All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	xudong.hao@intel.com, zhenzhong.duan@intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, terrence.xu@intel.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, lulu@redhat.com, yanting.jiang@intel.com,
	joro@8bytes.org, nicolinc@nvidia.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	clegoate@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 06/24] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close()
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 15:52:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230612155207.51d8cf1d@omen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602121653.80017-7-yi.l.liu@intel.com>

On Fri,  2 Jun 2023 05:16:35 -0700
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> This avoids passing too much parameters in multiple functions. Per the
> input parameter change, rename the function to be vfio_df_open/close().
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/group.c     | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  8 ++++----
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> index b56e19d2a02d..caf53716ddb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> @@ -169,8 +169,9 @@ static void vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	spin_unlock(&device->group->kvm_ref_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
> +static int vfio_df_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> @@ -190,7 +191,11 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	if (device->open_count == 0)
>  		vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(device);
>  
> -	ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd);
> +	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
> +
> +	ret = vfio_df_open(df);
> +	if (ret)
> +		df->iommufd = NULL;
>  
>  	if (device->open_count == 0)
>  		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> @@ -202,12 +207,15 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device)
> +void vfio_df_group_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
>  	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
>  
> -	vfio_device_close(device, device->group->iommufd);
> +	vfio_df_close(df);
> +	df->iommufd = NULL;
>  
>  	if (device->open_count == 0)
>  		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> @@ -228,7 +236,7 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
>  		goto err_out;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = vfio_device_group_open(device);
> +	ret = vfio_df_group_open(df);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_free;
>  
> @@ -260,7 +268,7 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	return filep;
>  
>  err_close_device:
> -	vfio_device_group_close(device);
> +	vfio_df_group_close(df);
>  err_free:
>  	kfree(df);
>  err_out:
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> index 69e1a0692b06..f9eb52eb9ed7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> @@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ struct vfio_device_file {
>  	struct vfio_device *device;
>  	spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */
>  	struct kvm *kvm;
> +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd; /* protected by struct vfio_device_set::lock */
>  };
>  
>  void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
>  bool vfio_device_try_get_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
> -int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd);
> -void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
> -		       struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd);
> +int vfio_df_open(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> +void vfio_df_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
>  struct vfio_device_file *
>  vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device);
>  
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ void vfio_device_group_register(struct vfio_device *device);
>  void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device);
>  int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
>  void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
> -void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device);
> +void vfio_df_group_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
>  struct vfio_group *vfio_group_from_file(struct file *file);
>  bool vfio_group_enforced_coherent(struct vfio_group *group);
>  void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm);
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 8ef9210ad2aa..a3c5817fc545 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -434,9 +434,10 @@ vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	return df;
>  }
>  
> -static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
> -				  struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
> +static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd = df->iommufd;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
> @@ -468,9 +469,11 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
> -				   struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
> +static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)

Shouldn't these now be vfio_df_... functions too?  Thanks,

Ale

>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd = df->iommufd;
> +
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
>  
>  	if (device->ops->close_device)
> @@ -482,15 +485,16 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
>  	module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
>  }
>  
> -int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
> +int vfio_df_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
>  
>  	device->open_count++;
>  	if (device->open_count == 1) {
> -		ret = vfio_device_first_open(device, iommufd);
> +		ret = vfio_device_first_open(df);
>  		if (ret)
>  			device->open_count--;
>  	}
> @@ -498,14 +502,15 @@ int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
> -		       struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
> +void vfio_df_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
>  
>  	vfio_assert_device_open(device);
>  	if (device->open_count == 1)
> -		vfio_device_last_close(device, iommufd);
> +		vfio_device_last_close(df);
>  	device->open_count--;
>  }
>  
> @@ -550,7 +555,7 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>  	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
>  	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
>  
> -	vfio_device_group_close(device);
> +	vfio_df_group_close(df);
>  
>  	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
>  


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	xudong.hao@intel.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com,
	terrence.xu@intel.com, yanting.jiang@intel.com,
	zhenzhong.duan@intel.com, clegoate@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 06/24] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close()
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 15:52:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230612155207.51d8cf1d@omen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602121653.80017-7-yi.l.liu@intel.com>

On Fri,  2 Jun 2023 05:16:35 -0700
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> This avoids passing too much parameters in multiple functions. Per the
> input parameter change, rename the function to be vfio_df_open/close().
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/group.c     | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  8 ++++----
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> index b56e19d2a02d..caf53716ddb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> @@ -169,8 +169,9 @@ static void vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	spin_unlock(&device->group->kvm_ref_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
> +static int vfio_df_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> @@ -190,7 +191,11 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	if (device->open_count == 0)
>  		vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(device);
>  
> -	ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd);
> +	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
> +
> +	ret = vfio_df_open(df);
> +	if (ret)
> +		df->iommufd = NULL;
>  
>  	if (device->open_count == 0)
>  		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> @@ -202,12 +207,15 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device)
> +void vfio_df_group_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
>  	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
>  
> -	vfio_device_close(device, device->group->iommufd);
> +	vfio_df_close(df);
> +	df->iommufd = NULL;
>  
>  	if (device->open_count == 0)
>  		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> @@ -228,7 +236,7 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
>  		goto err_out;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = vfio_device_group_open(device);
> +	ret = vfio_df_group_open(df);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_free;
>  
> @@ -260,7 +268,7 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	return filep;
>  
>  err_close_device:
> -	vfio_device_group_close(device);
> +	vfio_df_group_close(df);
>  err_free:
>  	kfree(df);
>  err_out:
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> index 69e1a0692b06..f9eb52eb9ed7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> @@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ struct vfio_device_file {
>  	struct vfio_device *device;
>  	spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */
>  	struct kvm *kvm;
> +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd; /* protected by struct vfio_device_set::lock */
>  };
>  
>  void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
>  bool vfio_device_try_get_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
> -int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd);
> -void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
> -		       struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd);
> +int vfio_df_open(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> +void vfio_df_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
>  struct vfio_device_file *
>  vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device);
>  
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ void vfio_device_group_register(struct vfio_device *device);
>  void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device);
>  int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
>  void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
> -void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device);
> +void vfio_df_group_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
>  struct vfio_group *vfio_group_from_file(struct file *file);
>  bool vfio_group_enforced_coherent(struct vfio_group *group);
>  void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm);
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 8ef9210ad2aa..a3c5817fc545 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -434,9 +434,10 @@ vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device)
>  	return df;
>  }
>  
> -static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
> -				  struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
> +static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd = df->iommufd;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
> @@ -468,9 +469,11 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
> -				   struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
> +static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)

Shouldn't these now be vfio_df_... functions too?  Thanks,

Ale

>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd = df->iommufd;
> +
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
>  
>  	if (device->ops->close_device)
> @@ -482,15 +485,16 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
>  	module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
>  }
>  
> -int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
> +int vfio_df_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
>  
>  	device->open_count++;
>  	if (device->open_count == 1) {
> -		ret = vfio_device_first_open(device, iommufd);
> +		ret = vfio_device_first_open(df);
>  		if (ret)
>  			device->open_count--;
>  	}
> @@ -498,14 +502,15 @@ int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
> -		       struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
> +void vfio_df_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
>  
>  	vfio_assert_device_open(device);
>  	if (device->open_count == 1)
> -		vfio_device_last_close(device, iommufd);
> +		vfio_device_last_close(df);
>  	device->open_count--;
>  }
>  
> @@ -550,7 +555,7 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>  	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
>  	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
>  
> -	vfio_device_group_close(device);
> +	vfio_df_group_close(df);
>  
>  	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-12 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 180+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-02 12:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 00/24] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16 ` Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 01/24] vfio: Allocate per device file structure Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 02/24] vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 03/24] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 04/24] kvm/vfio: Prepare for accepting vfio device fd Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 05/24] kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 06/24] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close() Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-12 21:52   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2023-06-12 21:52     ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13  5:24     ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13  5:24       ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 07/24] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-12 21:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-12 21:52     ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13  5:46     ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13  5:46       ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:16       ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:16         ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:36         ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:36           ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:42           ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:42             ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:44             ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:44               ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 17:19         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-13 17:19           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-13 17:31           ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 17:31             ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 08/24] vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 09/24] vfio: Make vfio_df_open() single open for device cdev path Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 10/24] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat validation out of vfio_iommufd_bind() Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-22 17:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-22 17:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 11/24] vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-22 17:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-22 17:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 12/24] vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-22 18:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-22 18:00     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 13/24] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-23 14:04   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-23 14:04     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 14/24] iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-23 14:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-23 14:15     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-25 18:26     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicolin Chen
2023-06-25 18:26       ` Nicolin Chen
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 15/24] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-23 14:16   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-23 14:16     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 16/24] vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in unregister Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-23 14:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-23 14:22     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 17/24] vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-23 15:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-23 15:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 18/24] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-12 22:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-12 22:27     ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13  5:48     ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13  5:48       ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:18       ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:18         ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:28         ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:28           ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:39           ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:39             ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:42             ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:42               ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:59               ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:59                 ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-23 16:15   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-23 16:15     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-26  8:34     ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-26  8:34       ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-26 12:56       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-26 12:56         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-26 13:35         ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-26 13:35           ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-26 14:51           ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-26 14:51             ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-28 14:34             ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-28 14:34               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-28 14:41               ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-28 14:41                 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 19/24] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-23 16:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-23 16:21     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 20/24] vfio: Only check group->type for noiommu test Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-12 22:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-12 22:37     ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13  9:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13  9:20       ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 21/24] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev() Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-12 22:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-12 22:42     ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13  5:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13  5:53       ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:19       ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:19         ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:33         ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:33           ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:48           ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:48             ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 15:01             ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 15:01               ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 15:13               ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 17:15                 ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 17:35                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-13 17:35                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-13 20:10                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 20:10                       ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-14  3:24                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-14  3:24                         ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-14  5:42                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2023-06-14  5:42                           ` Tian, Kevin
2023-06-14  6:14                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-14  6:14                             ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-14  6:20                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2023-06-14  6:20                               ` Tian, Kevin
2023-06-14 12:23                               ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-14 12:23                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-14 13:12                                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-14 13:12                                   ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-14 17:30                                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-14 17:30                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 22/24] vfio: Remove vfio_device_is_noiommu() Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-12 22:46   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-12 22:46     ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 23/24] vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-23 16:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-23 16:35     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-02 12:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 24/24] docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description Yi Liu
2023-06-02 12:16   ` Yi Liu
2023-06-12 23:06   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-12 23:06     ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 12:01     ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 12:01       ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:24       ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:24         ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 14:48         ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 14:48           ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 15:04           ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 15:04             ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 15:11             ` [Intel-gfx] " Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 15:11               ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-13 17:30               ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2023-06-13 17:30                 ` Alex Williamson
2023-06-02 16:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support (rev15) Patchwork
2023-06-07  8:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 00/24] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Nicolin Chen
2023-06-07  8:27   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-06-08  6:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jiang, Yanting
2023-06-08  6:58   ` Jiang, Yanting
2023-06-09 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Rosato
2023-06-09 16:47   ` Matthew Rosato
2023-06-14 15:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support (rev16) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230612155207.51d8cf1d@omen \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=clegoate@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=terrence.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=yanting.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.