From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based TRBE devices
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 05:43:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202308140529.wEpy3fPK-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230803055652.1322801-5-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Hi Anshuman,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on arm/for-next soc/for-next linus/master arm/fixes v6.5-rc5 next-20230809]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm_pmu-acpi-Refactor-arm_spe_acpi_register_device/20230803-135907
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803055652.1322801-5-anshuman.khandual%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH V3 4/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based TRBE devices
config: arm64-randconfig-r071-20230813 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230814/202308140529.wEpy3fPK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230814/202308140529.wEpy3fPK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308140529.wEpy3fPK-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c:1549:21: error: 'arm_trbe_acpi_match' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'arm_trbe_of_match'?
1549 | .id_table = arm_trbe_acpi_match,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| arm_trbe_of_match
vim +1549 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
1547
1548 static struct platform_driver arm_trbe_driver = {
> 1549 .id_table = arm_trbe_acpi_match,
1550 .driver = {
1551 .name = DRVNAME,
1552 .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(arm_trbe_of_match),
1553 .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
1554 },
1555 .probe = arm_trbe_device_probe,
1556 .remove = arm_trbe_device_remove,
1557 };
1558
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based TRBE devices
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 05:43:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202308140529.wEpy3fPK-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230803055652.1322801-5-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Hi Anshuman,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on arm/for-next soc/for-next linus/master arm/fixes v6.5-rc5 next-20230809]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anshuman-Khandual/arm_pmu-acpi-Refactor-arm_spe_acpi_register_device/20230803-135907
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803055652.1322801-5-anshuman.khandual%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH V3 4/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based TRBE devices
config: arm64-randconfig-r071-20230813 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230814/202308140529.wEpy3fPK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230814/202308140529.wEpy3fPK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308140529.wEpy3fPK-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c:1549:21: error: 'arm_trbe_acpi_match' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'arm_trbe_of_match'?
1549 | .id_table = arm_trbe_acpi_match,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| arm_trbe_of_match
vim +1549 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
1547
1548 static struct platform_driver arm_trbe_driver = {
> 1549 .id_table = arm_trbe_acpi_match,
1550 .driver = {
1551 .name = DRVNAME,
1552 .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(arm_trbe_of_match),
1553 .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
1554 },
1555 .probe = arm_trbe_device_probe,
1556 .remove = arm_trbe_device_remove,
1557 };
1558
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-13 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-03 5:56 [PATCH V3 0/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based devices Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 5:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 5:56 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Refactor arm_spe_acpi_register_device() Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 5:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 6:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 6:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-04 16:39 ` Will Deacon
2023-08-04 16:39 ` Will Deacon
2023-08-07 5:33 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-07 5:33 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-08 13:21 ` Will Deacon
2023-08-08 13:21 ` Will Deacon
2023-08-09 7:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-09 7:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 5:56 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform device for TRBE Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 5:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 9:14 ` Yicong Yang
2023-08-03 9:14 ` Yicong Yang
2023-08-04 9:34 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-04 9:34 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-04 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-04 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 5:56 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] coresight: trbe: Add a representative coresight_platform_data " Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 5:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 13:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-03 13:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-04 9:18 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-04 9:18 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-04 10:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-04 10:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-03 5:56 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] coresight: trbe: Enable ACPI based TRBE devices Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-03 5:56 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-07 4:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-07 4:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-07 11:37 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-07 11:37 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-07 11:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-07 11:58 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-13 21:43 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-08-13 21:43 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202308140529.wEpy3fPK-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.