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 22:00 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 22:02 ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 22:02 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-05-04 23:23 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2023-05-04 23:23 ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-05 11:08 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-05-05 11:08 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2023-05-05 12:59 ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-05 12:59 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230504232321.GA25208@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.