All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, kw@linux.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
	minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, robh@kernel.org,
	roy.zang@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_*
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 23:03:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231102173314.GE20943@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017193145.3198380-4-Frank.Li@nxp.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 03:31:44PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> 'pf' and 'lut' is just difference name in difference chips, but basic it is
> a MMIO base address plus an offset.
> 
> Rename it to avoid duplicate pf_* and lut_* in driver.
> 

"pci-layerscape-ep.c" uses "ls_lut_" prefix and now you are using "pf_lut_". May
I know the difference between these two? Can we just use a common name?

- Mani

> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     change from v1 to v3
>     - new patch at v3
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 34 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index 6f47cfe146c44..4b663b20d8612 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
>  #define LS_PCIE_DRV_SCFG	BIT(0)
>  
>  struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> -	const u32 pf_off;
> +	const u32 pf_lut_off;
>  	const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
>  	int (*exit_from_l2)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
>  	int flags;
> @@ -56,13 +56,13 @@ struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
>  struct ls_pcie {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
>  	const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> -	void __iomem *pf_base;
> +	void __iomem *pf_lut_base;
>  	struct regmap *scfg;
>  	int index;
>  	bool big_endian;
>  };
>  
> -#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
> +#define ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, addr)
>  #define to_ls_pcie(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>  
>  static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -103,20 +103,20 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>  	iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
>  }
>  
> -static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +static u32 ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
>  {
>  	if (pcie->big_endian)
> -		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  
> -	return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +	return ioread32(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  }
>  
> -static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +static void ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
>  {
>  	if (pcie->big_endian)
> -		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  	else
> -		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  }
>  
>  static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> @@ -126,11 +126,11 @@ static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  	u32 val;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
>  	val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
> -	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>  
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
>  				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR),
>  				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
>  				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US);
> @@ -149,15 +149,15 @@ static int ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  	 * Set PF_MCR_EXL2S bit in LS_PCIE_PF_MCR register for the link
>  	 * to exit L2 state.
>  	 */
> -	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
>  	val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
> -	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * L2 exit timeout of 10ms is not defined in the specifications,
>  	 * it was chosen based on empirical observations.
>  	 */
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
>  				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S),
>  				 1000,
>  				 10000);
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
> -	.pf_off = 0xc0000,
> +	.pf_lut_off = 0xc0000,
>  	.pm_support = true,
>  	.exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
>  };
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
>  
> -	pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> +	pcie->pf_lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_lut_off;
>  
>  	if (pcie->drvdata->flags & LS_PCIE_DRV_SCFG) {
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, kw@linux.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	lpieralisi@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, roy.zang@nxp.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_*
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 23:03:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231102173314.GE20943@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017193145.3198380-4-Frank.Li@nxp.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 03:31:44PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> 'pf' and 'lut' is just difference name in difference chips, but basic it is
> a MMIO base address plus an offset.
> 
> Rename it to avoid duplicate pf_* and lut_* in driver.
> 

"pci-layerscape-ep.c" uses "ls_lut_" prefix and now you are using "pf_lut_". May
I know the difference between these two? Can we just use a common name?

- Mani

> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     change from v1 to v3
>     - new patch at v3
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 34 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index 6f47cfe146c44..4b663b20d8612 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
>  #define LS_PCIE_DRV_SCFG	BIT(0)
>  
>  struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> -	const u32 pf_off;
> +	const u32 pf_lut_off;
>  	const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
>  	int (*exit_from_l2)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
>  	int flags;
> @@ -56,13 +56,13 @@ struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
>  struct ls_pcie {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
>  	const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> -	void __iomem *pf_base;
> +	void __iomem *pf_lut_base;
>  	struct regmap *scfg;
>  	int index;
>  	bool big_endian;
>  };
>  
> -#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
> +#define ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, addr)
>  #define to_ls_pcie(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>  
>  static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -103,20 +103,20 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>  	iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
>  }
>  
> -static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +static u32 ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
>  {
>  	if (pcie->big_endian)
> -		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  
> -	return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +	return ioread32(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  }
>  
> -static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +static void ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
>  {
>  	if (pcie->big_endian)
> -		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  	else
> -		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  }
>  
>  static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> @@ -126,11 +126,11 @@ static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  	u32 val;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
>  	val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
> -	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>  
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
>  				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR),
>  				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
>  				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US);
> @@ -149,15 +149,15 @@ static int ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  	 * Set PF_MCR_EXL2S bit in LS_PCIE_PF_MCR register for the link
>  	 * to exit L2 state.
>  	 */
> -	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
>  	val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
> -	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * L2 exit timeout of 10ms is not defined in the specifications,
>  	 * it was chosen based on empirical observations.
>  	 */
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
>  				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S),
>  				 1000,
>  				 10000);
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
> -	.pf_off = 0xc0000,
> +	.pf_lut_off = 0xc0000,
>  	.pm_support = true,
>  	.exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
>  };
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
>  
> -	pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> +	pcie->pf_lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_lut_off;
>  
>  	if (pcie->drvdata->flags & LS_PCIE_DRV_SCFG) {
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, kw@linux.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
	minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, robh@kernel.org,
	roy.zang@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_*
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 23:03:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231102173314.GE20943@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017193145.3198380-4-Frank.Li@nxp.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 03:31:44PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> 'pf' and 'lut' is just difference name in difference chips, but basic it is
> a MMIO base address plus an offset.
> 
> Rename it to avoid duplicate pf_* and lut_* in driver.
> 

"pci-layerscape-ep.c" uses "ls_lut_" prefix and now you are using "pf_lut_". May
I know the difference between these two? Can we just use a common name?

- Mani

> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     change from v1 to v3
>     - new patch at v3
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 34 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index 6f47cfe146c44..4b663b20d8612 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
>  #define LS_PCIE_DRV_SCFG	BIT(0)
>  
>  struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
> -	const u32 pf_off;
> +	const u32 pf_lut_off;
>  	const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
>  	int (*exit_from_l2)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
>  	int flags;
> @@ -56,13 +56,13 @@ struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
>  struct ls_pcie {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
>  	const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
> -	void __iomem *pf_base;
> +	void __iomem *pf_lut_base;
>  	struct regmap *scfg;
>  	int index;
>  	bool big_endian;
>  };
>  
> -#define ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, addr)
> +#define ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr(addr)	ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, addr)
>  #define to_ls_pcie(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>  
>  static bool ls_pcie_is_bridge(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -103,20 +103,20 @@ static void ls_pcie_fix_error_response(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>  	iowrite32(PCIE_ABSERR_SETTING, pci->dbi_base + PCIE_ABSERR);
>  }
>  
> -static u32 ls_pcie_pf_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +static u32 ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
>  {
>  	if (pcie->big_endian)
> -		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		return ioread32be(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  
> -	return ioread32(pcie->pf_base + off);
> +	return ioread32(pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  }
>  
> -static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +static void ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
>  {
>  	if (pcie->big_endian)
> -		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		iowrite32be(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  	else
> -		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
> +		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_lut_base + off);
>  }
>  
>  static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> @@ -126,11 +126,11 @@ static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  	u32 val;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
>  	val |= PF_MCR_PTOMR;
> -	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>  
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
>  				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_PTOMR),
>  				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
>  				 PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US);
> @@ -149,15 +149,15 @@ static int ls_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  	 * Set PF_MCR_EXL2S bit in LS_PCIE_PF_MCR register for the link
>  	 * to exit L2 state.
>  	 */
> -	val = ls_pcie_pf_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
> +	val = ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR);
>  	val |= PF_MCR_EXL2S;
> -	ls_pcie_pf_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
> +	ls_pcie_pf_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR, val);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * L2 exit timeout of 10ms is not defined in the specifications,
>  	 * it was chosen based on empirical observations.
>  	 */
> -	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
> +	ret = readx_poll_timeout(ls_pcie_pf_lut_readl_addr, LS_PCIE_PF_MCR,
>  				 val, !(val & PF_MCR_EXL2S),
>  				 1000,
>  				 10000);
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
> -	.pf_off = 0xc0000,
> +	.pf_lut_off = 0xc0000,
>  	.pm_support = true,
>  	.exit_from_l2 = ls_pcie_exit_from_l2,
>  };
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
>  
> -	pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> +	pcie->pf_lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_lut_off;
>  
>  	if (pcie->drvdata->flags & LS_PCIE_DRV_SCFG) {
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-17 19:31 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI: layerscape: Add suspend/resume support for ls1043 and ls1021 Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31 ` Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31 ` Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: layerscape: Add function pointer for exit_from_l2() Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31   ` Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31   ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 16:58   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 16:58     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 16:58     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 18:01     ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 18:01       ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 18:01       ` Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: layerscape: Add suspend/resume for ls1021a Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31   ` Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31   ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 17:28   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 17:28     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 17:28     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 18:14     ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 18:14       ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 18:14       ` Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI: layerscape: Rename pf_* as pf_lut_* Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31   ` Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31   ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 17:33   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-11-02 17:33     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 17:33     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 18:21     ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 18:21       ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 18:21       ` Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI: layerscape: Add suspend/resume for ls1043a Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31   ` Frank Li
2023-10-17 19:31   ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 17:39   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 17:39     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 17:39     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-11-02 18:29     ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 18:29       ` Frank Li
2023-11-02 18:29       ` Frank Li
2023-10-27 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI: layerscape: Add suspend/resume support for ls1043 and ls1021 Frank Li
2023-10-27 16:27   ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231102173314.GE20943@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=minghuan.Lian@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.