From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
leiyang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx5_vdpa: offer VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 02:15:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230705021447-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEtBjTmChSQX_E_n6yvTi9rxH5UrXgfAU5qZsFAF-RZQWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 01:47:44PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 1:31 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 01:11:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 6:16 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:26:02PM -0700, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/3/2023 8:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:25:14PM +0200, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > > > > > > Offer this backend feature as mlx5 is compatible with it. It allows it
> > > > > > > to do live migration with CVQ, dynamically switching between passthrough
> > > > > > > and shadow virtqueue.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> > > > > > Same comment.
> > > > > to which?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Siwei
> > > >
> > > > VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK is too narrow a use-case to commit to it
> > > > as a kernel/userspace ABI: what if one wants to start rings in some
> > > > other specific order?
> > >
> > > Just enable a queue by writing e.g 1 to queue_enable in a specific order?
> >
> >
> > But then at driver ok time we don't know how many queues are there.
>
> There should be a device specific interface for this, for example,
> num_queue_paris. So the device knows at most how many queues there
> are. Or anything I miss?
That's a device limitations. Does not tell the device how much is used.
> >
> > > > As was discussed on list, a better promise is not to access ring
> > > > until the 1st kick. vdpa can then do a kick when it wants
> > > > the device to start accessing rings.
> > >
> > > Rethink about the ACCESS_AFTER_KICK, it sounds functional equivalent
> > > to allow queue_enable after DRIVER_OK, but it seems to have
> > > distanvages:
> > >
> > > A busy polling software device may disable notifications and never
> > > respond to register to any kick notifiers. ACCESS_AFTER_KICK will
> > > introduce overhead to those implementations.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > It's just the 1st kick, then you can disable. No?
>
> Yes, but:
>
> 1) adding hooks for queue_enable
> 2) adding new codes to register event notifier and toggle the notifier
>
> 1) seems much easier? Or for most devices, it already behaves like this.
>
> Thanks
Well libvhostuser checks enabled queues at DRIVER_OK, does it not?
> >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > > > > index 9138ef2fb2c8..5f309a16b9dc 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > > > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > > > > > > #include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
> > > > > > > #include <uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h>
> > > > > > > #include <uapi/linux/vdpa.h>
> > > > > > > +#include <uapi/linux/vhost_types.h>
> > > > > > > #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> > > > > > > #include <linux/auxiliary_bus.h>
> > > > > > > #include <linux/mlx5/cq.h>
> > > > > > > @@ -2499,6 +2500,11 @@ static void unregister_link_notifier(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
> > > > > > > flush_workqueue(ndev->mvdev.wq);
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > +static u64 mlx5_vdpa_get_backend_features(const struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > + return BIT_ULL(VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > static int mlx5_vdpa_set_driver_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev = to_mvdev(vdev);
> > > > > > > @@ -3140,6 +3146,7 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops mlx5_vdpa_ops = {
> > > > > > > .get_vq_align = mlx5_vdpa_get_vq_align,
> > > > > > > .get_vq_group = mlx5_vdpa_get_vq_group,
> > > > > > > .get_device_features = mlx5_vdpa_get_device_features,
> > > > > > > + .get_backend_features = mlx5_vdpa_get_backend_features,
> > > > > > > .set_driver_features = mlx5_vdpa_set_driver_features,
> > > > > > > .get_driver_features = mlx5_vdpa_get_driver_features,
> > > > > > > .set_config_cb = mlx5_vdpa_set_config_cb,
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 2.39.3
> > > >
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Si-Wei Liu" <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Dragos Tatulea" <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, leiyang@redhat.com,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx5_vdpa: offer VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 02:15:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230705021447-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEtBjTmChSQX_E_n6yvTi9rxH5UrXgfAU5qZsFAF-RZQWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 01:47:44PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 1:31 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 01:11:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 6:16 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:26:02PM -0700, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/3/2023 8:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:25:14PM +0200, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > > > > > > Offer this backend feature as mlx5 is compatible with it. It allows it
> > > > > > > to do live migration with CVQ, dynamically switching between passthrough
> > > > > > > and shadow virtqueue.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> > > > > > Same comment.
> > > > > to which?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Siwei
> > > >
> > > > VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK is too narrow a use-case to commit to it
> > > > as a kernel/userspace ABI: what if one wants to start rings in some
> > > > other specific order?
> > >
> > > Just enable a queue by writing e.g 1 to queue_enable in a specific order?
> >
> >
> > But then at driver ok time we don't know how many queues are there.
>
> There should be a device specific interface for this, for example,
> num_queue_paris. So the device knows at most how many queues there
> are. Or anything I miss?
That's a device limitations. Does not tell the device how much is used.
> >
> > > > As was discussed on list, a better promise is not to access ring
> > > > until the 1st kick. vdpa can then do a kick when it wants
> > > > the device to start accessing rings.
> > >
> > > Rethink about the ACCESS_AFTER_KICK, it sounds functional equivalent
> > > to allow queue_enable after DRIVER_OK, but it seems to have
> > > distanvages:
> > >
> > > A busy polling software device may disable notifications and never
> > > respond to register to any kick notifiers. ACCESS_AFTER_KICK will
> > > introduce overhead to those implementations.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > It's just the 1st kick, then you can disable. No?
>
> Yes, but:
>
> 1) adding hooks for queue_enable
> 2) adding new codes to register event notifier and toggle the notifier
>
> 1) seems much easier? Or for most devices, it already behaves like this.
>
> Thanks
Well libvhostuser checks enabled queues at DRIVER_OK, does it not?
> >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > > > > index 9138ef2fb2c8..5f309a16b9dc 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > > > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > > > > > > #include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
> > > > > > > #include <uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h>
> > > > > > > #include <uapi/linux/vdpa.h>
> > > > > > > +#include <uapi/linux/vhost_types.h>
> > > > > > > #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> > > > > > > #include <linux/auxiliary_bus.h>
> > > > > > > #include <linux/mlx5/cq.h>
> > > > > > > @@ -2499,6 +2500,11 @@ static void unregister_link_notifier(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
> > > > > > > flush_workqueue(ndev->mvdev.wq);
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > +static u64 mlx5_vdpa_get_backend_features(const struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > + return BIT_ULL(VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > static int mlx5_vdpa_set_driver_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev = to_mvdev(vdev);
> > > > > > > @@ -3140,6 +3146,7 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops mlx5_vdpa_ops = {
> > > > > > > .get_vq_align = mlx5_vdpa_get_vq_align,
> > > > > > > .get_vq_group = mlx5_vdpa_get_vq_group,
> > > > > > > .get_device_features = mlx5_vdpa_get_device_features,
> > > > > > > + .get_backend_features = mlx5_vdpa_get_backend_features,
> > > > > > > .set_driver_features = mlx5_vdpa_set_driver_features,
> > > > > > > .get_driver_features = mlx5_vdpa_get_driver_features,
> > > > > > > .set_config_cb = mlx5_vdpa_set_config_cb,
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 2.39.3
> > > >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-05 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-03 14:25 [PATCH] mlx5_vdpa: offer VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-03 15:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-03 15:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-04 0:26 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-07-04 0:26 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-07-04 10:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-04 10:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-05 5:11 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-05 5:11 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-05 5:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-05 5:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-05 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-05 5:47 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-05 6:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-07-05 6:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-05 7:32 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-05 7:32 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-04 12:56 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-04 16:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-04 16:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-04 17:22 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230705021447-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=leiyang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.