All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit.recursion per task.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:18:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612131829.2e33ca71@rorschach.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612170303.3896084-9-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:44:34 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:

> Softirq is preemptible on PREEMPT_RT. Without a per-CPU lock in
> local_bh_disable() there is no guarantee that only one device is
> transmitting at a time.
> With preemption and multiple senders it is possible that the per-CPU
> recursion counter gets incremented by different threads and exceeds
> XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT leading to a false positive recursion alert.
> 
> Instead of adding a lock to protect the per-CPU variable it is simpler
> to make the counter per-task. Sending and receiving skbs happens always
> in thread context anyway.
> 
> Having a lock to protected the per-CPU counter would block/ serialize two
> sending threads needlessly. It would also require a recursive lock to
> ensure that the owner can increment the counter further.
> 
> Make the recursion counter a task_struct member on PREEMPT_RT.

I'm curious to what would be the harm to using a per_task counter
instead of per_cpu outside of PREEMPT_RT. That way, we wouldn't have to
have the #ifdef.

-- Steve


> 
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/netdevice.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  include/linux/sched.h     |  4 +++-
>  net/core/dev.h            | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index d20c6c99eb887..b5ec072ec2430 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -3223,7 +3223,9 @@ struct softnet_data {
>  #endif
>  	/* written and read only by owning cpu: */
>  	struct {
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
>  		u16 recursion;
> +#endif
>  		u8  more;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_EGRESS
>  		u8  skip_txqueue;
> @@ -3256,10 +3258,19 @@ struct softnet_data {
>  
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct softnet_data, softnet_data);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +static inline int dev_recursion_level(void)
> +{
> +	return current->net_xmit_recursion;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
>  static inline int dev_recursion_level(void)
>  {
>  	return this_cpu_read(softnet_data.xmit.recursion);
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  void __netif_schedule(struct Qdisc *q);
>  void netif_schedule_queue(struct netdev_queue *txq);
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 61591ac6eab6d..a9b0ca72db55f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -975,7 +975,9 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	/* delay due to memory thrashing */
>  	unsigned                        in_thrashing:1;
>  #endif
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +	u8				net_xmit_recursion;
> +#endif
>  	unsigned long			atomic_flags; /* Flags requiring atomic access. */
>  
>  	struct restart_block		restart_block;
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h
> index b7b518bc2be55..2f96d63053ad0 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.h
> +++ b/net/core/dev.h
> @@ -150,6 +150,25 @@ struct napi_struct *napi_by_id(unsigned int napi_id);
>  void kick_defer_list_purge(struct softnet_data *sd, unsigned int cpu);
>  
>  #define XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT	8
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +static inline bool dev_xmit_recursion(void)
> +{
> +	return unlikely(current->net_xmit_recursion > XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dev_xmit_recursion_inc(void)
> +{
> +	current->net_xmit_recursion++;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dev_xmit_recursion_dec(void)
> +{
> +	current->net_xmit_recursion--;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
>  static inline bool dev_xmit_recursion(void)
>  {
>  	return unlikely(__this_cpu_read(softnet_data.xmit.recursion) >
> @@ -165,5 +184,6 @@ static inline void dev_xmit_recursion_dec(void)
>  {
>  	__this_cpu_dec(softnet_data.xmit.recursion);
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  #endif


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-12 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-12 16:44 [PATCH v6 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 01/15] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 02/15] locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 03/15] net: Use __napi_alloc_frag_align() instead of open coding it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 04/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 05/15] net/tcp_sigpool: Use nested-BH locking for sigpool_scratch Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 06/15] net/ipv4: Use nested-BH locking for ipv4_tcp_sk Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 07/15] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit.recursion per task Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 17:18   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-06-14  8:27     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14  8:38       ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-14  9:48         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 14:08           ` Paolo Abeni
2024-06-14 16:04             ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 16:04             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 16:01           ` [PATCH v6.5 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 09/15] dev: Remove PREEMPT_RT ifdefs from backlog_lock.*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 10/15] dev: Use nested-BH locking for softnet_data.process_queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13  9:32   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13  9:33   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240612131829.2e33ca71@rorschach.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.