All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Maintainer burnout
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:10:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822-komitee-erreichbar-4dff01dec543@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822094613.bxtsjlnkhaypoflj@quack3>

> I agree it is good to create positive incentives to provide good review.
> But I believe what really makes people do good reviews is the sense of
> common responsibility - you don't want buggy or misdesigned stuff to get
> into the subsystem you work with because that's going to make life harder
> for everybody including you in the future. And I understand the "tragedy of

Yes, this is a Herculean task and often just results in complaints that
this is unnecessary non-technical pushback.

> commons" (IOW selfishness) works against this so incentives or
> review-trading or other methods can help but ultimately it is IMHO about
> making people understand and accept this shared responsibility...

Yes, but in order to encourage and incentivize shared responsibility the
environment must feel sufficiently safe and have a good model of shared
ownership. I think we often still have deficits in both (with
differences between subsystems).

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-22 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-16 18:08 [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Maintainer burnout Josef Bacik
2023-08-16 20:14 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-08-17  9:39   ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-17 12:36     ` Andrew Lunn
2023-08-17 15:19       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-17 23:54         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-08-18 13:55           ` Linus Walleij
2023-08-18 15:09             ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-18 17:07               ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-19  6:45                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-21 15:35                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-22  7:41                     ` Jiri Kosina
2023-08-22  9:05                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-08-22 10:13                         ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-22 11:25                           ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-21 19:23                   ` Vegard Nossum
2023-08-22  4:07                     ` Dave Airlie
2023-08-22  9:46                     ` Jan Kara
2023-08-22 10:10                       ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2023-08-22 10:20                         ` Jan Kara
2023-08-22 11:29                         ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-22 11:05                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-22 11:32                         ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-22 13:47                           ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-22 13:30                         ` Jan Kara
2023-08-29 12:54                     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-13  9:02                     ` Dan Carpenter
2023-08-21  8:50                 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-08-21 15:18                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-22  4:12                   ` Dave Airlie
2023-08-18 15:26             ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-18 15:40               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2023-08-18 18:36                 ` Mark Brown
2023-08-21 16:13                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-18 16:10               ` Mark Brown
2023-08-21 16:04                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-24 21:30               ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-08-25  7:05                 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-08-17 12:00   ` Jani Nikula
2023-08-17 12:17     ` Mark Brown
2023-08-17 12:42       ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-17 13:56         ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-08-17 15:03           ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-17 17:41             ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-08-18 15:30               ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-18 16:23                 ` Mark Brown
2023-08-18 17:17                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-08-18 18:00                     ` Mark Brown
2023-08-17 14:46         ` Mark Brown
2023-08-17 14:22     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-17 15:31       ` Jani Nikula
2023-08-17 14:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-08-17 15:33   ` Josef Bacik
2023-08-17 17:10     ` Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230822-komitee-erreichbar-4dff01dec543@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.