From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] xfs: set lv_bytes in xlog_write_one_vec
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 11:43:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251103104318.GA9158@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251101000409.GR3356773@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 05:04:09PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > index ed83a0e3578e..382c55f4d8d2 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> > @@ -858,14 +858,15 @@ xlog_write_one_vec(
> > struct xfs_log_vec lv = {
> > .lv_niovecs = 1,
> > .lv_iovecp = reg,
> > + .lv_bytes = reg->i_len,
>
> I'm surprised that nothing's noticed the zero lv_bytes, but I guess
> unmount and commit record writes have always wanted a full write anyway?
>
> Question: if lv_bytes is no longer zero, can this fall into the
> xlog_write_partial branch?
The unmount format is smaller than an opheader, so we won't split it
because of that, but unless I'm misreading things it could fix a bug
where we'd not get a new iclog when needed for it otherwise?
The commit record is just an an opheader without any payload, so there
is no way to even split it in theory.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-03 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 14:49 cleanup log item formatting v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: add a xlog_write_one_vec helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 23:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: set lv_bytes in xlog_write_one_vec Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 0:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-03 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-04 23:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-05 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 22:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: improve the ->iop_format interface Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 0:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: move struct xfs_log_iovec to xfs_log_priv.h Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 1:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: move struct xfs_log_vec " Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 1:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: regularize iclog space accounting in xlog_write_partial Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-05 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: improve the calling convention for the xlog_write helpers Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 3:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-03 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-05 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: add a xlog_write_space_left helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-01 3:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: improve the iclog space assert in xlog_write_iovec Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-10-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: factor out a xlog_write_space_advance helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-04 23:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-12 12:14 cleanup log item formatting v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-12 12:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: set lv_bytes in xlog_write_one_vec Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-14 16:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251103104318.GA9158@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.