All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
	Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/16] x86/mce/amd: Remove smca_banks_map
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:45:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250213-wip-mca-updates-v2-3-3636547fe05f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213-wip-mca-updates-v2-0-3636547fe05f@amd.com>

The MCx_MISC0[BlkPtr] field was used on legacy systems to hold a
register offset for the next MCx_MISC* register. In this way, an
implementation-specific number of registers can be discovered at
runtime.

The MCAX/SMCA register space simplifies this by always including
the MCx_MISC[1-4] registers. The MCx_MISC0[BlkPtr] field is used to
indicate (true/false) whether any MCx_MISC[1-4] registers are present.
But it does not indicate which ones nor how many. Therefore, all the
registers are accessed and their bits are checked.

AMD systems generally enforce a Read-as-Zero/Writes-Ignored policy for
unused registers. Therefore, there is no harm to read an unused
register. This is already done in practice for most of the MCx_MISC
registers.

Remove the smca_banks_map variable as it is effectively redundant.

Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
---

Notes:
    v1->v2:
    * New in v2.

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c | 30 ------------------------------
 1 file changed, 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
index 4ea691006c3b..f8ad40c5c887 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
@@ -252,9 +252,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct threshold_bank **, threshold_banks);
  */
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, bank_map);
 
-/* Map of banks that have more than MCA_MISC0 available. */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, smca_misc_banks_map);
-
 static void amd_threshold_interrupt(void);
 static void amd_deferred_error_interrupt(void);
 
@@ -264,28 +261,6 @@ static void default_deferred_error_interrupt(void)
 }
 void (*deferred_error_int_vector)(void) = default_deferred_error_interrupt;
 
-static void smca_set_misc_banks_map(unsigned int bank, unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	u32 low, high;
-
-	/*
-	 * For SMCA enabled processors, BLKPTR field of the first MISC register
-	 * (MCx_MISC0) indicates presence of additional MISC regs set (MISC1-4).
-	 */
-	if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_CONFIG(bank), &low, &high))
-		return;
-
-	if (!(low & MCI_CONFIG_MCAX))
-		return;
-
-	if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISC(bank), &low, &high))
-		return;
-
-	if (low & MASK_BLKPTR_LO)
-		per_cpu(smca_misc_banks_map, cpu) |= BIT_ULL(bank);
-
-}
-
 static void smca_configure(unsigned int bank, unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	u8 *bank_counts = this_cpu_ptr(smca_bank_counts);
@@ -326,8 +301,6 @@ static void smca_configure(unsigned int bank, unsigned int cpu)
 		wrmsr(smca_config, low, high);
 	}
 
-	smca_set_misc_banks_map(bank, cpu);
-
 	if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_IPID(bank), &low, &high)) {
 		pr_warn("Failed to read MCA_IPID for bank %d\n", bank);
 		return;
@@ -532,9 +505,6 @@ static u32 smca_get_block_address(unsigned int bank, unsigned int block,
 	if (!block)
 		return MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISC(bank);
 
-	if (!(per_cpu(smca_misc_banks_map, cpu) & BIT_ULL(bank)))
-		return 0;
-
 	return MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISCy(bank, block - 1);
 }
 

-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13 16:45 [PATCH v2 00/16] AMD MCA interrupts rework Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] x86/mce: Don't remove sysfs if thresholding sysfs init fails Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-17  6:58   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] x86/mce/amd: Remove return value for mce_threshold_create_device() Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-17  7:11   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-17 14:09     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` Yazen Ghannam [this message]
2025-02-17  7:57   ` [PATCH v2 03/16] x86/mce/amd: Remove smca_banks_map Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-17 14:17     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] x86/mce/amd: Put list_head in threshold_bank Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  1:28   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] x86/mce: Cleanup bank processing on init Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 22:32   ` Luck, Tony
2025-02-17 13:55     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18 16:40       ` Luck, Tony
2025-02-18  2:15   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] x86/mce: Remove __mcheck_cpu_init_early() Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  3:00   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 15:53     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-27 15:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-27 16:31     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-27 19:33       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-27 19:59         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-27 20:48           ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 14:29             ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] x86/mce: Define BSP-only init Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  3:16   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 15:57     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-20  1:37       ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-20 14:36         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-24 13:28           ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] x86/mce: Define BSP-only SMCA init Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  3:33   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:01     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] x86/mce: Do 'UNKNOWN' vendor check early Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  5:31   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] x86/mce: Separate global and per-CPU quirks Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  6:03   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:06     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-20  1:27       ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-20 14:37         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] x86/mce: Move machine_check_poll() status checks to helper functions Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  6:29   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] x86/mce: Unify AMD THR handler with MCA Polling Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  6:42   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:07     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] x86/mce: Unify AMD DFR " Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  7:37   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:09     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-20  1:41       ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-20 14:41         ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-24 13:31           ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] x86/mce/amd: Enable interrupt vectors once per-CPU on SMCA systems Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18  8:23   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:16     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] x86/mce/amd: Support SMCA Corrected Error Interrupt Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 22:34   ` Luck, Tony
2025-02-17 14:06     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18 13:27   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-19 16:19     ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-13 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] x86/mce: Handle AMD threshold interrupt storms Yazen Ghannam
2025-02-18 13:51   ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-02-13 22:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] AMD MCA interrupts rework Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250213-wip-mca-updates-v2-3-3636547fe05f@amd.com \
    --to=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.