From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 net-next 06/15] net/ipv4: Use nested-BH locking for ipv4_tcp_sk.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:44:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612170303.3896084-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612170303.3896084-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
ipv4_tcp_sk is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH for its
locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on PREEMPT_RT
this data structure requires explicit locking.
Make a struct with a sock member (original ipv4_tcp_sk) and a
local_lock_t and use local_lock_nested_bh() for locking. This change
adds only lockdep coverage and does not alter the functional behaviour
for !PREEMPT_RT.
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
include/net/sock.h | 5 +++++
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 15 +++++++++++----
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index b30ea0c342a65..cce23ac4d5148 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -544,6 +544,11 @@ struct sock {
netns_tracker ns_tracker;
};
+struct sock_bh_locked {
+ struct sock *sock;
+ local_lock_t bh_lock;
+};
+
enum sk_pacing {
SK_PACING_NONE = 0,
SK_PACING_NEEDED = 1,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 3613e08ca7949..58b21f5c333b2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -93,7 +93,9 @@ static int tcp_v4_md5_hash_hdr(char *md5_hash, const struct tcp_md5sig_key *key,
struct inet_hashinfo tcp_hashinfo;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_hashinfo);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sock *, ipv4_tcp_sk);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sock_bh_locked, ipv4_tcp_sk) = {
+ .bh_lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(bh_lock),
+};
static u32 tcp_v4_init_seq(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -882,7 +884,9 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
arg.tos = ip_hdr(skb)->tos;
arg.uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk && sk_fullsock(sk) ? sk : NULL);
local_bh_disable();
- ctl_sk = this_cpu_read(ipv4_tcp_sk);
+ local_lock_nested_bh(&ipv4_tcp_sk.bh_lock);
+ ctl_sk = this_cpu_read(ipv4_tcp_sk.sock);
+
sock_net_set(ctl_sk, net);
if (sk) {
ctl_sk->sk_mark = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ?
@@ -907,6 +911,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
sock_net_set(ctl_sk, &init_net);
__TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_OUTSEGS);
__TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_OUTRSTS);
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&ipv4_tcp_sk.bh_lock);
local_bh_enable();
#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
@@ -1002,7 +1007,8 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_ack(const struct sock *sk,
arg.tos = tos;
arg.uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk_fullsock(sk) ? sk : NULL);
local_bh_disable();
- ctl_sk = this_cpu_read(ipv4_tcp_sk);
+ local_lock_nested_bh(&ipv4_tcp_sk.bh_lock);
+ ctl_sk = this_cpu_read(ipv4_tcp_sk.sock);
sock_net_set(ctl_sk, net);
ctl_sk->sk_mark = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ?
inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark : READ_ONCE(sk->sk_mark);
@@ -1017,6 +1023,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_ack(const struct sock *sk,
sock_net_set(ctl_sk, &init_net);
__TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_OUTSEGS);
+ local_unlock_nested_bh(&ipv4_tcp_sk.bh_lock);
local_bh_enable();
}
@@ -3619,7 +3626,7 @@ void __init tcp_v4_init(void)
sk->sk_clockid = CLOCK_MONOTONIC;
- per_cpu(ipv4_tcp_sk, cpu) = sk;
+ per_cpu(ipv4_tcp_sk.sock, cpu) = sk;
}
if (register_pernet_subsys(&tcp_sk_ops))
panic("Failed to create the TCP control socket.\n");
--
2.45.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-12 16:44 [PATCH v6 net-next 00/15] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 01/15] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 02/15] locking/local_lock: Add local nested BH locking infrastructure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 03/15] net: Use __napi_alloc_frag_align() instead of open coding it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 04/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for napi_alloc_cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 05/15] net/tcp_sigpool: Use nested-BH locking for sigpool_scratch Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 07/15] netfilter: br_netfilter: Use nested-BH locking for brnf_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit.recursion per task Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 17:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 8:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 8:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-14 9:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 14:08 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-06-14 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-14 16:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-14 16:01 ` [PATCH v6.5 08/15] net: softnet_data: Make xmit " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 09/15] dev: Remove PREEMPT_RT ifdefs from backlog_lock.*() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 10/15] dev: Use nested-BH locking for softnet_data.process_queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 12/15] seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 13/15] net: Use nested-BH locking for bpf_scratchpad Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 14/15] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13 9:32 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2024-06-12 16:44 ` [PATCH v6 net-next 15/15] net: Move per-CPU flush-lists to bpf_net_context " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-06-13 9:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240612170303.3896084-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.