From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP by RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT and ERRATA_THEAD_MAE
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:52:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250117075238.GA25422@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250116172950.1989748-1-geomatsi@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 08:29:35PM +0300, Sergey Matyukevich wrote:
> Select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP for the RISC-V extensions that allow to set
> page-based memory types in PTEs according to the requested DMA
> attributes. This is the purpose of Svpbmt or XTheadMae extensions.
> Zicbom or XTheadCmo serve a different purpose, providing instructions
> to flush/invalidate cache blocks.
Please explain what this is supposed to solve, because the above
explanation dosn't make any sense. DMA_DIRECT_REMAP is one
of the implementations supporting dma coherent allocatiosn for
non-coherent devices. So selecting it from something that
just keyes off support for an extension, but not the dma
implementation is wrong.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP by RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT and ERRATA_THEAD_MAE
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:52:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250117075238.GA25422@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250116172950.1989748-1-geomatsi@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 08:29:35PM +0300, Sergey Matyukevich wrote:
> Select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP for the RISC-V extensions that allow to set
> page-based memory types in PTEs according to the requested DMA
> attributes. This is the purpose of Svpbmt or XTheadMae extensions.
> Zicbom or XTheadCmo serve a different purpose, providing instructions
> to flush/invalidate cache blocks.
Please explain what this is supposed to solve, because the above
explanation dosn't make any sense. DMA_DIRECT_REMAP is one
of the implementations supporting dma coherent allocatiosn for
non-coherent devices. So selecting it from something that
just keyes off support for an extension, but not the dma
implementation is wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-16 17:29 [PATCH] riscv: select DMA_DIRECT_REMAP by RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT and ERRATA_THEAD_MAE Sergey Matyukevich
2025-01-16 17:29 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2025-01-17 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-17 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 8:38 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2025-01-17 8:38 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2025-01-17 9:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 9:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-17 11:01 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2025-01-17 11:01 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2025-02-17 12:23 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-17 12:23 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-20 9:48 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2025-02-20 9:48 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2025-02-26 13:58 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-26 13:58 ` Alexandre Ghiti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250117075238.GA25422@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geomatsi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.