From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Vinayak Holikatti <vinayak.kh@samsung.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <gost.dev@samsung.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <nifan.cxl@gmail.com>,
<dave@stgolabs.net>, <vishak.g@samsung.com>,
<krish.reddy@samsung.com>, <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
<alok.rathore@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hw/cxl: factor out calculation of sanitize duration from cmd_santize_overwrite
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:49:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305164940.00004a70@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250220052724.1256642-3-vinayak.kh@samsung.com>
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:57:23 +0530
Vinayak Holikatti <vinayak.kh@samsung.com> wrote:
> Move the code of calculation of sanitize duration into function
> for usability by other sanitize routines
>
> Estimate times based on:
> https://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DSM_Interface-V1.8.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Holikatti <vinayak.kh@samsung.com>
Hi.
Authorship of this patch is confused. Should Davidlohr
have a Co-developed-by tag? (I think those are used in qemu)
If not should the From tag be set to Davidlohr?
I'm going to post a series for potential merge without this
fixed as I'd like some more review anyway, but good to clarify
what is going on in this patch.
Jonathan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Vinayak Holikatti <vinayak.kh@samsung.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <gost.dev@samsung.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <nifan.cxl@gmail.com>,
<dave@stgolabs.net>, <vishak.g@samsung.com>,
<krish.reddy@samsung.com>, <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
<alok.rathore@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hw/cxl: factor out calculation of sanitize duration from cmd_santize_overwrite
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:49:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305164940.00004a70@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250220052724.1256642-3-vinayak.kh@samsung.com>
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:57:23 +0530
Vinayak Holikatti <vinayak.kh@samsung.com> wrote:
> Move the code of calculation of sanitize duration into function
> for usability by other sanitize routines
>
> Estimate times based on:
> https://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DSM_Interface-V1.8.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Holikatti <vinayak.kh@samsung.com>
Hi.
Authorship of this patch is confused. Should Davidlohr
have a Co-developed-by tag? (I think those are used in qemu)
If not should the From tag be set to Davidlohr?
I'm going to post a series for potential merge without this
fixed as I'd like some more review anyway, but good to clarify
what is going on in this patch.
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250220052733epcas5p41f847e5d0233a62703693565ee37374c@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2025-02-20 5:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] CXL CCI Media Operations Vinayak Holikatti
2025-02-20 5:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils: Add support for Media operations discovery commands cxl r3.2 (8.2.10.9.5.3) Vinayak Holikatti
2025-02-20 15:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-20 15:10 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-02-20 5:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] hw/cxl: factor out calculation of sanitize duration from cmd_santize_overwrite Vinayak Holikatti
2025-03-05 8:49 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-03-05 8:49 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-02-20 5:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils: Add support for Media operations Sanitize and Write Zeros commands cxl r3.2(8.2.10.9.5.3) Vinayak Holikatti
2025-02-20 15:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-20 15:10 ` Jonathan Cameron via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250305164940.00004a70@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=alok.rathore@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=krish.reddy@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vinayak.kh@samsung.com \
--cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.