From: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI FWFT to get-reg-list test
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 21:25:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250814155548.457172-7-apatel@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814155548.457172-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
KVM RISC-V now supports SBI FWFT, so add it to the get-reg-list test.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
index a0b7dabb5040..1bc84f09b4ee 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg)
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_DBCN:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_SUSP:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_STA:
+ case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_VENDOR:
return true;
@@ -627,6 +628,7 @@ static const char *sbi_ext_single_id_to_str(__u64 reg_off)
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_DBCN),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_SUSP),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_STA),
+ KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_VENDOR),
};
@@ -683,6 +685,17 @@ static const char *sbi_sta_id_to_str(__u64 reg_off)
return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA | %lld /* UNKNOWN */", reg_off);
}
+static const char *sbi_fwft_id_to_str(__u64 reg_off)
+{
+ switch (reg_off) {
+ case 0: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.flags)";
+ case 1: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.value)";
+ case 2: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.flags)";
+ case 3: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.value)";
+ }
+ return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA | %lld /* UNKNOWN */", reg_off);
+}
+
static const char *sbi_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
{
__u64 reg_off = id & ~(REG_MASK | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE);
@@ -695,6 +708,8 @@ static const char *sbi_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
switch (reg_subtype) {
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA:
return sbi_sta_id_to_str(reg_off);
+ case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT:
+ return sbi_fwft_id_to_str(reg_off);
}
return strdup_printf("%lld | %lld /* UNKNOWN */", reg_subtype, reg_off);
@@ -859,6 +874,14 @@ static __u64 sbi_sta_regs[] = {
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA_REG(shmem_hi),
};
+static __u64 sbi_fwft_regs[] = {
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT,
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.flags),
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.value),
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.flags),
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.value),
+};
+
static __u64 zicbom_regs[] = {
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG | KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(zicbom_block_size),
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM,
@@ -1010,6 +1033,9 @@ static __u64 vector_regs[] = {
#define SUBLIST_SBI_STA \
{"sbi-sta", .feature_type = VCPU_FEATURE_SBI_EXT, .feature = KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_STA, \
.regs = sbi_sta_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(sbi_sta_regs),}
+#define SUBLIST_SBI_FWFT \
+ {"sbi-fwft", .feature_type = VCPU_FEATURE_SBI_EXT, .feature = KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT, \
+ .regs = sbi_fwft_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(sbi_fwft_regs),}
#define SUBLIST_ZICBOM \
{"zicbom", .feature = KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, .regs = zicbom_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(zicbom_regs),}
#define SUBLIST_ZICBOZ \
@@ -1092,6 +1118,7 @@ KVM_SBI_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(sta, STA);
KVM_SBI_EXT_SIMPLE_CONFIG(pmu, PMU);
KVM_SBI_EXT_SIMPLE_CONFIG(dbcn, DBCN);
KVM_SBI_EXT_SIMPLE_CONFIG(susp, SUSP);
+KVM_SBI_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(fwft, FWFT);
KVM_ISA_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(aia, AIA);
KVM_ISA_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(fp_f, FP_F);
@@ -1167,6 +1194,7 @@ struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[] = {
&config_sbi_pmu,
&config_sbi_dbcn,
&config_sbi_susp,
+ &config_sbi_fwft,
&config_aia,
&config_fp_f,
&config_fp_d,
--
2.43.0
--
kvm-riscv mailing list
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kvm-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI FWFT to get-reg-list test
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 21:25:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250814155548.457172-7-apatel@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814155548.457172-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
KVM RISC-V now supports SBI FWFT, so add it to the get-reg-list test.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
index a0b7dabb5040..1bc84f09b4ee 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg)
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_DBCN:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_SUSP:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_STA:
+ case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_VENDOR:
return true;
@@ -627,6 +628,7 @@ static const char *sbi_ext_single_id_to_str(__u64 reg_off)
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_DBCN),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_SUSP),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_STA),
+ KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_VENDOR),
};
@@ -683,6 +685,17 @@ static const char *sbi_sta_id_to_str(__u64 reg_off)
return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA | %lld /* UNKNOWN */", reg_off);
}
+static const char *sbi_fwft_id_to_str(__u64 reg_off)
+{
+ switch (reg_off) {
+ case 0: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.flags)";
+ case 1: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.value)";
+ case 2: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.flags)";
+ case 3: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.value)";
+ }
+ return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA | %lld /* UNKNOWN */", reg_off);
+}
+
static const char *sbi_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
{
__u64 reg_off = id & ~(REG_MASK | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE);
@@ -695,6 +708,8 @@ static const char *sbi_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
switch (reg_subtype) {
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA:
return sbi_sta_id_to_str(reg_off);
+ case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT:
+ return sbi_fwft_id_to_str(reg_off);
}
return strdup_printf("%lld | %lld /* UNKNOWN */", reg_subtype, reg_off);
@@ -859,6 +874,14 @@ static __u64 sbi_sta_regs[] = {
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA_REG(shmem_hi),
};
+static __u64 sbi_fwft_regs[] = {
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT,
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.flags),
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.value),
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.flags),
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.value),
+};
+
static __u64 zicbom_regs[] = {
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG | KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(zicbom_block_size),
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM,
@@ -1010,6 +1033,9 @@ static __u64 vector_regs[] = {
#define SUBLIST_SBI_STA \
{"sbi-sta", .feature_type = VCPU_FEATURE_SBI_EXT, .feature = KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_STA, \
.regs = sbi_sta_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(sbi_sta_regs),}
+#define SUBLIST_SBI_FWFT \
+ {"sbi-fwft", .feature_type = VCPU_FEATURE_SBI_EXT, .feature = KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT, \
+ .regs = sbi_fwft_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(sbi_fwft_regs),}
#define SUBLIST_ZICBOM \
{"zicbom", .feature = KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, .regs = zicbom_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(zicbom_regs),}
#define SUBLIST_ZICBOZ \
@@ -1092,6 +1118,7 @@ KVM_SBI_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(sta, STA);
KVM_SBI_EXT_SIMPLE_CONFIG(pmu, PMU);
KVM_SBI_EXT_SIMPLE_CONFIG(dbcn, DBCN);
KVM_SBI_EXT_SIMPLE_CONFIG(susp, SUSP);
+KVM_SBI_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(fwft, FWFT);
KVM_ISA_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(aia, AIA);
KVM_ISA_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(fp_f, FP_F);
@@ -1167,6 +1194,7 @@ struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[] = {
&config_sbi_pmu,
&config_sbi_dbcn,
&config_sbi_susp,
+ &config_sbi_fwft,
&config_aia,
&config_fp_f,
&config_fp_d,
--
2.43.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI FWFT to get-reg-list test
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 21:25:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250814155548.457172-7-apatel@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814155548.457172-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
KVM RISC-V now supports SBI FWFT, so add it to the get-reg-list test.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
index a0b7dabb5040..1bc84f09b4ee 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg)
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_DBCN:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_SUSP:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_STA:
+ case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL:
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_VENDOR:
return true;
@@ -627,6 +628,7 @@ static const char *sbi_ext_single_id_to_str(__u64 reg_off)
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_DBCN),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_SUSP),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_STA),
+ KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL),
KVM_SBI_EXT_ARR(KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_VENDOR),
};
@@ -683,6 +685,17 @@ static const char *sbi_sta_id_to_str(__u64 reg_off)
return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA | %lld /* UNKNOWN */", reg_off);
}
+static const char *sbi_fwft_id_to_str(__u64 reg_off)
+{
+ switch (reg_off) {
+ case 0: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.flags)";
+ case 1: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.value)";
+ case 2: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.flags)";
+ case 3: return "KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.value)";
+ }
+ return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA | %lld /* UNKNOWN */", reg_off);
+}
+
static const char *sbi_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
{
__u64 reg_off = id & ~(REG_MASK | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE);
@@ -695,6 +708,8 @@ static const char *sbi_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
switch (reg_subtype) {
case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA:
return sbi_sta_id_to_str(reg_off);
+ case KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT:
+ return sbi_fwft_id_to_str(reg_off);
}
return strdup_printf("%lld | %lld /* UNKNOWN */", reg_subtype, reg_off);
@@ -859,6 +874,14 @@ static __u64 sbi_sta_regs[] = {
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STA_REG(shmem_hi),
};
+static __u64 sbi_fwft_regs[] = {
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT,
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.flags),
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(misaligned_deleg.value),
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.flags),
+ KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_STATE | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT | KVM_REG_RISCV_SBI_FWFT_REG(pointer_masking.value),
+};
+
static __u64 zicbom_regs[] = {
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG | KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(zicbom_block_size),
KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT | KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_SINGLE | KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM,
@@ -1010,6 +1033,9 @@ static __u64 vector_regs[] = {
#define SUBLIST_SBI_STA \
{"sbi-sta", .feature_type = VCPU_FEATURE_SBI_EXT, .feature = KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_STA, \
.regs = sbi_sta_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(sbi_sta_regs),}
+#define SUBLIST_SBI_FWFT \
+ {"sbi-fwft", .feature_type = VCPU_FEATURE_SBI_EXT, .feature = KVM_RISCV_SBI_EXT_FWFT, \
+ .regs = sbi_fwft_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(sbi_fwft_regs),}
#define SUBLIST_ZICBOM \
{"zicbom", .feature = KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, .regs = zicbom_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(zicbom_regs),}
#define SUBLIST_ZICBOZ \
@@ -1092,6 +1118,7 @@ KVM_SBI_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(sta, STA);
KVM_SBI_EXT_SIMPLE_CONFIG(pmu, PMU);
KVM_SBI_EXT_SIMPLE_CONFIG(dbcn, DBCN);
KVM_SBI_EXT_SIMPLE_CONFIG(susp, SUSP);
+KVM_SBI_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(fwft, FWFT);
KVM_ISA_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(aia, AIA);
KVM_ISA_EXT_SUBLIST_CONFIG(fp_f, FP_F);
@@ -1167,6 +1194,7 @@ struct vcpu_reg_list *vcpu_configs[] = {
&config_sbi_pmu,
&config_sbi_dbcn,
&config_sbi_susp,
+ &config_sbi_fwft,
&config_aia,
&config_fp_f,
&config_fp_d,
--
2.43.0
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 15:55 [PATCH 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] RISC-V: KVM: Set initial value of hedeleg in kvm_arch_vcpu_create() Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-15 20:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-15 20:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-15 20:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-19 9:01 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-19 9:01 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-19 9:01 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce feature specific reset for SBI FWFT Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-15 20:14 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-15 20:14 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-15 20:14 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-19 9:02 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-19 9:02 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-19 9:02 ` Nutty.Liu
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] RISC-V: KVM: Introduce optional ONE_REG callbacks for SBI extensions Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-15 21:00 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-15 21:00 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-15 21:00 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-17 12:04 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-17 12:04 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-17 12:04 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] RISC-V: KVM: Move copy_sbi_ext_reg_indices() to SBI implementation Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-15 21:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-15 21:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-15 21:04 ` Andrew Jones
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] RISC-V: KVM: Implement ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT state Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel [this message]
2025-08-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add SBI FWFT to get-reg-list test Anup Patel
2025-08-14 15:55 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-18 10:29 ` [PATCH 0/6] ONE_REG interface for SBI FWFT extension Radim Krčmář
2025-08-18 10:29 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-18 10:29 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 6:30 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 6:30 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 6:30 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 11:43 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 11:43 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 11:43 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 15:52 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 15:52 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 15:52 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-19 17:35 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 17:35 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-19 17:35 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-08-21 6:26 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-21 6:26 ` Anup Patel
2025-08-21 6:26 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250814155548.457172-7-apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--to=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.