From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: arm64: Force guest's HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 when NV1 is not implemented
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:45:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231127114559.990314-14-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231127114559.990314-1-maz@kernel.org>
If NV1 isn't supported on a system, make sure we always evaluate
the guest's HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1, irrespective of what the guest
may have written there.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 12 +++++++++++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 78a550537b67..7b10a44189d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -213,7 +213,8 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_el2(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static inline bool __vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
{
- return ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, HCR_EL2) & HCR_E2H;
+ return (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HCR_NV1_RES0) ||
+ (ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, HCR_EL2) & HCR_E2H));
}
static inline bool vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index ff2e66f0bda1..9e1e3da2ed4a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2022,6 +2022,16 @@ static bool access_spsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return true;
}
+static u64 reset_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ u64 val = r->val;
+
+ if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HCR_NV1_RES0))
+ val |= HCR_E2H;
+
+ return __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
+}
+
/*
* Architected system registers.
* Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
@@ -2513,7 +2523,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
EL2_REG(VMPIDR_EL2, access_rw, reset_unknown, 0),
EL2_REG(SCTLR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, SCTLR_EL2_RES1),
EL2_REG(ACTLR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
- EL2_REG(HCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
+ EL2_REG(HCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_hcr, 0),
EL2_REG(MDCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(CPTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, CPTR_NVHE_EL2_RES1),
EL2_REG(HSTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
--
2.39.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: arm64: Force guest's HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 when NV1 is not implemented
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:45:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231127114559.990314-14-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231127114559.990314-1-maz@kernel.org>
If NV1 isn't supported on a system, make sure we always evaluate
the guest's HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1, irrespective of what the guest
may have written there.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 12 +++++++++++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 78a550537b67..7b10a44189d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -213,7 +213,8 @@ static inline bool vcpu_is_el2(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static inline bool __vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
{
- return ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, HCR_EL2) & HCR_E2H;
+ return (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HCR_NV1_RES0) ||
+ (ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, HCR_EL2) & HCR_E2H));
}
static inline bool vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index ff2e66f0bda1..9e1e3da2ed4a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2022,6 +2022,16 @@ static bool access_spsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return true;
}
+static u64 reset_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ u64 val = r->val;
+
+ if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HCR_NV1_RES0))
+ val |= HCR_E2H;
+
+ return __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
+}
+
/*
* Architected system registers.
* Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2
@@ -2513,7 +2523,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
EL2_REG(VMPIDR_EL2, access_rw, reset_unknown, 0),
EL2_REG(SCTLR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, SCTLR_EL2_RES1),
EL2_REG(ACTLR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
- EL2_REG(HCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
+ EL2_REG(HCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_hcr, 0),
EL2_REG(MDCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(CPTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, CPTR_NVHE_EL2_RES1),
EL2_REG(HSTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-27 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 11:45 [PATCH v3 00/13] arm64: Add support for FEAT_E2H0, or lack thereof Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] arm64: Add macro to compose a sysreg field value Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] arm64: cpufeatures: Correctly handle signed values Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-11 12:24 ` Will Deacon
2023-12-11 12:24 ` Will Deacon
2024-01-08 17:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-08 17:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-09 11:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-09 11:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-30 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2024-01-30 11:34 ` Will Deacon
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] arm64: cpufeature: Correctly display signed override values Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] arm64: sysreg: Add layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] arm64: cpufeature: Add ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 handling Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] arm64: cpufeature: Detect E2H0 not being implemented Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-11 12:42 ` Will Deacon
2023-12-11 12:42 ` Will Deacon
2024-01-09 15:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-09 15:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] arm64: cpufeature: Detect HCR_EL2.NV1 being RES0 Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] arm64: Add override for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] arm64: Add MIDR-based override infrastructure Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] arm64: Add MIDR-based overrides for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] KVM: arm64: Expose ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 to guests Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-11-27 11:45 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: arm64: Force guest's HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 when NV1 is not implemented Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231127114559.990314-14-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.