From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
<yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Madadi Vineeth Reddy" <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
"Shrikanth Hegde" <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
"Yangyu Chen" <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 14:57:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510151429.2c3f3413-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00da49fd590b95baad0525660bda4c0ba178243d.1760206683.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "UBSAN:array-index-out-of-bounds_in_drivers/base/cacheinfo.c" on:
commit: e8b871200f11decae96692a3f5b385cdc25af231 ("[PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tim-Chen/sched-fair-Add-infrastructure-for-cache-aware-load-balancing/20251012-022248
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 45b7f780739a3145aeef24d2dfa02517a6c82ed6
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/00da49fd590b95baad0525660bda4c0ba178243d.1760206683.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com/
patch subject: [PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes
in testcase: boot
config: i386-randconfig-003-20251012
compiler: clang-20
test machine: qemu-system-i386 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 4G
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202510151429.2c3f3413-lkp@intel.com
[ 12.549731][ T83] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 12.550388][ T83] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/base/cacheinfo.c:37:9
[ 12.551060][ T83] index 4294967295 is out of range for type 'unsigned long[8]'
[ 12.551580][ T83] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 83 Comm: systemd-journal Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4-00035-ge8b871200f11 #1 PREEMPTLAZY
[ 12.551585][ T83] Call Trace:
[ 12.551588][ T83] __dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:95)
[ 12.551594][ T83] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
[ 12.551601][ T83] ubsan_epilogue.llvm.16751680356772289369 (lib/dump_stack.c:129 lib/ubsan.c:233)
[ 12.551607][ T83] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds (lib/ubsan.c:?)
[ 12.551621][ T83] get_cpu_cacheinfo (drivers/base/cacheinfo.c:?)
[ 12.551625][ T83] exceed_llc_capacity (include/linux/cacheinfo.h:? kernel/sched/fair.c:1256)
[ 12.551632][ T83] task_cache_work.llvm.12119588225164800824 (kernel/sched/fair.c:1527)
[ 12.551637][ T83] ? task_work_run (kernel/task_work.c:?)
[ 12.551641][ T83] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq (arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:42 arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:119 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:159 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:202)
[ 12.551644][ T83] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check (lib/smp_processor_id.c:65)
[ 12.551648][ T83] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4472)
[ 12.551650][ T83] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq (arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:42 arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:119 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:159 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:202)
[ 12.551652][ T83] ? task_work_run (kernel/task_work.c:?)
[ 12.551655][ T83] ? trace_hardirqs_on (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:80)
[ 12.551662][ T83] task_work_run (kernel/task_work.c:229)
[ 12.551668][ T83] resume_user_mode_work (include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:?)
[ 12.551673][ T83] irqentry_exit_to_user_mode (kernel/entry/common.c:53 include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:225 kernel/entry/common.c:73)
[ 12.551676][ T83] ? sysvec_call_function_single (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1050)
[ 12.551681][ T83] irqentry_exit (kernel/entry/common.c:210)
[ 12.551684][ T83] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1050)
[ 12.551689][ T83] handle_exception (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:1055)
[ 12.551691][ T83] EIP: 0x3764e8f0
[ 12.551694][ T83] Code: 00 00 89 c2 eb d2 65 c7 05 28 02 00 00 ff ff ff ff 65 a1 08 00 00 00 f0 83 88 84 00 00 00 10 65 a1 80 00 00 00 e8 f0 02 00 00 <8b> 44 24 04 8b 54 24 08 89 10 8b 54 24 0c 89 50 04 65 8b 15 7c 00
All code
========
0: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
2: 89 c2 mov %eax,%edx
4: eb d2 jmp 0xffffffffffffffd8
6: 65 c7 05 28 02 00 00 movl $0xffffffff,%gs:0x228(%rip) # 0x239
d: ff ff ff ff
11: 65 a1 08 00 00 00 f0 movabs %gs:0x848883f000000008,%eax
18: 83 88 84
1b: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
1d: 00 10 add %dl,(%rax)
1f: 65 a1 80 00 00 00 e8 movabs %gs:0x2f0e800000080,%eax
26: f0 02 00
29:* 00 8b 44 24 04 8b add %cl,-0x74fbdbbc(%rbx) <-- trapping instruction
2f: 54 push %rsp
30: 24 08 and $0x8,%al
32: 89 10 mov %edx,(%rax)
34: 8b 54 24 0c mov 0xc(%rsp),%edx
38: 89 50 04 mov %edx,0x4(%rax)
3b: 65 gs
3c: 8b .byte 0x8b
3d: 15 .byte 0x15
3e: 7c 00 jl 0x40
Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
0: 8b 44 24 04 mov 0x4(%rsp),%eax
4: 8b 54 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%edx
8: 89 10 mov %edx,(%rax)
a: 8b 54 24 0c mov 0xc(%rsp),%edx
e: 89 50 04 mov %edx,0x4(%rax)
11: 65 gs
12: 8b .byte 0x8b
13: 15 .byte 0x15
14: 7c 00 jl 0x16
[ 12.551696][ T83] EAX: 3fdacc1c EBX: 36a49ba8 ECX: 36a49d64 EDX: 00000001
[ 12.551697][ T83] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 36a49b40 EBP: 00000000 ESP: 3fdacbdc
[ 12.551699][ T83] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b EFLAGS: 00200212
[ 12.551708][ T83] ? sysvec_call_function_single (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1050)
[ 12.551717][ T83] ---[ end trace ]---
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251015/202510151429.2c3f3413-lkp@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-11 18:24 [PATCH 00/19] Cache Aware Scheduling Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 01/19] sched/fair: Add infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-14 19:12 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-15 4:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 19:32 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-16 3:11 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-23 7:26 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-27 4:47 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 13:35 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 02/19] sched/fair: Record per-LLC utilization to guide cache-aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2025-10-15 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:27 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27 5:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 14:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 2:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 03/19] sched/fair: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 04/19] sched/fair: Introduce a static key to enable cache aware only for multi LLCs Tim Chen
2025-10-15 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 16:36 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-10-15 17:01 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-16 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-17 2:08 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-16 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-27 5:42 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 12:56 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27 23:36 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-29 12:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 2:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 05/19] sched/fair: Add LLC index mapping for CPUs Tim Chen
2025-10-15 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:12 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 06/19] sched/fair: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2025-10-14 5:16 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-16 3:13 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-17 4:50 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-20 9:41 ` Vern Hao
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 07/19] sched/fair: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:03 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-16 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-16 20:06 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-27 6:04 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 15:15 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 15:46 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-29 4:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-29 12:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-29 4:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 17:06 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 08/19] sched/fair: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:41 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-16 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-21 8:28 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-23 6:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 09/19] sched/fair: Count tasks prefering each LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:42 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:43 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-27 8:33 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 23:19 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 10/19] sched/fair: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-15 7:23 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-15 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 21:28 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-15 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:03 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-24 9:32 ` Aaron Lu
2025-10-27 2:00 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-29 9:51 ` Aaron Lu
2025-10-29 13:19 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27 6:29 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 12:11 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 11/19] sched/fair: Identify busiest sched_group for LLC-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-15 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 21:18 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 12/19] sched/fair: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-27 9:04 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 22:59 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 13/19] sched/fair: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 14/19] sched/fair: Consider LLC preference when selecting tasks for load balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 15/19] sched/fair: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2025-10-28 6:02 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 11:58 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 15:30 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-29 4:15 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-29 3:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-29 14:23 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-29 21:09 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-30 4:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-30 20:07 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-31 3:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-31 15:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-11-03 21:41 ` Tim Chen
2025-11-03 22:07 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 16/19] sched/fair: Exclude processes with many threads from cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-10-23 7:22 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 17/19] sched/fair: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2025-10-22 17:21 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-23 6:55 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2025-10-15 6:57 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-10-16 4:44 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 19/19] sched/fair: Add user control to adjust the tolerance of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-10-29 8:07 ` Aaron Lu
2025-10-29 12:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-14 12:13 ` [PATCH 00/19] Cache Aware Scheduling Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-14 21:48 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-15 5:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 18:26 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-16 4:57 ` Chen, Yu C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202510151429.2c3f3413-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.