From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: rtc: armada-380-rtc: convert to dtschema
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:02:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325160231.GB4035876-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e68e0ca-2f3e-41a7-bb96-00fbdadc4436@gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 01:02:31AM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> On 3/24/24 00:37, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 23/03/2024 23:46:13+0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> >> Convert existing binding to dtschema to support validation.
> >>
> >> +required:
> >> + - compatible
> >> + - reg
> >> + - reg-names
> >> + - interrupts
> >> +
> >> +additionalProperties: false
> >
> > This is not correct because at least start-year is supported. Please
> > check for all your other submissions too.
> >
>
> allOf:
> - $ref: rtc.yaml#
>
> is missing, and then
>
> unvealuatedProperties: false
>
> to account for that.
>
> "start-year" is read in the RTC base class, so I wonder why so many RTC
> bindings add a reference to rtc.yaml, but then use
>
> additionalProperties: false
They may have pre-dated support for 'unevaluatedProperties', or you can
list out which properties are used from a referenced schema which
disallows unlisted properties. There's no hard rule here. Either way is
fine.
Other than this and my 1 other comment, this series looks fine to me.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: rtc: armada-380-rtc: convert to dtschema
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:02:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325160231.GB4035876-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e68e0ca-2f3e-41a7-bb96-00fbdadc4436@gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 01:02:31AM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> On 3/24/24 00:37, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 23/03/2024 23:46:13+0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> >> Convert existing binding to dtschema to support validation.
> >>
> >> +required:
> >> + - compatible
> >> + - reg
> >> + - reg-names
> >> + - interrupts
> >> +
> >> +additionalProperties: false
> >
> > This is not correct because at least start-year is supported. Please
> > check for all your other submissions too.
> >
>
> allOf:
> - $ref: rtc.yaml#
>
> is missing, and then
>
> unvealuatedProperties: false
>
> to account for that.
>
> "start-year" is read in the RTC base class, so I wonder why so many RTC
> bindings add a reference to rtc.yaml, but then use
>
> additionalProperties: false
They may have pre-dated support for 'unevaluatedProperties', or you can
list out which properties are used from a referenced schema which
disallows unlisted properties. There's no hard rule here. Either way is
fine.
Other than this and my 1 other comment, this series looks fine to me.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-25 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-23 22:46 [PATCH 0/4] dt-bindings: rtc: convert multiple devices to dtschema Javier Carrasco
2024-03-23 22:46 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-03-23 22:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: rtc: armada-380-rtc: convert " Javier Carrasco
2024-03-23 22:46 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-03-23 23:37 ` Alexandre Belloni
2024-03-23 23:37 ` Alexandre Belloni
2024-03-24 0:02 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-03-24 0:02 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-03-25 16:02 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2024-03-25 16:02 ` Rob Herring
2024-03-23 22:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: rtc: alphascale,asm9260: " Javier Carrasco
2024-03-23 22:46 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-03-23 22:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: rtc: digicolor-rtc: " Javier Carrasco
2024-03-23 22:46 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-03-25 16:01 ` Rob Herring
2024-03-25 16:01 ` Rob Herring
2024-03-25 19:46 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-03-25 19:46 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-03-25 20:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-03-25 20:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-03-23 22:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: rtc: nxp,lpc1788-rtc: " Javier Carrasco
2024-03-23 22:46 ` Javier Carrasco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240325160231.GB4035876-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.