All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com,
	quic_sibis@quicinc.com, quic_nkela@quicinc.com,
	souvik.chakravarty@arm.com,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Clock .is_notify_supported callback
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:58:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402131047.2NVZWHma-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240212123233.1230090-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

Hi Cristian,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.8-rc4 next-20240212]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Cristian-Marussi/firmware-arm_scmi-Check-for-notification-support/20240212-203727
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212123233.1230090-7-cristian.marussi%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Clock .is_notify_supported callback
config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240213/202402131047.2NVZWHma-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c08b90c50bcac9f3f563c79491c8dbcbe7c3b574)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240213/202402131047.2NVZWHma-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402131047.2NVZWHma-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:853:8: error: call to undeclared function 'scmi_clock_domain_lookup'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     853 |         clk = scmi_clock_domain_lookup(ci, src_id);
         |               ^
>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:853:6: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct scmi_clock_info *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
     853 |         clk = scmi_clock_domain_lookup(ci, src_id);
         |             ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   2 errors generated.


vim +/scmi_clock_domain_lookup +853 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c

   842	
   843	static bool scmi_clk_notify_supported(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
   844					      u8 evt_id, u32 src_id)
   845	{
   846		bool supported;
   847		struct scmi_clock_info *clk;
   848		struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
   849	
   850		if (evt_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(evt_2_cmd))
   851			return false;
   852	
 > 853		clk = scmi_clock_domain_lookup(ci, src_id);
   854		if (IS_ERR(clk))
   855			return false;
   856	
   857		if (evt_id == SCMI_EVENT_CLOCK_RATE_CHANGED)
   858			supported = clk->rate_changed_notifications;
   859		else
   860			supported = clk->rate_change_requested_notifications;
   861	
   862		return supported;
   863	}
   864	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com,
	quic_sibis@quicinc.com, quic_nkela@quicinc.com,
	souvik.chakravarty@arm.com,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Clock .is_notify_supported callback
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:58:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402131047.2NVZWHma-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240212123233.1230090-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com>

Hi Cristian,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.8-rc4 next-20240212]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Cristian-Marussi/firmware-arm_scmi-Check-for-notification-support/20240212-203727
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212123233.1230090-7-cristian.marussi%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Clock .is_notify_supported callback
config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240213/202402131047.2NVZWHma-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c08b90c50bcac9f3f563c79491c8dbcbe7c3b574)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240213/202402131047.2NVZWHma-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402131047.2NVZWHma-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:853:8: error: call to undeclared function 'scmi_clock_domain_lookup'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     853 |         clk = scmi_clock_domain_lookup(ci, src_id);
         |               ^
>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:853:6: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct scmi_clock_info *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
     853 |         clk = scmi_clock_domain_lookup(ci, src_id);
         |             ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   2 errors generated.


vim +/scmi_clock_domain_lookup +853 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c

   842	
   843	static bool scmi_clk_notify_supported(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
   844					      u8 evt_id, u32 src_id)
   845	{
   846		bool supported;
   847		struct scmi_clock_info *clk;
   848		struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
   849	
   850		if (evt_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(evt_2_cmd))
   851			return false;
   852	
 > 853		clk = scmi_clock_domain_lookup(ci, src_id);
   854		if (IS_ERR(clk))
   855			return false;
   856	
   857		if (evt_id == SCMI_EVENT_CLOCK_RATE_CHANGED)
   858			supported = clk->rate_changed_notifications;
   859		else
   860			supported = clk->rate_change_requested_notifications;
   861	
   862		return supported;
   863	}
   864	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-13  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-12 12:32 [PATCH 00/11] Add SCMI core checks for notification support Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Check " Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add a common helper to check if a message is supported Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 03/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Perf .is_notify_supported callback Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 04/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Power " Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 05/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement SysPower " Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Clock " Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 23:00   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-12 23:00     ` kernel test robot
2024-02-12 23:20   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-12 23:20     ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13  2:58   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-02-13  2:58     ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13  8:49     ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-13  8:49       ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-13 18:24       ` Nikunj Kela
2024-02-13 18:24         ` Nikunj Kela
2024-02-14 18:21         ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-14 18:21           ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 07/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Sensor " Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 08/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Reset " Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 09/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Powercap " Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 10/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Use opps_by_lvl to store opps Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 11/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Report frequencies in Perf notifications Cristian Marussi
2024-02-12 12:32   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-22  9:09 ` [PATCH 00/11] Add SCMI core checks for notification support Sudeep Holla
2024-02-22  9:09   ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202402131047.2NVZWHma-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=quic_nkela@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
    --cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.