From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v6 net-next 02/15] locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:44:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612170303.3896084-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612170303.3896084-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Add local_lock_nested_bh() locking. It is based on local_lock_t and the
naming follows the preempt_disable_nested() example.
For !PREEMPT_RT + !LOCKDEP it is a per-CPU annotation for locking
assumptions based on local_bh_disable(). The macro is optimized away
during compilation.
For !PREEMPT_RT + LOCKDEP the local_lock_nested_bh() is reduced to
the usual lock-acquire plus lockdep_assert_in_softirq() - ensuring that
BH is disabled.
For PREEMPT_RT local_lock_nested_bh() acquires the specified per-CPU
lock. It does not disable CPU migration because it relies on
local_bh_disable() disabling CPU migration.
With LOCKDEP it performans the usual lockdep checks as with !PREEMPT_RT.
Due to include hell the softirq check has been moved spinlock.c.
The intention is to use this locking in places where locking of a per-CPU
variable relies on BH being disabled. Instead of treating disabled
bottom halves as a big per-CPU lock, PREEMPT_RT can use this to reduce
the locking scope to what actually needs protecting.
A side effect is that it also documents the protection scope of the
per-CPU variables.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/local_lock.h | 10 ++++++++++
include/linux/local_lock_internal.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/lockdep.h | 3 +++
kernel/locking/spinlock.c | 8 ++++++++
4 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock.h b/include/linux/local_lock.h
index 82366a37f4474..091dc0b6bdfb9 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
@@ -62,4 +62,14 @@ DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irqsave, local_lock_t __percpu,
local_unlock_irqrestore(_T->lock, _T->flags),
unsigned long flags)
+#define local_lock_nested_bh(_lock) \
+ __local_lock_nested_bh(_lock)
+
+#define local_unlock_nested_bh(_lock) \
+ __local_unlock_nested_bh(_lock)
+
+DEFINE_GUARD(local_lock_nested_bh, local_lock_t __percpu*,
+ local_lock_nested_bh(_T),
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(_T))
+
#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
index 975e33b793a77..8dd71fbbb6d2b 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
@@ -62,6 +62,17 @@ do { \
local_lock_debug_init(lock); \
} while (0)
+#define __spinlock_nested_bh_init(lock) \
+do { \
+ static struct lock_class_key __key; \
+ \
+ debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));\
+ lockdep_init_map_type(&(lock)->dep_map, #lock, &__key, \
+ 0, LD_WAIT_CONFIG, LD_WAIT_INV, \
+ LD_LOCK_NORMAL); \
+ local_lock_debug_init(lock); \
+} while (0)
+
#define __local_lock(lock) \
do { \
preempt_disable(); \
@@ -98,6 +109,15 @@ do { \
local_irq_restore(flags); \
} while (0)
+#define __local_lock_nested_bh(lock) \
+ do { \
+ lockdep_assert_in_softirq(); \
+ local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define __local_unlock_nested_bh(lock) \
+ local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock))
+
#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
/*
@@ -138,4 +158,15 @@ typedef spinlock_t local_lock_t;
#define __local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) __local_unlock(lock)
+#define __local_lock_nested_bh(lock) \
+do { \
+ lockdep_assert_in_softirq_func(); \
+ spin_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define __local_unlock_nested_bh(lock) \
+do { \
+ spin_unlock(this_cpu_ptr((lock))); \
+} while (0)
+
#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 5e51b0de4c4b5..fcc02812bf31e 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -605,6 +605,8 @@ do { \
(!in_softirq() || in_irq() || in_nmi())); \
} while (0)
+extern void lockdep_assert_in_softirq_func(void);
+
#else
# define might_lock(lock) do { } while (0)
# define might_lock_read(lock) do { } while (0)
@@ -618,6 +620,7 @@ do { \
# define lockdep_assert_preemption_enabled() do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled() do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_assert_in_softirq() do { } while (0)
+# define lockdep_assert_in_softirq_func() do { } while (0)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
index 8475a0794f8c5..438c6086d540e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
@@ -413,3 +413,11 @@ notrace int in_lock_functions(unsigned long addr)
&& addr < (unsigned long)__lock_text_end;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(in_lock_functions);
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
+void notrace lockdep_assert_in_softirq_func(void)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_in_softirq();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_assert_in_softirq_func);
+#endif
--
2.45.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-12 16:44 [PATCH v6 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 01/15] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 03/15] net: Use __napi_alloc_frag_align() instead of open coding it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 04/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 05/15] net/tcp_sigpool: Use nested-BH locking for sigpool_scratch Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 06/15] net/ipv4: Use nested-BH locking for ipv4_tcp_sk Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 07/15] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit.recursion per task Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 17:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 8:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 8:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-14 9:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 14:08 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-06-14 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 16:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 16:01 ` [PATCH v6.5 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 09/15] dev: Remove PREEMPT_RT ifdefs from backlog_lock.*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 10/15] dev: Use nested-BH locking for softnet_data.process_queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13 9:32 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13 9:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240612170303.3896084-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.