All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	david@kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
	baohua@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 2/2] mm/huge_memory: merge uniform_split_supported() and non_uniform_split_supported()
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 10:39:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251121103945.13934959041672e76dd34ecb@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31B02667-2F69-442B-AD91-6C0A7823BA05@nvidia.com>

On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 12:00:51 -0500 Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> wrote:

> On 21 Nov 2025, at 11:50, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 09:59:42 -0500 Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> 2. A further cleanup attempt:
> >>>
> >>>  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/136E8B1C-3352-412C-8038-627F5CC8A112@nvidia.com
> >>>
> >>> This one is the related mail.
> >>>
> >>> I proposed one version in
> >>>
> >>>  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251114075703.10434-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>> But it is not proper, will do follow up work later.
> >>
> >> Please refrain from sending more patches related to __folio_split() and its
> >> related functions until the above hotfix is merged.
> >
> > You're referring to
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251119235302.24773-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> >
> >> I also have an ongoing
> >> cleanup patchset[1] and want to get it in before any other changes.
> >
> > I remain unclear on the status of this patchset.  Is it considered good
> > to upstream or is additional work required?
> 
> I am still having a discussion with David Hildenbrand about it and hopefully
> get it sorted out soon. The reason is that the above hotfix is good for
> backport but future user of folio_split_supported() can still dereference
> a NULL folio->mapping unless they check folio->mapping != NULL beforehand.
> I would like to avoid that by refactoring folio_split_support().
> 
> Wei’s further cleanup patch can come after my refactoring by just moving
> a code hunk above.
> 

This is coming down to the wire.  I'm considering dropping

mm-huge_memory-introduce-enum-split_type-for-clarity.patch
mm-huge_memory-introduce-enum-split_type-for-clarity-fix.patch
mm-huge_memory-merge-uniform_split_supported-and-non_uniform_split_supported.patch

and

mm-huge_memoryc-introduce-folio_split_unmapped.patch
mm-huge_memoryc-introduce-folio_split_unmapped-v2.patch
mm-huge_memoryc-introduce-folio_split_unmapped-v2-fix.patch
mm-huge_memoryc-introduce-folio_split_unmapped-v2-fix-fix.patch

and we can revisit after the upcoming merge window.  Thoughts?


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-21 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-06  3:41 [Patch v3 0/2] mm/huge_memory: Define split_type and consolidate split support checks Wei Yang
2025-11-06  3:41 ` [Patch v3 1/2] mm/huge_memory: introduce enum split_type for clarity Wei Yang
2025-11-06 10:17   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-06 14:57     ` Wei Yang
2025-11-07  0:44   ` Zi Yan
2025-11-06  3:41 ` [Patch v3 2/2] mm/huge_memory: merge uniform_split_supported() and non_uniform_split_supported() Wei Yang
2025-11-06 10:20   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-07  0:46   ` Zi Yan
2025-11-07  1:17     ` Wei Yang
2025-11-07  2:07       ` Zi Yan
2025-11-07  2:49         ` Wei Yang
2025-11-07  3:21           ` Zi Yan
2025-11-07  7:29             ` Wei Yang
2025-11-14  3:03               ` Wei Yang
2025-11-17  1:22   ` Wei Yang
2025-11-17 15:56     ` Zi Yan
2025-11-18  2:10       ` Wei Yang
2025-11-18  3:33       ` Wei Yang
2025-11-18  4:10         ` Zi Yan
2025-11-18 18:32           ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-18 18:55             ` Zi Yan
2025-11-18 22:06               ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-19  0:52                 ` Wei Yang
2025-11-20 21:16                   ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-21  0:55                     ` Zi Yan
2025-11-21  9:00                     ` Wei Yang
2025-11-21 14:59                       ` Zi Yan
2025-11-21 16:50                         ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-21 17:00                           ` Zi Yan
2025-11-21 18:39                             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-11-21 19:09                               ` Zi Yan
2025-11-21 19:15                                 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251121103945.13934959041672e76dd34ecb@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.