Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] hw/acpi: Generic Port Affinity Structure support

[Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>]

On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:52:19 +0200
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:03:16 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> > These are very similar to the recently added Generic Initiators
> > but instead of representing an initiator of memory traffic they
> > represent an edge point beyond which may lie either targets or
> > initiators.  Here we add these ports such that they may
> > be targets of hmat_lb records to describe the latency and
> > bandwidth from host side initiators to the port.  A discoverable
> > mechanism such as UEFI CDAT read from CXL devices and switches
> > is used to discover the remainder of the path, and the OS can build
> > up full latency and bandwidth numbers as need for work and data
> > placement decisions.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > v3: Move to hw/acpi/pci.c
> >     Rename the funciton to actually registers both types
> >     of generic nodes to reflect it isn't GI only.
> >     Note that the qom part is unchanged and other changes are mostly
> >     code movement so I've kept Markus' Ack.
> > ---
> >  qapi/qom.json                            |  34 ++++
> >  include/hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.h |  35 ++++
> >  include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h              |   4 +
> >  include/hw/acpi/pci.h                    |   3 +-
> >  include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h              |   1 +
> >  hw/acpi/acpi_generic_initiator.c         | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  hw/acpi/aml-build.c                      |  40 +++++
> >  hw/acpi/pci.c                            | 110 +++++++++++-
> >  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c                 |   2 +-
> >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c                     |   2 +-
> >  hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c      |   1 -
> >  11 files changed, 443 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)  
> 
> this is quite large patch, is it possible to split into
> a set of smaller patches?

Oops.

It's bigger that it should due to a messed up rebase.
The acpi_generic_initator.c/.h shouldn't exist!

With those gone will be much more manageable.