Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iio: adc: sophgo-saradc: Add driver for Sophgo CV18XX series SARADC

From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Chen Wang" <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>,
	"Inochi Amaoto" <inochiama@outlook.com>,
	"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	"Miquèl Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iio: adc: sophgo-saradc: Add driver for Sophgo CV18XX series SARADC
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 14:05:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240817140526.579cd9cc@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812-sg2002-adc-v4-2-599bdb67592f@bootlin.com>

On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 17:00:56 +0200
Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@bootlin.com> wrote:

> This adds a driver for the common Sophgo SARADC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@bootlin.com>
Similar comment on wild cards to the one you resolved in the dt binding
applies to the driver.

So normally convention is pick a part and name after that for
all function names, parameters etc.

cv1800b seems appropriate given the binding.

Other than that, just one trivial comment from me.

Jonathan

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/sophgo-cv18xx-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/sophgo-cv18xx-adc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ab7ee0f482cc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/sophgo-cv18xx-adc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@

> +static int cv18xx_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct cv18xx_adc *saradc;
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> +	struct clk *clk;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*saradc));
> +	if (!indio_dev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	saradc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	indio_dev->name = "sophgo-cv18xx-adc";
This definitely doesn't want to be wildcard based

> +	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> +	indio_dev->info = &cv18xx_adc_info;
> +	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(sophgo_channels);
> +	indio_dev->channels = sophgo_channels;
> +
> +	clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(clk);
> +
> +	saradc->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(saradc->regs))
> +		return PTR_ERR(saradc->regs);
> +
> +	saradc->irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
> +	if (saradc->irq >= 0) {
> +		init_completion(&saradc->completion);
> +		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, saradc->irq,
> +				       cv18xx_adc_interrupt_handler, 0,
> +				       dev_name(&pdev->dev), saradc);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		writel(1, saradc->regs + CV18XX_ADC_INTR_EN_REG);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = devm_mutex_init(&pdev->dev, &saradc->lock);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);

Is this used?

> +	writel(FIELD_PREP(CV18XX_ADC_DEF_STARTUP_CYCLE_MASK, 0xF) |
> +	       FIELD_PREP(CV18XX_ADC_DEF_SAMPLE_WINDOW_MASK, 0xF) |
> +	       FIELD_PREP(CV18XX_ADC_DEF_CLOCK_DIVIDER_MASK, 0x1) |
> +	       FIELD_PREP(CV18XX_ADC_DEF_COMPARE_CYCLE_MASK, 0xF),
> +	       saradc->regs + CV18XX_ADC_CYC_SET_REG);
> +
> +	return devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev);
> +}