From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230627-adcb173b3ee813e2e16353bd@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47f0502d076c071260a87953cbabadfc85d278cf.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:11PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Only do the get/set tests on present and blessed registers
> since we don't know the capabilities of any new ones.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> index b956ee410996..3beb6b62de0a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ extern int vcpu_configs_n;
> for_each_reg_filtered(i) \
> if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
>
> +#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) \
> + for ((i) = 0; (i) < blessed_n; ++(i)) \
> + if (find_reg(reg_list->reg, reg_list->n, blessed_reg[i]))
> +
> static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> {
> struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
> @@ -189,6 +193,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> return;
> }
>
> + for_each_sublist(c, s)
> + blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> + blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> +
> + n = 0;
> + for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> + for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> + blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> + }
> +
> /*
> * We only test that we can get the register and then write back the
> * same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written
> @@ -198,8 +212,11 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should
> * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test
> * executable.
> + *
> + * Only do the get/set tests on present, blessed list registers,
> + * since we don't know the capabilities of any new registers.
> */
> - for_each_reg(i) {
> + for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) {
> uint8_t addr[2048 / 8];
> struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
> .id = reg_list->reg[i],
> @@ -242,16 +259,6 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> }
> }
>
> - for_each_sublist(c, s)
> - blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> - blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> -
> - n = 0;
> - for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> - for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> - blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> - }
> -
> for_each_new_reg(i)
> ++new_regs;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Thanks,
drew
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230627-adcb173b3ee813e2e16353bd@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47f0502d076c071260a87953cbabadfc85d278cf.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:11PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Only do the get/set tests on present and blessed registers
> since we don't know the capabilities of any new ones.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> index b956ee410996..3beb6b62de0a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ extern int vcpu_configs_n;
> for_each_reg_filtered(i) \
> if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
>
> +#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) \
> + for ((i) = 0; (i) < blessed_n; ++(i)) \
> + if (find_reg(reg_list->reg, reg_list->n, blessed_reg[i]))
> +
> static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> {
> struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
> @@ -189,6 +193,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> return;
> }
>
> + for_each_sublist(c, s)
> + blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> + blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> +
> + n = 0;
> + for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> + for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> + blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> + }
> +
> /*
> * We only test that we can get the register and then write back the
> * same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written
> @@ -198,8 +212,11 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should
> * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test
> * executable.
> + *
> + * Only do the get/set tests on present, blessed list registers,
> + * since we don't know the capabilities of any new registers.
> */
> - for_each_reg(i) {
> + for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) {
> uint8_t addr[2048 / 8];
> struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
> .id = reg_list->reg[i],
> @@ -242,16 +259,6 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> }
> }
>
> - for_each_sublist(c, s)
> - blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> - blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> -
> - n = 0;
> - for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> - for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> - blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> - }
> -
> for_each_new_reg(i)
> ++new_regs;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Thanks,
drew
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230627-adcb173b3ee813e2e16353bd@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47f0502d076c071260a87953cbabadfc85d278cf.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:11PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Only do the get/set tests on present and blessed registers
> since we don't know the capabilities of any new ones.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> index b956ee410996..3beb6b62de0a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ extern int vcpu_configs_n;
> for_each_reg_filtered(i) \
> if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
>
> +#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) \
> + for ((i) = 0; (i) < blessed_n; ++(i)) \
> + if (find_reg(reg_list->reg, reg_list->n, blessed_reg[i]))
> +
> static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> {
> struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
> @@ -189,6 +193,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> return;
> }
>
> + for_each_sublist(c, s)
> + blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> + blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> +
> + n = 0;
> + for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> + for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> + blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> + }
> +
> /*
> * We only test that we can get the register and then write back the
> * same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written
> @@ -198,8 +212,11 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should
> * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test
> * executable.
> + *
> + * Only do the get/set tests on present, blessed list registers,
> + * since we don't know the capabilities of any new registers.
> */
> - for_each_reg(i) {
> + for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) {
> uint8_t addr[2048 / 8];
> struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
> .id = reg_list->reg[i],
> @@ -242,16 +259,6 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> }
> }
>
> - for_each_sublist(c, s)
> - blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> - blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> -
> - n = 0;
> - for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> - for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> - blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> - }
> -
> for_each_new_reg(i)
> ++new_regs;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Thanks,
drew
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230627-adcb173b3ee813e2e16353bd@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47f0502d076c071260a87953cbabadfc85d278cf.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:11PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Only do the get/set tests on present and blessed registers
> since we don't know the capabilities of any new ones.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> index b956ee410996..3beb6b62de0a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ extern int vcpu_configs_n;
> for_each_reg_filtered(i) \
> if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
>
> +#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) \
> + for ((i) = 0; (i) < blessed_n; ++(i)) \
> + if (find_reg(reg_list->reg, reg_list->n, blessed_reg[i]))
> +
> static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> {
> struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
> @@ -189,6 +193,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> return;
> }
>
> + for_each_sublist(c, s)
> + blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> + blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> +
> + n = 0;
> + for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> + for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> + blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> + }
> +
> /*
> * We only test that we can get the register and then write back the
> * same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written
> @@ -198,8 +212,11 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should
> * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test
> * executable.
> + *
> + * Only do the get/set tests on present, blessed list registers,
> + * since we don't know the capabilities of any new registers.
> */
> - for_each_reg(i) {
> + for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) {
> uint8_t addr[2048 / 8];
> struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
> .id = reg_list->reg[i],
> @@ -242,16 +259,6 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> }
> }
>
> - for_each_sublist(c, s)
> - blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> - blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> -
> - n = 0;
> - for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> - for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> - blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> - }
> -
> for_each_new_reg(i)
> ++new_regs;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Thanks,
drew
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-27 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-23 10:40 [PATCH v4 00/12] RISCV: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Replace str_with_index with strdup_printf Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Drop SVE cap check in print_reg Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove print_reg's dependency on vcpu_config Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Rename vcpu_config and add to kvm_util.h Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Delete core_reg_fixup Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Split get-reg-list test code Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Finish generalizing get-reg-list Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move reject_set check logic to a function Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-27 9:09 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:09 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:09 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:09 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-28 5:58 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 5:58 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 5:58 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 5:58 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-27 9:11 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2023-06-27 9:11 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:11 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:11 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-28 6:00 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 6:00 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 6:00 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 6:00 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: riscv: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API support Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add finalize_vcpu check in run_test Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-27 9:16 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:16 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:16 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:16 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-28 10:29 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:29 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:29 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:29 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add get-reg-list test Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-23 10:40 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-27 9:25 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:25 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:25 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-27 9:25 ` Andrew Jones
2023-06-28 10:28 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:28 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:28 ` Haibo Xu
2023-06-28 10:28 ` Haibo Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230627-adcb173b3ee813e2e16353bd@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.