All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] PCI: pcie-rockchip: add bits for Target Link Speed in LCS_2
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:07:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610200744.GA820589@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEQb5kEOCJNQJMin@geday>

On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 08:00:54AM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> Link Control and Status Register 2 is not present in current
> pcie-rockchip.h definitions. Add it in preparation for
> setting it before Gen2 retraining.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index 14954f43e5e9..7a84899d3812 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@
>  #define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S		BIT(10)
>  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
>  #define PCIE_EP_CONFIG_LCS		(PCIE_EP_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
> +#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xf0)
> +#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2_TLS_25	BIT(0)
> +#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2_TLS_50	BIT(1)

This stuff:

  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR              (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc4)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR             (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc8)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP         (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xcc)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS              (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2            (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xf0)

*Looks* like it might be duplicates of:

  #define PCI_EXP_DEVCAP          0x04    /* Device capabilities */
  #define PCI_EXP_DEVCTL          0x08    /* Device Control */
  #define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP          0x0c    /* Link Capabilities */
  #define PCI_EXP_LNKCTL          0x10    /* Link Control */
  #define PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2         0x30    /* Link Control 2 */

where the PCIe Capability is at (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc0).

If so, can you please rework these to use the existing PCI_EXP_*
definitions, including the fields inside?

>  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_L1_SUBSTATE_CTRL2 (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x90c)
>  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x274)
>  #define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP_NEXT_MASK	GENMASK(31, 20)
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] PCI: pcie-rockchip: add bits for Target Link Speed in LCS_2
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:07:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610200744.GA820589@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEQb5kEOCJNQJMin@geday>

On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 08:00:54AM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> Link Control and Status Register 2 is not present in current
> pcie-rockchip.h definitions. Add it in preparation for
> setting it before Gen2 retraining.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index 14954f43e5e9..7a84899d3812 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@
>  #define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S		BIT(10)
>  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
>  #define PCIE_EP_CONFIG_LCS		(PCIE_EP_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
> +#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xf0)
> +#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2_TLS_25	BIT(0)
> +#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2_TLS_50	BIT(1)

This stuff:

  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR              (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc4)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR             (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc8)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP         (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xcc)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS              (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2            (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xf0)

*Looks* like it might be duplicates of:

  #define PCI_EXP_DEVCAP          0x04    /* Device capabilities */
  #define PCI_EXP_DEVCTL          0x08    /* Device Control */
  #define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP          0x0c    /* Link Capabilities */
  #define PCI_EXP_LNKCTL          0x10    /* Link Control */
  #define PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2         0x30    /* Link Control 2 */

where the PCIe Capability is at (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc0).

If so, can you please rework these to use the existing PCI_EXP_*
definitions, including the fields inside?

>  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_L1_SUBSTATE_CTRL2 (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x90c)
>  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x274)
>  #define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP_NEXT_MASK	GENMASK(31, 20)
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] PCI: pcie-rockchip: add bits for Target Link Speed in LCS_2
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:07:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610200744.GA820589@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEQb5kEOCJNQJMin@geday>

On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 08:00:54AM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> Link Control and Status Register 2 is not present in current
> pcie-rockchip.h definitions. Add it in preparation for
> setting it before Gen2 retraining.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index 14954f43e5e9..7a84899d3812 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@
>  #define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S		BIT(10)
>  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
>  #define PCIE_EP_CONFIG_LCS		(PCIE_EP_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
> +#define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xf0)
> +#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2_TLS_25	BIT(0)
> +#define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2_TLS_50	BIT(1)

This stuff:

  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR              (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc4)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR             (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc8)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP         (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xcc)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS              (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xd0)
  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS_2            (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xf0)

*Looks* like it might be duplicates of:

  #define PCI_EXP_DEVCAP          0x04    /* Device capabilities */
  #define PCI_EXP_DEVCTL          0x08    /* Device Control */
  #define PCI_EXP_LNKCAP          0x0c    /* Link Capabilities */
  #define PCI_EXP_LNKCTL          0x10    /* Link Control */
  #define PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2         0x30    /* Link Control 2 */

where the PCIe Capability is at (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0xc0).

If so, can you please rework these to use the existing PCI_EXP_*
definitions, including the fields inside?

>  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_L1_SUBSTATE_CTRL2 (PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x90c)
>  #define PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP		(PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + 0x274)
>  #define   PCIE_RC_CONFIG_THP_CAP_NEXT_MASK	GENMASK(31, 20)
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-07 11:00 [RFC PATCH 1/4] PCI: pcie-rockchip: add bits for Target Link Speed in LCS_2 Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-07 11:00 ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-07 11:00 ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-10 20:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-06-10 20:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-10 20:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-10 20:09   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-10 20:09     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-10 20:09     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-11  3:46   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-11  3:46     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-11  3:46     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-11  3:59     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-11  3:59       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-11  3:59       ` Geraldo Nascimento

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250610200744.GA820589@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.