* [PATCH] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in
@ 2025-08-03 21:21 Eric Biggers
2025-08-04 11:54 ` Jeff Layton
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2025-08-03 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever, Jeff Layton, linux-nfs
Cc: NeilBrown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey, Eric Biggers
Now that nfsd is accessing SHA-256 via the library API instead of via
crypto_shash, there is a direct symbol dependency on the SHA-256 code
and there is no benefit to be gained from forcing it to be built-in.
Therefore, select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 from NFSD (conditional on NFSD_V4)
instead of from NFSD_V4, so that it can be 'm' if NFSD is 'm'.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
---
fs/nfsd/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/Kconfig b/fs/nfsd/Kconfig
index 879e0b104d1c8..e134dce45e350 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/nfsd/Kconfig
@@ -3,10 +3,11 @@ config NFSD
tristate "NFS server support"
depends on INET
depends on FILE_LOCKING
depends on FSNOTIFY
select CRC32
+ select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 if NFSD_V4
select LOCKD
select SUNRPC
select EXPORTFS
select NFS_COMMON
select NFS_ACL_SUPPORT if NFSD_V2_ACL
@@ -75,11 +76,10 @@ config NFSD_V4
bool "NFS server support for NFS version 4"
depends on NFSD && PROC_FS
select FS_POSIX_ACL
select RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5
select CRYPTO
- select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256
select CRYPTO_MD5
select GRACE_PERIOD
select NFS_V4_2_SSC_HELPER if NFS_V4_2
help
This option enables support in your system's NFS server for
base-commit: 186f3edfdd41f2ae87fc40a9ccba52a3bf930994
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in
2025-08-03 21:21 [PATCH] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in Eric Biggers
@ 2025-08-04 11:54 ` Jeff Layton
2025-09-04 2:29 ` Eric Biggers
2025-09-05 14:28 ` Chuck Lever
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2025-08-04 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Biggers, Chuck Lever, linux-nfs
Cc: NeilBrown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
On Sun, 2025-08-03 at 14:21 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Now that nfsd is accessing SHA-256 via the library API instead of via
> crypto_shash, there is a direct symbol dependency on the SHA-256 code
> and there is no benefit to be gained from forcing it to be built-in.
> Therefore, select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 from NFSD (conditional on NFSD_V4)
> instead of from NFSD_V4, so that it can be 'm' if NFSD is 'm'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/Kconfig b/fs/nfsd/Kconfig
> index 879e0b104d1c8..e134dce45e350 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/Kconfig
> @@ -3,10 +3,11 @@ config NFSD
> tristate "NFS server support"
> depends on INET
> depends on FILE_LOCKING
> depends on FSNOTIFY
> select CRC32
> + select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 if NFSD_V4
> select LOCKD
> select SUNRPC
> select EXPORTFS
> select NFS_COMMON
> select NFS_ACL_SUPPORT if NFSD_V2_ACL
> @@ -75,11 +76,10 @@ config NFSD_V4
> bool "NFS server support for NFS version 4"
> depends on NFSD && PROC_FS
> select FS_POSIX_ACL
> select RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5
> select CRYPTO
> - select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256
> select CRYPTO_MD5
> select GRACE_PERIOD
> select NFS_V4_2_SSC_HELPER if NFS_V4_2
> help
> This option enables support in your system's NFS server for
>
> base-commit: 186f3edfdd41f2ae87fc40a9ccba52a3bf930994
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in
2025-08-03 21:21 [PATCH] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in Eric Biggers
2025-08-04 11:54 ` Jeff Layton
@ 2025-09-04 2:29 ` Eric Biggers
2025-09-04 13:21 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-05 14:28 ` Chuck Lever
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2025-09-04 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever, Jeff Layton, linux-nfs
Cc: NeilBrown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
On Sun, Aug 03, 2025 at 02:21:30PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Now that nfsd is accessing SHA-256 via the library API instead of via
> crypto_shash, there is a direct symbol dependency on the SHA-256 code
> and there is no benefit to be gained from forcing it to be built-in.
> Therefore, select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 from NFSD (conditional on NFSD_V4)
> instead of from NFSD_V4, so that it can be 'm' if NFSD is 'm'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Looks like this patch hasn't been applied yet. Could it be taken
through the nfs tree? Thanks,
- Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in
2025-09-04 2:29 ` Eric Biggers
@ 2025-09-04 13:21 ` Chuck Lever
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2025-09-04 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Biggers, Jeff Layton, linux-nfs
Cc: NeilBrown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
On 9/3/25 10:29 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2025 at 02:21:30PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> Now that nfsd is accessing SHA-256 via the library API instead of via
>> crypto_shash, there is a direct symbol dependency on the SHA-256 code
>> and there is no benefit to be gained from forcing it to be built-in.
>> Therefore, select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 from NFSD (conditional on NFSD_V4)
>> instead of from NFSD_V4, so that it can be 'm' if NFSD is 'm'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Looks like this patch hasn't been applied yet. Could it be taken
> through the nfs tree? Thanks,
>
> - Eric
For some reason, I marked this patch "superceded" in patchworks so it
got lost. I can apply it today.
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in
2025-08-03 21:21 [PATCH] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in Eric Biggers
2025-08-04 11:54 ` Jeff Layton
2025-09-04 2:29 ` Eric Biggers
@ 2025-09-05 14:28 ` Chuck Lever
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2025-09-05 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Layton, linux-nfs, Eric Biggers
Cc: Chuck Lever, NeilBrown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
On Sun, 03 Aug 2025 14:21:30 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Now that nfsd is accessing SHA-256 via the library API instead of via
> crypto_shash, there is a direct symbol dependency on the SHA-256 code
> and there is no benefit to be gained from forcing it to be built-in.
> Therefore, select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 from NFSD (conditional on NFSD_V4)
> instead of from NFSD_V4, so that it can be 'm' if NFSD is 'm'.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to nfsd-testing, thanks!
[1/1] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in
commit: 9c0d70a41f389ff1f15fd38fa47be5c3dd13c915
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-05 14:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-03 21:21 [PATCH] nfsd: Don't force CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256 to be built-in Eric Biggers
2025-08-04 11:54 ` Jeff Layton
2025-09-04 2:29 ` Eric Biggers
2025-09-04 13:21 ` Chuck Lever
2025-09-05 14:28 ` Chuck Lever
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.