All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: daire.mcnamara@microchip.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
	robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, kevin.xie@starfivetech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] PCI: microchip: Fix outbound address translation tables
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 09:42:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250116154253.GA584488@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115001309.GA508227@bhelgaas>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 06:13:10PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:00:41PM +0100, daire.mcnamara@microchip.com wrote:
> > From: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
> > 
> > On Microchip PolarFire SoC (MPFS) the PCIe Root Port can be behind one of
> > three general-purpose Fabric Interface Controller (FIC) buses that
> > encapsulate an AXI-M interface. That FIC is responsible for managing
> > the translations of the upper 32-bits of the AXI-M address. On MPFS,
> > the Root Port driver needs to take account of that outbound address
> > translation done by the parent FIC bus before setting up its own
> > outbound address translation tables.  In all cases on MPFS,
> > the remaining outbound address translation tables are 32-bit only.
> > 
> > Limit the outbound address translation tables to 32-bit only.
> 
> I don't quite understand what this is saying.  It seems like the code
> keeps only the low 32 bits of a PCI address and throws away any
> address bits above the low 32.
> 
> If that's what the FIC does, I wouldn't describe the FIC as
> "translating the upper 32 bits" since it sounds like the translation
> is just truncation.
> 
> I guess it must be more complicated than that?  I assume you can still
> reach BARs that have PCI addresses above 4GB using CPU loads/stores?
> 
> The apertures through the host bridge for MMIO access are described by
> DT ranges properties, so this must be something that can't be
> described that way?

Ping?  I'd really like to understand this before the v6.14 merge
window opens on Sunday.

Bjorn

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: daire.mcnamara@microchip.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
	robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, kevin.xie@starfivetech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] PCI: microchip: Fix outbound address translation tables
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 09:42:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250116154253.GA584488@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115001309.GA508227@bhelgaas>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 06:13:10PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:00:41PM +0100, daire.mcnamara@microchip.com wrote:
> > From: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
> > 
> > On Microchip PolarFire SoC (MPFS) the PCIe Root Port can be behind one of
> > three general-purpose Fabric Interface Controller (FIC) buses that
> > encapsulate an AXI-M interface. That FIC is responsible for managing
> > the translations of the upper 32-bits of the AXI-M address. On MPFS,
> > the Root Port driver needs to take account of that outbound address
> > translation done by the parent FIC bus before setting up its own
> > outbound address translation tables.  In all cases on MPFS,
> > the remaining outbound address translation tables are 32-bit only.
> > 
> > Limit the outbound address translation tables to 32-bit only.
> 
> I don't quite understand what this is saying.  It seems like the code
> keeps only the low 32 bits of a PCI address and throws away any
> address bits above the low 32.
> 
> If that's what the FIC does, I wouldn't describe the FIC as
> "translating the upper 32 bits" since it sounds like the translation
> is just truncation.
> 
> I guess it must be more complicated than that?  I assume you can still
> reach BARs that have PCI addresses above 4GB using CPU loads/stores?
> 
> The apertures through the host bridge for MMIO access are described by
> DT ranges properties, so this must be something that can't be
> described that way?

Ping?  I'd really like to understand this before the v6.14 merge
window opens on Sunday.

Bjorn

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-11 14:00 [PATCH v10 0/3] Fix address translations on MPFS PCIe controller daire.mcnamara
2024-10-11 14:00 ` daire.mcnamara
2024-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] PCI: microchip: Fix outbound address translation tables daire.mcnamara
2024-10-11 14:00   ` daire.mcnamara
2025-01-15  0:13   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-15  0:13     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-16 15:42     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-01-16 15:42       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-16 16:46       ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-16 16:46         ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-16 17:07         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-16 17:07           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-16 17:45           ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-16 17:45             ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-16 18:02             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-16 18:02               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-17 10:53               ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-17 10:53                 ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-17 17:30                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-17 17:30                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-17 21:27                   ` Frank Li
2025-01-17 21:27                     ` Frank Li
2024-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] PCI: microchip: Fix inbound " daire.mcnamara
2024-10-11 14:00   ` daire.mcnamara
2024-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] dt-bindings: PCI: microchip,pcie-host: allow dma-noncoherent daire.mcnamara
2024-10-11 14:00   ` daire.mcnamara
2024-11-13 11:50 ` [PATCH v10 0/3] Fix address translations on MPFS PCIe controller Conor Dooley
2024-11-13 11:50   ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-14 17:16   ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-14 17:16     ` Conor Dooley
2025-01-14 23:19     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-14 23:19       ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250116154253.GA584488@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.xie@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.