* [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts
@ 2025-11-10 5:00 Brian Sune
2025-11-12 16:35 ` Sune Brian
2025-11-17 9:08 ` Chee, Tien Fong
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brian Sune @ 2025-11-10 5:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini, u-boot
The dtsi for socfpga common should
turn on L2 and memory and no reason not
to do so
Signed-off-by: Brian Sune <briansune@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
index eb3d1039314..ff9da15665f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
* Copyright (c) 2019 Simon Goldschmidt
*/
/{
+ memory {
+ bootph-all;
+ };
+
soc {
bootph-all;
};
@@ -14,6 +18,10 @@
bootph-all;
};
+&L2 {
+ bootph-all;
+};
+
&rst {
bootph-all;
};
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts
2025-11-10 5:00 [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts Brian Sune
@ 2025-11-12 16:35 ` Sune Brian
2025-11-12 16:41 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-17 9:08 ` Chee, Tien Fong
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sune Brian @ 2025-11-12 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini, u-boot
> The dtsi for socfpga common should
> turn on L2 and memory and no reason not
> to do so
Hi Tom,
Do TIENFONG still handles patches on SoCFPGA? Seems like there are
no action or response on all SoCFPGA related patches?
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts
2025-11-12 16:35 ` Sune Brian
@ 2025-11-12 16:41 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-12 16:55 ` Sune Brian
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2025-11-12 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sune Brian; +Cc: u-boot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 414 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 12:35:01AM +0800, Sune Brian wrote:
> > The dtsi for socfpga common should
> > turn on L2 and memory and no reason not
> > to do so
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Do TIENFONG still handles patches on SoCFPGA? Seems like there are
> no action or response on all SoCFPGA related patches?
Yes, he's Tien Fong is still active, it's just that most subsystems are
fairly slow moving.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts
2025-11-12 16:41 ` Tom Rini
@ 2025-11-12 16:55 ` Sune Brian
2025-11-12 16:57 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sune Brian @ 2025-11-12 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: u-boot
> > Do TIENFONG still handles patches on SoCFPGA? Seems like there are
> > no action or response on all SoCFPGA related patches?
>
> Yes, he's Tien Fong is still active, it's just that most subsystems are
> fairly slow moving.
For patches that really affect normal boot should push back
to mainstream. Those patches really fixes the boot and w/o it
system completely stall.
For those that are more less critical can be handle in slower pace.
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts
2025-11-12 16:55 ` Sune Brian
@ 2025-11-12 16:57 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-12 17:08 ` Sune Brian
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2025-11-12 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sune Brian; +Cc: u-boot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 746 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 12:55:04AM +0800, Sune Brian wrote:
> > > Do TIENFONG still handles patches on SoCFPGA? Seems like there are
> > > no action or response on all SoCFPGA related patches?
> >
> > Yes, he's Tien Fong is still active, it's just that most subsystems are
> > fairly slow moving.
>
> For patches that really affect normal boot should push back
> to mainstream. Those patches really fixes the boot and w/o it
> system completely stall.
> For those that are more less critical can be handle in slower pace.
If there's not a PR with them by rc4 or so, please do call out
individual patches that need to be picked up, that's typically how I
handle critical patches that haven't been grabbed yet. Thanks!
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts
2025-11-12 16:57 ` Tom Rini
@ 2025-11-12 17:08 ` Sune Brian
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sune Brian @ 2025-11-12 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini; +Cc: u-boot
> > > > Do TIENFONG still handles patches on SoCFPGA? Seems like there are
> > > > no action or response on all SoCFPGA related patches?
> > >
> > > Yes, he's Tien Fong is still active, it's just that most subsystems are
> > > fairly slow moving.
> >
> > For patches that really affect normal boot should push back
> > to mainstream. Those patches really fixes the boot and w/o it
> > system completely stall.
> > For those that are more less critical can be handle in slower pace.
>
> If there's not a PR with them by rc4 or so, please do call out
> individual patches that need to be picked up, that's typically how I
> handle critical patches that haven't been grabbed yet. Thanks!
There is one critical patch that breaks the boot completely.
"[v4] Altera SoCFpga Boot Stall Fix"
20251020133455.1870-1-briansune@gmail.com
The other patch that is less critical but SDRAM involves
communication will stall.
"FPGA2SDRAM setup fix"
20251020133554.1901-1-briansune@gmail.com
Other than that are all non-critical.
The original issue is Altera just consider the new
SoCFPGA series and accidentally remove the
if-else case for old GEN5.
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts
2025-11-10 5:00 [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts Brian Sune
2025-11-12 16:35 ` Sune Brian
@ 2025-11-17 9:08 ` Chee, Tien Fong
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chee, Tien Fong @ 2025-11-17 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Sune, Tom Rini, u-boot
On 10/11/2025 1:00 pm, Brian Sune wrote:
> The dtsi for socfpga common should
> turn on L2 and memory and no reason not
> to do so
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Sune <briansune@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
> index eb3d1039314..ff9da15665f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
> @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
> * Copyright (c) 2019 Simon Goldschmidt
> */
> /{
> + memory {
> + bootph-all;
> + };
> +
> soc {
> bootph-all;
> };
> @@ -14,6 +18,10 @@
> bootph-all;
> };
>
> +&L2 {
> + bootph-all;
> +};
> +
> &rst {
> bootph-all;
> };
Reviewed-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@altera.com>
Best regards,
Tien Fong
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-17 9:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-10 5:00 [PATCH v1] sync socfpga common u-boot dts Brian Sune
2025-11-12 16:35 ` Sune Brian
2025-11-12 16:41 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-12 16:55 ` Sune Brian
2025-11-12 16:57 ` Tom Rini
2025-11-12 17:08 ` Sune Brian
2025-11-17 9:08 ` Chee, Tien Fong
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.