Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] arch/mm/fault: accelerate pagefault when badaccess

[Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>]

On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 03:49:53PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> On 2024/4/4 4:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 16:37:58 +0800 Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > After VMA lock-based page fault handling enabled, if bad access met
> > > under per-vma lock, it will fallback to mmap_lock-based handling,
> > > so it leads to unnessary mmap lock and vma find again. A test from
> > > lmbench shows 34% improve after this changes on arm64,
> > > 
> > >    lat_sig -P 1 prot lat_sig 0.29194 -> 0.19198
> > > 
> > > Only build test on other archs except arm64.
> > 
> > Thanks.  So we now want a bunch of architectures to runtime test this.  Do
> > we have a selftest in place which will adequately do this?
> 
> I don't find such selftest, and badaccess would lead to coredump, the
> performance should not affect most scene, so no selftest is acceptable.
> lmbench is easy to use to measure the performance.

The rationale for this series (performance improvement) is a bit odd,
since I would expect that the changed code is usually never executed.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv