From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
<yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Madadi Vineeth Reddy" <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/19] sched/fair: Exclude processes with many threads from cache-aware scheduling
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:22:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510231406.30bc8aec-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <637cdb8ab11b1b978d697ed744cc402d32443ecc.1760206683.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a 2.1% regression of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops on:
commit: cb57b28051ef1d84e7cb14db4e1ab99b4f33b4b5 ("[PATCH 16/19] sched/fair: Exclude processes with many threads from cache-aware scheduling")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tim-Chen/sched-fair-Add-infrastructure-for-cache-aware-load-balancing/20251012-022248
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 45b7f780739a3145aeef24d2dfa02517a6c82ed6
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/637cdb8ab11b1b978d697ed744cc402d32443ecc.1760206683.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com/
patch subject: [PATCH 16/19] sched/fair: Exclude processes with many threads from cache-aware scheduling
testcase: will-it-scale
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 48 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz (Ivy Bridge-EP) with 64G memory
parameters:
nr_task: 100%
mode: thread
test: tlb_flush2
cpufreq_governor: performance
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202510231406.30bc8aec-lkp@intel.com
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251023/202510231406.30bc8aec-lkp@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-14/performance/x86_64-rhel-9.4/thread/100%/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/lkp-ivb-2ep2/tlb_flush2/will-it-scale
commit:
4ac141e433 ("sched/fair: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach")
cb57b28051 ("sched/fair: Exclude processes with many threads from cache-aware scheduling")
4ac141e4330723c0 cb57b28051ef1d84e7cb14db4e1
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
1482496 -2.1% 1451299 will-it-scale.48.threads
30884 -2.1% 30235 will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
1482496 -2.1% 1451299 will-it-scale.workload
4.447e+08 -2.1% 4.355e+08 proc-vmstat.numa_hit
4.447e+08 -2.1% 4.355e+08 proc-vmstat.numa_local
4.447e+08 -2.1% 4.354e+08 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
8.884e+08 -2.1% 8.698e+08 proc-vmstat.pgfault
4.446e+08 -2.1% 4.353e+08 proc-vmstat.pgfree
6.446e+09 -2.0% 6.318e+09 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
1.462e+08 -1.4% 1.441e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-misses
1.467e+08 -1.6% 1.444e+08 perf-stat.i.cache-misses
7.692e+08 -1.4% 7.587e+08 perf-stat.i.cache-references
101348 ± 2% +3.6% 104965 perf-stat.i.context-switches
4.14 +1.9% 4.22 perf-stat.i.cpi
883.41 +1.4% 896.20 perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
3.083e+10 -2.0% 3.022e+10 perf-stat.i.instructions
0.24 -1.8% 0.24 perf-stat.i.ipc
124.71 -2.0% 122.18 perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec
2944589 -2.1% 2882055 perf-stat.i.minor-faults
2944589 -2.1% 2882055 perf-stat.i.page-faults
4.17 +1.9% 4.25 perf-stat.overall.cpi
876.76 +1.5% 889.96 perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
0.24 -1.8% 0.24 perf-stat.overall.ipc
6.417e+09 -2.0% 6.29e+09 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
1.455e+08 -1.4% 1.434e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
1.46e+08 -1.6% 1.436e+08 perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
7.653e+08 -1.4% 7.549e+08 perf-stat.ps.cache-references
100692 ± 2% +3.6% 104309 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
3.069e+10 -2.0% 3.008e+10 perf-stat.ps.instructions
2931887 -2.1% 2869944 perf-stat.ps.minor-faults
2931887 -2.1% 2869944 perf-stat.ps.page-faults
9.273e+12 -1.9% 9.096e+12 perf-stat.total.instructions
62.03 -1.8 60.18 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.on_each_cpu_cond_mask.flush_tlb_mm_range.tlb_finish_mmu.do_madvise.__x64_sys_madvise
63.66 -1.8 61.82 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.flush_tlb_mm_range.tlb_finish_mmu.do_madvise.__x64_sys_madvise.do_syscall_64
61.19 -1.8 59.36 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.smp_call_function_many_cond.on_each_cpu_cond_mask.flush_tlb_mm_range.tlb_finish_mmu.do_madvise
65.49 -1.7 63.79 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tlb_finish_mmu.do_madvise.__x64_sys_madvise.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
75.54 -1.5 74.02 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__madvise
71.89 -1.5 70.41 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_madvise.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__madvise
72.40 -1.5 70.92 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__madvise
71.83 -1.5 70.35 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_madvise.__x64_sys_madvise.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__madvise
72.35 -1.5 70.87 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__madvise
15.31 -0.6 14.70 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.asm_sysvec_call_function.smp_call_function_many_cond.on_each_cpu_cond_mask.flush_tlb_mm_range.tlb_finish_mmu
12.04 -0.5 11.52 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sysvec_call_function.asm_sysvec_call_function.smp_call_function_many_cond.on_each_cpu_cond_mask.flush_tlb_mm_range
10.97 -0.5 10.47 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__flush_smp_call_function_queue.__sysvec_call_function.sysvec_call_function.asm_sysvec_call_function.smp_call_function_many_cond
11.08 -0.5 10.58 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__sysvec_call_function.sysvec_call_function.asm_sysvec_call_function.smp_call_function_many_cond.on_each_cpu_cond_mask
4.36 -0.2 4.15 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.flush_tlb_func.__flush_smp_call_function_queue.__sysvec_call_function.sysvec_call_function.asm_sysvec_call_function
4.53 -0.2 4.34 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.llist_reverse_order.__flush_smp_call_function_queue.__sysvec_call_function.sysvec_call_function.asm_sysvec_call_function
2.02 ± 2% -0.1 1.95 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.lock_vma_under_rcu.do_user_addr_fault.exc_page_fault.asm_exc_page_fault.testcase
1.47 -0.1 1.42 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.folio_add_lru.do_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault.handle_mm_fault.do_user_addr_fault
0.83 ± 2% -0.0 0.80 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.asm_sysvec_call_function.do_user_addr_fault.exc_page_fault.asm_exc_page_fault.testcase
0.65 ± 2% -0.0 0.62 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__sysvec_call_function.sysvec_call_function.asm_sysvec_call_function.do_user_addr_fault.exc_page_fault
0.73 ± 2% -0.0 0.70 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sysvec_call_function.asm_sysvec_call_function.do_user_addr_fault.exc_page_fault.asm_exc_page_fault
0.64 ± 2% -0.0 0.61 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__flush_smp_call_function_queue.__sysvec_call_function.sysvec_call_function.asm_sysvec_call_function.do_user_addr_fault
0.73 -0.0 0.71 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__sysvec_call_function.sysvec_call_function.asm_sysvec_call_function.testcase
0.84 -0.0 0.82 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.clear_page_erms.prep_new_page.get_page_from_freelist.__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof.alloc_pages_mpol
1.65 +0.0 1.68 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof.alloc_pages_mpol.vma_alloc_folio_noprof.alloc_anon_folio.do_anonymous_page
1.92 +0.0 1.96 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vma_alloc_folio_noprof.alloc_anon_folio.do_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault.handle_mm_fault
1.79 +0.0 1.83 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.alloc_pages_mpol.vma_alloc_folio_noprof.alloc_anon_folio.do_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault
0.92 ± 3% +0.1 1.04 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tlb_gather_mmu.do_madvise.__x64_sys_madvise.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
2.83 ± 6% +0.2 3.04 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.intel_idle.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter.cpuidle_idle_call.do_idle
7.06 +0.4 7.48 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__handle_mm_fault.handle_mm_fault.do_user_addr_fault.exc_page_fault.asm_exc_page_fault
6.25 +0.4 6.70 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault.handle_mm_fault.do_user_addr_fault.exc_page_fault
2.48 +0.5 3.02 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.alloc_anon_folio.do_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault.handle_mm_fault.do_user_addr_fault
0.00 +0.7 0.74 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.get_mem_cgroup_from_mm.__mem_cgroup_charge.alloc_anon_folio.do_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault
0.00 +0.9 0.94 ± 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__mem_cgroup_charge.alloc_anon_folio.do_anonymous_page.__handle_mm_fault.handle_mm_fault
19.08 +1.3 20.36 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.testcase
14.17 +1.3 15.46 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.asm_exc_page_fault.testcase
12.74 +1.4 14.10 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.exc_page_fault.asm_exc_page_fault.testcase
12.49 +1.4 13.85 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_user_addr_fault.exc_page_fault.asm_exc_page_fault.testcase
7.97 +1.4 9.38 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.handle_mm_fault.do_user_addr_fault.exc_page_fault.asm_exc_page_fault.testcase
62.25 -1.9 60.39 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.smp_call_function_many_cond
62.26 -1.9 60.40 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.on_each_cpu_cond_mask
63.94 -1.8 62.08 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.flush_tlb_mm_range
65.76 -1.7 64.06 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tlb_finish_mmu
75.72 -1.5 74.19 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__madvise
73.51 -1.5 72.02 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
73.48 -1.5 71.99 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64
71.90 -1.5 70.41 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_madvise
71.85 -1.5 70.36 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_madvise
18.46 -0.3 18.12 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__flush_smp_call_function_queue
19.79 -0.3 19.47 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.sysvec_call_function
22.68 -0.3 22.36 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.asm_sysvec_call_function
17.97 -0.3 17.65 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__sysvec_call_function
7.64 -0.2 7.46 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.flush_tlb_func
7.49 -0.1 7.39 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.llist_reverse_order
1.47 -0.1 1.42 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.folio_add_lru
1.99 -0.0 1.94 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__pte_offset_map_lock
1.84 -0.0 1.80 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock
1.31 -0.0 1.27 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.folio_batch_move_lru
0.93 -0.0 0.90 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.error_entry
0.42 -0.0 0.40 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vms_clear_ptes
0.89 -0.0 0.87 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.clear_page_erms
0.94 -0.0 0.92 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.prep_new_page
1.66 +0.0 1.69 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof
1.80 +0.0 1.84 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.alloc_pages_mpol
0.00 +0.1 0.05 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__pi_memset
0.96 ± 3% +0.1 1.08 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tlb_gather_mmu
2.90 ± 6% +0.2 3.10 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.intel_idle
3.23 ± 5% +0.2 3.45 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter
3.32 ± 5% +0.2 3.54 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpuidle_idle_call
7.09 +0.4 7.51 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__handle_mm_fault
6.27 +0.4 6.72 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_anonymous_page
0.43 ± 6% +0.5 0.94 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__mem_cgroup_charge
0.25 ± 11% +0.5 0.76 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_mem_cgroup_from_mm
2.49 +0.5 3.03 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.alloc_anon_folio
19.67 +1.3 20.94 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.testcase
14.47 +1.3 15.77 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.asm_exc_page_fault
12.76 +1.4 14.12 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.exc_page_fault
12.60 +1.4 13.96 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_user_addr_fault
7.99 +1.5 9.44 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.handle_mm_fault
42.94 -1.2 41.71 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.smp_call_function_many_cond
6.02 -0.2 5.87 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.flush_tlb_func
7.46 -0.1 7.36 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.llist_reverse_order
1.44 -0.0 1.40 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.lock_vma_under_rcu
0.88 -0.0 0.85 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
0.91 -0.0 0.88 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.error_entry
0.07 +0.0 0.08 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_page_from_freelist
0.76 ± 2% +0.1 0.86 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.tlb_gather_mmu
1.10 ± 5% +0.1 1.24 ± 2% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.tlb_finish_mmu
2.90 ± 6% +0.2 3.10 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.intel_idle
0.20 ± 10% +0.4 0.62 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_mem_cgroup_from_mm
0.15 ± 4% +0.8 1.00 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.handle_mm_fault
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-11 18:24 [PATCH 00/19] Cache Aware Scheduling Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 01/19] sched/fair: Add infrastructure for cache-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-14 19:12 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-15 4:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 19:32 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-16 3:11 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-23 7:26 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-27 4:47 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 13:35 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 02/19] sched/fair: Record per-LLC utilization to guide cache-aware scheduling decisions Tim Chen
2025-10-15 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:27 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27 5:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 14:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 2:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 03/19] sched/fair: Introduce helper functions to enforce LLC migration policy Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 04/19] sched/fair: Introduce a static key to enable cache aware only for multi LLCs Tim Chen
2025-10-15 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:25 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 16:36 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-10-15 17:01 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-16 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-17 2:08 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-16 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-27 5:42 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 12:56 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27 23:36 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-29 12:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 2:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 05/19] sched/fair: Add LLC index mapping for CPUs Tim Chen
2025-10-15 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:12 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 06/19] sched/fair: Assign preferred LLC ID to processes Tim Chen
2025-10-14 5:16 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-16 3:13 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-17 4:50 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-20 9:41 ` Vern Hao
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 07/19] sched/fair: Track LLC-preferred tasks per runqueue Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:03 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-16 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-16 20:06 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-27 6:04 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 15:15 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 15:46 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-29 4:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-29 12:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-29 4:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 17:06 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 08/19] sched/fair: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:41 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-16 7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-21 8:28 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-23 6:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 09/19] sched/fair: Count tasks prefering each LLC in a sched group Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:42 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-15 12:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 20:43 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-27 8:33 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 23:19 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 10/19] sched/fair: Prioritize tasks preferring destination LLC during balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-15 7:23 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-15 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 21:28 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-15 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 16:03 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-24 9:32 ` Aaron Lu
2025-10-27 2:00 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-29 9:51 ` Aaron Lu
2025-10-29 13:19 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-27 6:29 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 12:11 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 11/19] sched/fair: Identify busiest sched_group for LLC-aware load balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-15 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-15 21:18 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 12/19] sched/fair: Add migrate_llc_task migration type for cache-aware balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-27 9:04 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-27 22:59 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 13/19] sched/fair: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 14/19] sched/fair: Consider LLC preference when selecting tasks for load balancing Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 15/19] sched/fair: Respect LLC preference in task migration and detach Tim Chen
2025-10-28 6:02 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-28 11:58 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-28 15:30 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-29 4:15 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-29 3:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-29 14:23 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-29 21:09 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-30 4:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-30 20:07 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-31 3:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-10-31 15:17 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-11-03 21:41 ` Tim Chen
2025-11-03 22:07 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 16/19] sched/fair: Exclude processes with many threads from cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-10-23 7:22 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 17/19] sched/fair: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2025-10-22 17:21 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-23 6:55 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 18/19] sched/fair: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2025-10-15 6:57 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-16 4:44 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-11 18:24 ` [PATCH 19/19] sched/fair: Add user control to adjust the tolerance of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-10-29 8:07 ` Aaron Lu
2025-10-29 12:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-14 12:13 ` [PATCH 00/19] Cache Aware Scheduling Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-14 21:48 ` Tim Chen
2025-10-15 5:38 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-15 18:26 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-10-16 4:57 ` Chen, Yu C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202510231406.30bc8aec-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
--cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.