From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a type for the STE
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:00:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231013140028.GA352534@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013103734.GA13594@willie-the-truck>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:37:35AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > -static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
> > +static struct arm_smmu_ste *
> > +arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
> > {
> > - __le64 *step;
> > struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
> >
> > if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> > - struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc *l1_desc;
> > int idx;
> >
> > /* Two-level walk */
> > idx = (sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT) * STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS;
> > - l1_desc = &cfg->l1_desc[idx];
> > - idx = (sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)) * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS;
> > - step = &l1_desc->l2ptr[idx];
> > + return &cfg->l1_desc[idx].l2ptr[sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)];
> > } else {
> > /* Simple linear lookup */
> > - step = &cfg->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
> > + return (struct arm_smmu_ste *)&cfg
> > + ->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
>
> Why not change the type of 'struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg::strtab' at the same
> time?
It doesn't always point at a STE.
arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl() sets strtab to:
l1size = cfg->num_l1_ents * (STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
strtab = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, l1size, &cfg->strtab_dma,
GFP_KERNEL);
cfg->strtab = strtab;
And arm_smmu_init_strtab_linear() sets strtab to:
size = (1 << smmu->sid_bits) * (STRTAB_STE_DWORDS << 3);
strtab = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size, &cfg->strtab_dma,
GFP_KERNEL);
cfg->strtab = strtab;
I can add this patch if you like immediately after:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index d5ba85034c1386..bdb559878615b8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1559,7 +1559,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
return 0;
size = 1 << (STRTAB_SPLIT + ilog2(STRTAB_STE_DWORDS) + 3);
- strtab = &cfg->strtab[(sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT) * STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS];
+ strtab = &cfg->strtab.l1_desc[sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT];
desc->span = STRTAB_SPLIT + 1;
desc->l2ptr = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size, &desc->l2ptr_dma,
@@ -2347,8 +2347,7 @@ arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
return &cfg->l1_desc[idx].l2ptr[sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)];
} else {
/* Simple linear lookup */
- return (struct arm_smmu_ste *)&cfg
- ->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
+ return &cfg->strtab.linear[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
}
}
@@ -3421,17 +3420,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l1_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
unsigned int i;
struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
- void *strtab = smmu->strtab_cfg.strtab;
cfg->l1_desc = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, cfg->num_l1_ents,
sizeof(*cfg->l1_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cfg->l1_desc)
return -ENOMEM;
- for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_l1_ents; ++i) {
- arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc(strtab, &cfg->l1_desc[i]);
- strtab += STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_l1_ents; ++i)
+ arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc(
+ &smmu->strtab_cfg.strtab.l1_desc[i], &cfg->l1_desc[i]);
return 0;
}
@@ -3463,7 +3460,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
l1size);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- cfg->strtab = strtab;
+ cfg->strtab.l1_desc = strtab;
/* Configure strtab_base_cfg for 2 levels */
reg = FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_BASE_CFG_FMT, STRTAB_BASE_CFG_FMT_2LVL);
@@ -3490,7 +3487,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_linear(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
size);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- cfg->strtab = strtab;
+ cfg->strtab.linear = strtab;
cfg->num_l1_ents = 1 << smmu->sid_bits;
/* Configure strtab_base_cfg for a linear table covering all SIDs */
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index 74f6f9e28c6e84..6d75adb1a72b4f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -620,7 +620,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg {
};
struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg {
- __le64 *strtab;
+ union {
+ struct arm_smmu_ste *linear;
+ __le64 *l1_desc;
+ } strtab;
dma_addr_t strtab_dma;
struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc *l1_desc;
unsigned int num_l1_ents;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a type for the STE
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:00:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231013140028.GA352534@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013103734.GA13594@willie-the-truck>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:37:35AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > -static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
> > +static struct arm_smmu_ste *
> > +arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
> > {
> > - __le64 *step;
> > struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
> >
> > if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_2_LVL_STRTAB) {
> > - struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc *l1_desc;
> > int idx;
> >
> > /* Two-level walk */
> > idx = (sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT) * STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS;
> > - l1_desc = &cfg->l1_desc[idx];
> > - idx = (sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)) * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS;
> > - step = &l1_desc->l2ptr[idx];
> > + return &cfg->l1_desc[idx].l2ptr[sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)];
> > } else {
> > /* Simple linear lookup */
> > - step = &cfg->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
> > + return (struct arm_smmu_ste *)&cfg
> > + ->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
>
> Why not change the type of 'struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg::strtab' at the same
> time?
It doesn't always point at a STE.
arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl() sets strtab to:
l1size = cfg->num_l1_ents * (STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
strtab = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, l1size, &cfg->strtab_dma,
GFP_KERNEL);
cfg->strtab = strtab;
And arm_smmu_init_strtab_linear() sets strtab to:
size = (1 << smmu->sid_bits) * (STRTAB_STE_DWORDS << 3);
strtab = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size, &cfg->strtab_dma,
GFP_KERNEL);
cfg->strtab = strtab;
I can add this patch if you like immediately after:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index d5ba85034c1386..bdb559878615b8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1559,7 +1559,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
return 0;
size = 1 << (STRTAB_SPLIT + ilog2(STRTAB_STE_DWORDS) + 3);
- strtab = &cfg->strtab[(sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT) * STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS];
+ strtab = &cfg->strtab.l1_desc[sid >> STRTAB_SPLIT];
desc->span = STRTAB_SPLIT + 1;
desc->l2ptr = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size, &desc->l2ptr_dma,
@@ -2347,8 +2347,7 @@ arm_smmu_get_step_for_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
return &cfg->l1_desc[idx].l2ptr[sid & ((1 << STRTAB_SPLIT) - 1)];
} else {
/* Simple linear lookup */
- return (struct arm_smmu_ste *)&cfg
- ->strtab[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
+ return &cfg->strtab.linear[sid * STRTAB_STE_DWORDS];
}
}
@@ -3421,17 +3420,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l1_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
unsigned int i;
struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
- void *strtab = smmu->strtab_cfg.strtab;
cfg->l1_desc = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, cfg->num_l1_ents,
sizeof(*cfg->l1_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cfg->l1_desc)
return -ENOMEM;
- for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_l1_ents; ++i) {
- arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc(strtab, &cfg->l1_desc[i]);
- strtab += STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_l1_ents; ++i)
+ arm_smmu_write_strtab_l1_desc(
+ &smmu->strtab_cfg.strtab.l1_desc[i], &cfg->l1_desc[i]);
return 0;
}
@@ -3463,7 +3460,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
l1size);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- cfg->strtab = strtab;
+ cfg->strtab.l1_desc = strtab;
/* Configure strtab_base_cfg for 2 levels */
reg = FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_BASE_CFG_FMT, STRTAB_BASE_CFG_FMT_2LVL);
@@ -3490,7 +3487,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_linear(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
size);
return -ENOMEM;
}
- cfg->strtab = strtab;
+ cfg->strtab.linear = strtab;
cfg->num_l1_ents = 1 << smmu->sid_bits;
/* Configure strtab_base_cfg for a linear table covering all SIDs */
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index 74f6f9e28c6e84..6d75adb1a72b4f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -620,7 +620,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg {
};
struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg {
- __le64 *strtab;
+ union {
+ struct arm_smmu_ste *linear;
+ __le64 *l1_desc;
+ } strtab;
dma_addr_t strtab_dma;
struct arm_smmu_strtab_l1_desc *l1_desc;
unsigned int num_l1_ents;
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-13 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 134+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 0:33 [PATCH 00/19] Update SMMUv3 to the modern iommu API (part 1/2) Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 01/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a type for the STE Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-13 10:37 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-13 10:37 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-13 14:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-10-13 14:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 02/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Master cannot be NULL in arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 03/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 04/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make STE programming independent of the callers Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 8:10 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-12 8:10 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-12 12:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 12:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 11:05 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-18 11:05 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-18 13:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 13:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-20 8:23 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-20 8:23 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-20 11:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-20 11:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-23 8:36 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-23 8:36 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-23 12:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-23 12:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-15 20:26 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-15 20:26 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-17 13:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-17 13:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-18 12:35 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-18 12:35 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-18 12:42 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-18 12:42 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-19 13:42 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-19 13:42 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-25 12:17 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-25 12:17 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-25 12:58 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-25 12:58 ` Michael Shavit
2023-12-27 15:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-27 15:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-27 15:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-27 15:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-02 8:08 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-02 8:08 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-02 14:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-02 14:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-03 16:52 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-03 16:52 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-03 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-03 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-06 8:36 ` [PATCH] " Michael Shavit
2024-01-06 8:36 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-06 8:36 ` [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make CD programming use arm_smmu_write_entry_step() Michael Shavit
2024-01-06 8:36 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-10 13:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-10 13:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-06 8:36 ` [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add unit tests for arm_smmu_write_entry Michael Shavit
2024-01-06 8:36 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-12 16:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-12 16:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-16 9:23 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-16 9:23 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-10 13:10 ` [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make STE programming independent of the callers Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-10 13:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-06 8:50 ` [PATCH 04/19] " Michael Shavit
2024-01-06 8:50 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-12 19:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-12 19:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-03 15:42 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-03 15:42 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-03 15:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-03 15:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-03 16:47 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-03 16:47 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-02 8:13 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-02 8:13 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-02 14:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-02 14:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 10:54 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-18 10:54 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-18 12:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 12:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-19 23:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-19 23:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 05/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Consolidate the STE generation for abort/bypass Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 06/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 07/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 08/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Build the whole STE in arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 09/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Hold arm_smmu_asid_lock during all of attach_dev Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-24 2:44 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-24 2:44 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-24 2:48 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-24 2:48 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-24 11:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-24 11:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 10/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Compute the STE only once for each master Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 11/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not change the STE twice during arm_smmu_attach_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 12/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Put writing the context descriptor in the right order Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 9:01 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-12 9:01 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-12 12:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 12:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 13/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass smmu_domain to arm_enable/disable_ats() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 14/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove arm_smmu_master->domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 15/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static IDENTITY domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 11:06 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-18 11:06 ` Michael Shavit
2023-10-18 12:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-18 12:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 16/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static BLOCKED domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 17/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the identity/blocked domain during release Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 18/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass arm_smmu_domain and arm_smmu_device to finalize Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` [PATCH 19/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231013140028.GA352534@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.