From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bnxt_en: eliminate the compile warning in bnxt_request_irq due to CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:15:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250701171501.32e77315@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL+tcoDUoPe05ZGhsoZX24MkaRZx=bRws+kY=MuEVQdy=3mM1A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 19:47:47 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > Not for net, but it would be nice to factor the #ifdefs out of this
> > function entirely. E.g. by using a helper to perform that part of the
> > initialisation.
>
> Got it. I will cook a patch after this patch is landed on the net-next branch.
Maybe we can fix it right already. The compiler should not complain if
it sees the read:
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index f621a5bab1ea..6bbe875132b0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -11616,11 +11616,9 @@ static void bnxt_free_irq(struct bnxt *bp)
static int bnxt_request_irq(struct bnxt *bp)
{
+ struct cpu_rmap *rmap = NULL;
int i, j, rc = 0;
unsigned long flags = 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
- struct cpu_rmap *rmap;
-#endif
rc = bnxt_setup_int_mode(bp);
if (rc) {
@@ -11641,15 +11639,15 @@ static int bnxt_request_irq(struct bnxt *bp)
int map_idx = bnxt_cp_num_to_irq_num(bp, i);
struct bnxt_irq *irq = &bp->irq_tbl[map_idx];
-#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
- if (rmap && bp->bnapi[i]->rx_ring) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL) &&
+ rmap && bp->bnapi[i]->rx_ring) {
rc = irq_cpu_rmap_add(rmap, irq->vector);
if (rc)
netdev_warn(bp->dev, "failed adding irq rmap for ring %d\n",
j);
j++;
}
-#endif
+
rc = request_irq(irq->vector, irq->handler, flags, irq->name,
bp->bnapi[i]);
if (rc)
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-29 0:36 [PATCH net] bnxt_en: eliminate the compile warning in bnxt_request_irq due to CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL Jason Xing
2025-06-30 11:09 ` Simon Horman
2025-06-30 11:47 ` Jason Xing
2025-07-02 0:15 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-07-02 0:47 ` Jason Xing
2025-07-02 0:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-02 1:07 ` Jason Xing
2025-07-02 1:11 ` Jason Xing
2025-07-02 1:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-01 4:07 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250701171501.32e77315@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.