All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 1/3] ice: redesign dpll sma/u.fl pins control
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:13:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220131317.GV1615191@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207180254.549314-2-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Arkadiusz Kubalewski wrote:
> DPLL-enabled E810 NIC driver provides user with list of input and output
> pins. Hardware internal design impacts user control over SMA and U.FL
> pins. Currently end-user view on those dpll pins doesn't provide any layer
> of abstraction. On the hardware level SMA and U.FL pins are tied together
> due to existence of direction control logic for each pair:
> - SMA1 (bi-directional) and U.FL1 (only output)
> - SMA2 (bi-directional) and U.FL2 (only input)
> The user activity on each pin of the pair may impact the state of the
> other.
> 
> Previously all the pins were provided to the user as is, without the
> control over SMA pins direction.
> 
> Introduce a software controlled layer of abstraction over external board
> pins, instead of providing the user with access to raw pins connected to
> the dpll:
> - new software controlled SMA and U.FL pins,
> - callback operations directing user requests to corresponding hardware
>   pins according to the runtime configuration,
> - ability to control SMA pins direction.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next 1/3] ice: redesign dpll sma/u.fl pins control
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:13:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220131317.GV1615191@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207180254.549314-2-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Arkadiusz Kubalewski wrote:
> DPLL-enabled E810 NIC driver provides user with list of input and output
> pins. Hardware internal design impacts user control over SMA and U.FL
> pins. Currently end-user view on those dpll pins doesn't provide any layer
> of abstraction. On the hardware level SMA and U.FL pins are tied together
> due to existence of direction control logic for each pair:
> - SMA1 (bi-directional) and U.FL1 (only output)
> - SMA2 (bi-directional) and U.FL2 (only input)
> The user activity on each pin of the pair may impact the state of the
> other.
> 
> Previously all the pins were provided to the user as is, without the
> control over SMA pins direction.
> 
> Introduce a software controlled layer of abstraction over external board
> pins, instead of providing the user with access to raw pins connected to
> the dpll:
> - new software controlled SMA and U.FL pins,
> - callback operations directing user requests to corresponding hardware
>   pins according to the runtime configuration,
> - ability to control SMA pins direction.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07 18:02 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 0/3] ice: decouple control of SMA/U.FL/SDP pins Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-07 18:02 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-07 18:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 1/3] ice: redesign dpll sma/u.fl pins control Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-07 18:02   ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-20 13:13   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-02-20 13:13     ` Simon Horman
2025-02-07 18:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 2/3] ice: change SMA pins to SDP in PTP API Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-07 18:02   ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-20 13:13   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2025-02-20 13:13     ` Simon Horman
2025-02-07 18:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 3/3] ice: add ice driver PTP pin documentation Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-07 18:02   ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2025-02-20 13:13   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2025-02-20 13:13     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250220131317.GV1615191@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.