From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: use fsverity_verify_blocks() instead of fsverity_verify_page()
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 20:11:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260215041144.GA2872@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZE_rKsOAgYqTjZ_@casper.infradead.org>
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 03:38:20AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 01:50:08PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 01:18:29PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> > > @@ -1811,15 +1811,19 @@ static void f2fs_verify_cluster(struct work_struct *work)
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > /* Verify, update, and unlock the decompressed pages. */
> > > for (i = 0; i < dic->cluster_size; i++) {
> > > struct page *rpage = dic->rpages[i];
> > > + struct folio *rfolio;
> > > + size_t offset;
> > >
> > > if (!rpage)
> > > continue;
> > > + rfolio = page_folio(rpage);
> > > + offset = folio_page_idx(rfolio, rpage) * PAGE_SIZE;
> > >
> > > - if (fsverity_verify_page(dic->vi, rpage))
> > > + if (fsverity_verify_blocks(dic->vi, rfolio, PAGE_SIZE, offset))
> > > SetPageUptodate(rpage);
>
> Yeah, no.
>
> if (fsverity_verify_blocks(dic->vi, rfolio,
> folio_size(rfolio), 0));
> folio_mark_uptodate(rfolio);
>
> > > else
> > > ClearPageUptodate(rpage);
>
> This never needed to be here. The folio must already be !uptodate.
> Just delete these two lines.
>
> > > unlock_page(rpage);
>
> folio_unlock(rfolio);
Sure. This kind of scope creep is why I wanted to just do the
straightforward conversion for now.
- Eric
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: use fsverity_verify_blocks() instead of fsverity_verify_page()
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 20:11:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260215041144.GA2872@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZE_rKsOAgYqTjZ_@casper.infradead.org>
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 03:38:20AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 01:50:08PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 01:18:29PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> > > @@ -1811,15 +1811,19 @@ static void f2fs_verify_cluster(struct work_struct *work)
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > /* Verify, update, and unlock the decompressed pages. */
> > > for (i = 0; i < dic->cluster_size; i++) {
> > > struct page *rpage = dic->rpages[i];
> > > + struct folio *rfolio;
> > > + size_t offset;
> > >
> > > if (!rpage)
> > > continue;
> > > + rfolio = page_folio(rpage);
> > > + offset = folio_page_idx(rfolio, rpage) * PAGE_SIZE;
> > >
> > > - if (fsverity_verify_page(dic->vi, rpage))
> > > + if (fsverity_verify_blocks(dic->vi, rfolio, PAGE_SIZE, offset))
> > > SetPageUptodate(rpage);
>
> Yeah, no.
>
> if (fsverity_verify_blocks(dic->vi, rfolio,
> folio_size(rfolio), 0));
> folio_mark_uptodate(rfolio);
>
> > > else
> > > ClearPageUptodate(rpage);
>
> This never needed to be here. The folio must already be !uptodate.
> Just delete these two lines.
>
> > > unlock_page(rpage);
>
> folio_unlock(rfolio);
Sure. This kind of scope creep is why I wanted to just do the
straightforward conversion for now.
- Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-15 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-14 21:18 [PATCH v2 0/2] fsverity: remove fsverity_verify_page() Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 21:18 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-14 21:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: use fsverity_verify_blocks() instead of fsverity_verify_page() Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 21:18 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-14 21:50 ` Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 21:50 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-14 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-14 22:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2026-02-15 3:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-15 3:38 ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-15 4:11 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-02-15 4:11 ` Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-14 21:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fsverity: remove fsverity_verify_page() Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 21:18 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260215041144.GA2872@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.