From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org" <arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for scmi cpufreq
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:58:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250620035816.GA21846@nxa18884-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250422-vigorous-cockatoo-of-growth-bacdb7@sudeepholla>
Hi Sudeep,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 11:16:44AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 10:09:44PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:26:42PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> >Revert to old behaviour and driver request fw_devlink dependencies to
>> >be created if they rely on them. I am not sure if that is better approach.
>>
>> This requires to update various drivers(clk,power,perf,pinctrl,regulator) to
>> set the flag SCMI_DEV_SET_FWNODE.
>>
>> Using SCMI_DEV_NO_FWNODE would avoid updating the various drivers.
>>
>
>Agreed and good point.
>
>> Anyway, you decide which to go :)
>
>Still undecided 🙁
Is this still in you list?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
>--
>Regards,
>Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-25 8:20 [PATCH 0/4] scmi: Bypass set fwnode to address devlink issue Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-25 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for scmi cpufreq Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-27 15:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-12-30 2:05 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-31 18:07 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-02 7:38 ` Peng Fan
2025-01-02 17:06 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-06 4:37 ` Peng Fan
2025-02-11 17:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-12 7:01 ` Peng Fan
2025-02-12 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-13 8:03 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-02-13 20:23 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-02-18 1:09 ` Peng Fan
2025-02-18 10:24 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-18 13:36 ` Peng Fan
2025-02-19 10:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-20 0:59 ` Peng Fan
2025-03-10 9:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-10 10:45 ` Peng Fan
2025-03-10 11:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-10 13:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-11 8:36 ` Peng Fan
2025-03-11 11:12 ` Peng Fan
2025-03-11 11:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-12 10:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-12 11:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-13 5:23 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-09 3:50 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-09 11:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-04-17 14:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-04-20 14:09 ` Peng Fan
2025-04-22 10:16 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-06-20 3:58 ` Peng Fan [this message]
2024-12-25 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for pinctrl Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-27 15:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-12-30 2:08 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-31 18:16 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-06 4:41 ` Peng Fan
2025-01-14 8:31 ` Peng Fan
2025-01-14 10:07 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-15 7:22 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-31 18:13 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-12-25 8:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: scmi: Check fwnode instead of machine compatible Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-27 15:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-12-31 18:18 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-01-02 7:11 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-25 8:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: freescale: " Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-12-27 17:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] scmi: Bypass set fwnode to address devlink issue Linus Walleij
2024-12-30 2:12 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250620035816.GA21846@nxa18884-linux \
--to=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.