From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Cc: <dave@stgolabs.net>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
<ming.li@zohomail.com>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
<rrichter@amd.com>, <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
<PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>, <lukas@wunner.de>,
<Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <alucerop@amd.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 16:33:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250829163355.00004fda@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827013539.903682-6-terry.bowman@amd.com>
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 20:35:20 -0500
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com> wrote:
> Restricted CXL Host (RCH) protocol error handling uses a procedure distinct
> from the CXL Virtual Hierarchy (VH) handling. This is because of the
> differences in the RCH and VH topologies. Improve the maintainability and
> add ability to enable/disable RCH handling.
>
> Move and combine the RCH handling code into a single block conditionally
> compiled with the CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS kernel config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
>
How painful to move this to a ras_rch.c file and conditionally compile that?
Would want to do that is some merged thing with patch 1 though, rather than
moving at least some of the code twice.
> ---
> v10->v11:
> - New patch
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> index 0875ce8116ff..f42f9a255ef8 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ void cxl_ras_exit(void)
> cancel_work_sync(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS
> static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> {
> resource_size_t aer_phys;
> @@ -141,18 +142,6 @@ static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> }
> }
>
> -static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> -{
> - struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
> - struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
> -
> - if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
> - dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
> - else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
> - BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
> - dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
> -}
> -
> static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> {
> void __iomem *aer_base = dport->regs.dport_aer;
> @@ -177,6 +166,95 @@ static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> writel(aer_cmd, aer_base + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
> + * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
> + * status after copying.
> + *
> + * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
> + * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
> + */
> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
> + struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
> +{
> + int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
> + u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
> + int n;
> +
> + if (!aer_base)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
> + for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
> + aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
> +
> + writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
> + writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
> + int *severity)
> +{
> + if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
> + if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
> + *severity = AER_FATAL;
> + else
> + *severity = AER_NONFATAL;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
> + *severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
> + struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
> + struct cxl_dport *dport;
> + int severity;
> +
> + struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
> + cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
> + if (!port)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
> + return;
> +
> + pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
> + if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
> + cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> + else
> + cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
> +static inline void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
> +static inline void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) { }
> +#endif
> +
> +static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> +{
> + struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
> + struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
> +
> + if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
> + else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
> + BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
> +}
>
> /**
> * cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting - Setup CXL RAS report on this dport
> @@ -270,79 +348,6 @@ static bool cxl_handle_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, void __iomem *ras_base)
> return true;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
> - * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
> - * status after copying.
> - *
> - * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
> - * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
> - */
> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
> - struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
> -{
> - int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
> - u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
> - int n;
> -
> - if (!aer_base)
> - return false;
> -
> - /* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
> - for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
> - aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
> -
> - writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
> - writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
> - int *severity)
> -{
> - if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
> - if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
> - *severity = AER_FATAL;
> - else
> - *severity = AER_NONFATAL;
> - return true;
> - }
> -
> - if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
> - *severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
> - return true;
> - }
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> -static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> -{
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
> - struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
> - struct cxl_dport *dport;
> - int severity;
> -
> - struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
> - cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
> - if (!port)
> - return;
> -
> - if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
> - return;
> -
> - if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
> - return;
> -
> - pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
> - if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
> - cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> - else
> - cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> -}
> -
> void cxl_cor_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 1:35 [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] cxl: Remove ifdef blocks of CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL from core/pci.c Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] CXL/AER: Remove CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL and replace with CONFIG_CXL_RAS Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 15:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 18:16 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL Endpoint handling helper functions Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 15:28 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL RCH " Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:35 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-08-28 17:32 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:57 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:43 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-09-11 17:48 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-15 13:32 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] CXL/AER: Introduce rch_aer.c into AER driver for handling CXL RCH errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 20:53 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29 8:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 17:01 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 17:26 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-12 13:59 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-12 19:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 16:56 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 12:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] CXL/PCI: Move CXL DVSEC definitions into uapi/linux/pci_regs.h Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 14:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-29 15:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-29 15:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-28 21:07 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:11 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 20:06 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] PCI/CXL: Introduce pcie_is_cxl() Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 8:18 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-10 16:24 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 3:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] PCI/AER: Report CXL or PCIe bus error type in trace logging Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:37 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:26 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-10 15:33 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-11 5:07 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] CXL/AER: Update PCI class code check to use FIELD_GET() Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 16:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 18:18 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] cxl/pci: Update RAS handler interfaces to also support CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] cxl/pci: Log message if RAS registers are unmapped Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] cxl/pci: Unify CXL trace logging for CXL Endpoints and CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 11:55 ` Shiju Jose
2025-08-29 16:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] cxl/pci: Update cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return early if no RAS errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] cxl/pci: Map CXL Endpoint Port and CXL Switch Port RAS registers Terry Bowman
2025-08-28 23:05 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 18:40 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] cxl/pci: Introduce CXL Endpoint protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 13:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] CXL/AER: Introduce cxl_aer.c into AER driver for forwarding CXL errors Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 7:56 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] PCI/AER: Dequeue forwarded CXL error Terry Bowman
2025-08-29 0:43 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-29 7:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-16 15:18 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 14:33 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 15:41 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 16:47 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:45 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL Port protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-08-30 0:17 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] CXL/PCI: Export and rename merge_result() to pci_ers_merge_result() Terry Bowman
2025-08-27 8:04 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-10 15:57 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 3:44 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-08-27 12:19 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL uncorrectable protocol error recovery Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 22:30 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-11 19:19 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-11 19:48 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] CXL/PCI: Enable CXL protocol errors during CXL Port probe Terry Bowman
2025-09-03 23:23 ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-27 1:35 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] CXL/PCI: Disable CXL protocol error interrupts during CXL Port cleanup Terry Bowman
2025-09-10 15:07 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-11 20:19 ` Bowman, Terry
2025-08-29 0:07 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Dave Jiang
2025-09-23 3:29 ` Gregory Price
2025-09-23 9:21 ` Srinivasulu Thanneeru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250829163355.00004fda@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.