From: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Evan Green" <evan@rivosinc.com>,
"Charlie Jenkins" <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
"Jesse Taube" <jesse@rivosinc.com>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
"Xiao Wang" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
"Andy Chiu" <andy.chiu@sifive.com>,
"Costa Shulyupin" <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
"Ben Dooks" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Erick Archer" <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v0] RISCV: Report vector unaligned accesses hwprobe
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:24:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240604162457.3757417-1-jesse@rivosinc.com> (raw)
Detected if a system traps into the kernel on an vector unaligned access.
Add the result to a new key in hwprobe.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 3 ++
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +-
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 6 +++
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 34 ++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 4 ++
6 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 347805446151..5ad69cf25b25 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -35,9 +35,12 @@ void riscv_user_isa_enable(void);
#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED)
bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void);
+bool check_vector_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void);
+
void unaligned_emulation_finish(void);
bool unaligned_ctl_available(void);
DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, vector_misaligned_access);
#else
static inline bool unaligned_ctl_available(void)
{
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
index 630507dff5ea..150a9877b0af 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
#include <uapi/asm/hwprobe.h>
-#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 6
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 7
static inline bool riscv_hwprobe_key_is_valid(__s64 key)
{
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
index 060212331a03..4474e98d17bd 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -68,6 +68,12 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe {
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED (4 << 0)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_MASK (7 << 0)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE 6
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_KEY_MISALIGNED_PERF 7
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN 0
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_EMULATED 1
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_SLOW 2
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_FAST 3
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED 4
/* Increase RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY when adding items. */
/* Flags */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
index b286b73e763e..ce641cc6e47a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
@@ -184,6 +184,36 @@ static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
}
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
+static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ u64 perf = -1ULL;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
+ int this_perf = per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu);
+
+ if (perf == -1ULL)
+ perf = this_perf;
+
+ if (perf != this_perf) {
+ perf = RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (perf == -1ULL)
+ return RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
+
+ return perf;
+}
+#else
+static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
+{
+ return RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
+}
+#endif
+
static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
const struct cpumask *cpus)
{
@@ -211,6 +241,10 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
pair->value = hwprobe_misaligned(cpus);
break;
+ case RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_KEY_MISALIGNED_PERF:
+ pair->value = hwprobe_vec_misaligned(cpus);
+ break;
+
case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE:
pair->value = 0;
if (hwprobe_ext0_has(cpus, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ))
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
index 2adb7c3e4dd5..0c07e990e9c5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <asm/entry-common.h>
#include <asm/hwprobe.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/vector.h>
#define INSN_MATCH_LB 0x3
#define INSN_MASK_LB 0x707f
@@ -426,6 +427,14 @@ int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (get_insn(regs, epc, &insn))
return -1;
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+ if (*this_cpu_ptr(&vector_misaligned_access) == RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN) {
+ *this_cpu_ptr(&vector_misaligned_access) = RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED;
+ regs->epc = epc + INSN_LEN(insn);
+ return 0;
+ }
+#endif
+
regs->epc = 0;
if ((insn & INSN_MASK_LW) == INSN_MATCH_LW) {
@@ -625,6 +634,57 @@ static bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu)
return misaligned_emu_detected;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V
+static bool check_vector_unaligned_access(int cpu)
+{
+ long *mas_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&vector_misaligned_access, cpu);
+ struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu];
+ unsigned long tmp_var;
+ bool misaligned_vec_suported;
+
+ if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, v))
+ return false;
+
+ /* This case will only happen if a unaligned vector load
+ * was called by the kernel before this check
+ */
+ if (*mas_ptr != RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN)
+ return false;
+
+ kernel_vector_begin();
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ ".option push\n\t"
+ ".option arch, +v\n\t"
+ " li t1, 0x1\n" //size
+ " vsetvli t0, t1, e16, m2, ta, ma\n\t" // Vectors of 16b
+ " addi t0, %[ptr], 1\n\t" // Misalign address
+ " vle16.v v0, (t0)\n\t" // Load bytes
+ ".option pop\n\t"
+ : : [ptr] "r" (&tmp_var) : "v0", "t0", "t1", "memory");
+ kernel_vector_end();
+
+ misaligned_vec_suported = (*mas_ptr == RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN);
+
+ return misaligned_vec_suported;
+}
+#else
+static bool check_vector_unaligned_access(int cpu)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+#endif
+
+bool check_vector_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ if (!check_vector_unaligned_access(cpu))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
{
int cpu;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
index a9a6bcb02acf..92a84239beaa 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#define MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE ((MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2) - 0x80)
DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, vector_misaligned_access) = RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
static cpumask_t fast_misaligned_access;
@@ -264,6 +265,8 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
{
bool all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus();
+ check_vector_unaligned_access_all_cpus();
+
if (!all_cpus_emulated)
return check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus();
@@ -273,6 +276,7 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
{
check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus();
+ check_vector_unaligned_access_all_cpus();
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Evan Green" <evan@rivosinc.com>,
"Charlie Jenkins" <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
"Jesse Taube" <jesse@rivosinc.com>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
"Xiao Wang" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
"Andy Chiu" <andy.chiu@sifive.com>,
"Costa Shulyupin" <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
"Ben Dooks" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Erick Archer" <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v0] RISCV: Report vector unaligned accesses hwprobe
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:24:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240604162457.3757417-1-jesse@rivosinc.com> (raw)
Detected if a system traps into the kernel on an vector unaligned access.
Add the result to a new key in hwprobe.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 3 ++
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +-
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 6 +++
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 34 ++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 4 ++
6 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 347805446151..5ad69cf25b25 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -35,9 +35,12 @@ void riscv_user_isa_enable(void);
#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED)
bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void);
+bool check_vector_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void);
+
void unaligned_emulation_finish(void);
bool unaligned_ctl_available(void);
DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, vector_misaligned_access);
#else
static inline bool unaligned_ctl_available(void)
{
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
index 630507dff5ea..150a9877b0af 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
#include <uapi/asm/hwprobe.h>
-#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 6
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY 7
static inline bool riscv_hwprobe_key_is_valid(__s64 key)
{
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
index 060212331a03..4474e98d17bd 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h
@@ -68,6 +68,12 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe {
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED (4 << 0)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_MASK (7 << 0)
#define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE 6
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_KEY_MISALIGNED_PERF 7
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN 0
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_EMULATED 1
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_SLOW 2
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_FAST 3
+#define RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED 4
/* Increase RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY when adding items. */
/* Flags */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
index b286b73e763e..ce641cc6e47a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
@@ -184,6 +184,36 @@ static u64 hwprobe_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
}
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
+static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ u64 perf = -1ULL;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
+ int this_perf = per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu);
+
+ if (perf == -1ULL)
+ perf = this_perf;
+
+ if (perf != this_perf) {
+ perf = RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (perf == -1ULL)
+ return RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
+
+ return perf;
+}
+#else
+static u64 hwprobe_vec_misaligned(const struct cpumask *cpus)
+{
+ return RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
+}
+#endif
+
static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
const struct cpumask *cpus)
{
@@ -211,6 +241,10 @@ static void hwprobe_one_pair(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair,
pair->value = hwprobe_misaligned(cpus);
break;
+ case RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_KEY_MISALIGNED_PERF:
+ pair->value = hwprobe_vec_misaligned(cpus);
+ break;
+
case RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE:
pair->value = 0;
if (hwprobe_ext0_has(cpus, RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ))
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
index 2adb7c3e4dd5..0c07e990e9c5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <asm/entry-common.h>
#include <asm/hwprobe.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/vector.h>
#define INSN_MATCH_LB 0x3
#define INSN_MASK_LB 0x707f
@@ -426,6 +427,14 @@ int handle_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (get_insn(regs, epc, &insn))
return -1;
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+ if (*this_cpu_ptr(&vector_misaligned_access) == RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN) {
+ *this_cpu_ptr(&vector_misaligned_access) = RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED;
+ regs->epc = epc + INSN_LEN(insn);
+ return 0;
+ }
+#endif
+
regs->epc = 0;
if ((insn & INSN_MASK_LW) == INSN_MATCH_LW) {
@@ -625,6 +634,57 @@ static bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu)
return misaligned_emu_detected;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V
+static bool check_vector_unaligned_access(int cpu)
+{
+ long *mas_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&vector_misaligned_access, cpu);
+ struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu];
+ unsigned long tmp_var;
+ bool misaligned_vec_suported;
+
+ if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(isainfo->isa, v))
+ return false;
+
+ /* This case will only happen if a unaligned vector load
+ * was called by the kernel before this check
+ */
+ if (*mas_ptr != RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN)
+ return false;
+
+ kernel_vector_begin();
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ ".option push\n\t"
+ ".option arch, +v\n\t"
+ " li t1, 0x1\n" //size
+ " vsetvli t0, t1, e16, m2, ta, ma\n\t" // Vectors of 16b
+ " addi t0, %[ptr], 1\n\t" // Misalign address
+ " vle16.v v0, (t0)\n\t" // Load bytes
+ ".option pop\n\t"
+ : : [ptr] "r" (&tmp_var) : "v0", "t0", "t1", "memory");
+ kernel_vector_end();
+
+ misaligned_vec_suported = (*mas_ptr == RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN);
+
+ return misaligned_vec_suported;
+}
+#else
+static bool check_vector_unaligned_access(int cpu)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+#endif
+
+bool check_vector_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ if (!check_vector_unaligned_access(cpu))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
{
int cpu;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
index a9a6bcb02acf..92a84239beaa 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#define MISALIGNED_COPY_SIZE ((MISALIGNED_BUFFER_SIZE / 2) - 0x80)
DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(long, vector_misaligned_access) = RISCV_HWPROBE_VEC_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
static cpumask_t fast_misaligned_access;
@@ -264,6 +265,8 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
{
bool all_cpus_emulated = check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus();
+ check_vector_unaligned_access_all_cpus();
+
if (!all_cpus_emulated)
return check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus();
@@ -273,6 +276,7 @@ static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
static int check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
{
check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus();
+ check_vector_unaligned_access_all_cpus();
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-04 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-04 16:24 Jesse Taube [this message]
2024-06-04 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v0] RISCV: Report vector unaligned accesses hwprobe Jesse Taube
2024-06-04 16:42 ` Jesse Taube
2024-06-04 16:42 ` Jesse Taube
2024-06-05 7:55 ` Clément Léger
2024-06-05 7:55 ` Clément Léger
2024-06-05 15:45 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-05 15:45 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-05 15:54 ` Evan Green
2024-06-05 15:54 ` Evan Green
2024-06-05 16:19 ` Jesse Taube
2024-06-05 16:19 ` Jesse Taube
2024-06-05 16:23 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-05 16:23 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-05 16:34 ` Conor Dooley
2024-06-05 16:34 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240604162457.3757417-1-jesse@rivosinc.com \
--to=jesse@rivosinc.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=andy.chiu@sifive.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=costa.shul@redhat.com \
--cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
--cc=evan@rivosinc.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.