From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
Tobias Heider <tobias.heider@canonical.com>,
Ziyue Zhang <ziyue.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
konradybcio@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
kwilczynski@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
johan+linaro@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, abel.vesa@linaro.org, kw@linux.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com,
quic_krichai@quicinc.com, quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PCIe PERST and Wake GPIOs to port nodes
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:17:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327141756.GA1381857@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAARv3RRqXxNePX=4RqnLu7OnfjQmStynsL9RCNY19EKQOTcnLQ@mail.gmail.com>
[->to: Bjorn A.]
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 08:14:39PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 7:07 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 02:50:37PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 6:39 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 09:42:56PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 08:50:12AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 09:53:33PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 07:50:50PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 11:45:42AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 05:46:18PM +0800, Ziyue Zhang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Commit 960609b22be5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake
> > > > > > > > > > GPIOs to PCIe port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports") did not
> > > > > > > > > > convert all Hamoa‑based platforms to the new method of defining PERST and
> > > > > > > > > > Wake GPIOs in the PCIe root port nodes.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Without the change PCIe probe will fail. The probe failure happens because
> > > > > > > > > > the PHY stays in the controller node while the PERST/Wake GPIOs were moved
> > > > > > > > > > to the port nodes.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This fixes probe failures seen on the following platforms:
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-hp-omnibook-x14
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-microsoft-denali
> > > > > > > > > > - x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x
> > > > > > > > > > - x1e80100-medion-sprchrgd-14-s1
> > > > > > > > > > - x1p42100-lenovo-thinkbook-16
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-asus-zenbook-a14
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-crd
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-dell-thena
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 960609b22be5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake GPIOs to PCIe port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports")
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Are you saying that DTs in the field broke because of some kernel
> > > > > > > > > change? That's not supposed to happen. Even though PHY, PERST, and
> > > > > > > > > Wake GPIOs should be described in Root Port nodes instead of the Root
> > > > > > > > > Complex node in *future* DTs, the kernel is still supposed to accept
> > > > > > > > > the old style with them described in the Root Complex node.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is not related to the driver change. The driver correctly parses all Root
> > > > > > > > Port properties either in the Root Complex node (old binding) or Root Port node
> > > > > > > > (new binding). But commit 960609b22be5, left converting mentioned board DTS to
> > > > > > > > the new binding, leaving those affected platforms in a half baked state i.e.,
> > > > > > > > some properties in RC node and some in Root Port node. Driver cannot parse such
> > > > > > > > combinations, so it fails correctly so.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you saying that above listed machines has broken PCIe support in
> > > > > > > v7.0-rc?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I haven't verified it, but I'm pretty sure PCIe is broken on these platforms.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In line with Bjorn's request, we shouldn't have to guess.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > It seems this is a (partial) revert of 960609b22be5, is this actually
> > > > > > > fixing that change, or is it only applicable once some other changes are
> > > > > > > applied?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This change is fixing the issue in the respective board DTS and is a standalone
> > > > > > fix on top of v7.0-rc1.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So 960609b22be5 was broken when I merged it?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Broken on the machines mentioned in the commit message, not for all Hamoa
> > > > platforms.
> > > >
> > > > > The commit message says that the commit was incomplete, in that it
> > > > > didn't fully convert from the old to the new style, so it sounds like
> > > > > the offending commit was incomplete - but I believe the offending commit
> > > > > was a workaround for the new solution not being in place and this commit
> > > > > mostly reverts the changes in the offending commit.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > So 960609b22be5 was supposed to move all the platforms from old PCIe binding to
> > > > new for greater good, but it apparently decided to do so only for a subset of
> > > > the platforms for some reason which don't know. But the problem arises due to
> > > > 960609b22be5 changing the hamoa.dtsi to the new binding which also warrants the
> > > > platform DTS to also be changed to the new binding. If we only have either dtsi
> > > > or dts converted and not both to the new binding, the driver will get confused
> > > > and fail. And this is what exactly happended for below machines:
> > > >
> > > > - x1-hp-omnibook-x14
> > > > - x1-microsoft-denali
> > > > - x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x
> > > > - x1e80100-medion-sprchrgd-14-s1
> > > > - x1p42100-lenovo-thinkbook-16
> > > > - x1-asus-zenbook-a14
> > > > - x1-crd
> > > > - x1-dell-thena
> > >
> > > I can confirm the breakage for (some of) the listed devices on Ubuntu.
> > > We are experimenting with 7.0-rcs ahead of our 26.04 release.
> > >
> > > I'll try to collect some test feedback for the fix.
> > > I'd certainly appreciate this being included as an rc fix since
> > > currently half of
> > > the x1 laptop devices are broken.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the report. We will try to get this patch into v7.0-rcS.
> >
> > It'd be appreciated if you can test this patch and give your tested-by tag.
> >
> > - Mani
>
> Thank you!
>
> Tested it myself and I have rolled this out to my ubuntu-concept testing repo.
> I have tested the CRD and got user feedback that it works on at least an
> Omnibook (where we first saw the regression without the patch) and Lenovo Yoga.
> Potentially more but not everyone provides feedback when things don't break.
>
> Tested-by: Tobias Heider <tobias.heider@canonical.com>
I don't see this patch upstream yet. It's a fix for 960609b22be5
("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake GPIOs to PCIe
port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports"), which looks like
it was merged by Bjorn A., so I assume the fix will go the same route?
Just want to make sure it's not waiting on me :)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
Tobias Heider <tobias.heider@canonical.com>,
Ziyue Zhang <ziyue.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
konradybcio@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
kwilczynski@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
johan+linaro@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, abel.vesa@linaro.org, kw@linux.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com,
quic_krichai@quicinc.com, quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PCIe PERST and Wake GPIOs to port nodes
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:17:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260327141756.GA1381857@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAARv3RRqXxNePX=4RqnLu7OnfjQmStynsL9RCNY19EKQOTcnLQ@mail.gmail.com>
[->to: Bjorn A.]
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 08:14:39PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 7:07 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 02:50:37PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 6:39 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 09:42:56PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 08:50:12AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 09:53:33PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 07:50:50PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 11:45:42AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 05:46:18PM +0800, Ziyue Zhang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Commit 960609b22be5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake
> > > > > > > > > > GPIOs to PCIe port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports") did not
> > > > > > > > > > convert all Hamoa‑based platforms to the new method of defining PERST and
> > > > > > > > > > Wake GPIOs in the PCIe root port nodes.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Without the change PCIe probe will fail. The probe failure happens because
> > > > > > > > > > the PHY stays in the controller node while the PERST/Wake GPIOs were moved
> > > > > > > > > > to the port nodes.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This fixes probe failures seen on the following platforms:
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-hp-omnibook-x14
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-microsoft-denali
> > > > > > > > > > - x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x
> > > > > > > > > > - x1e80100-medion-sprchrgd-14-s1
> > > > > > > > > > - x1p42100-lenovo-thinkbook-16
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-asus-zenbook-a14
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-crd
> > > > > > > > > > - x1-dell-thena
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 960609b22be5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake GPIOs to PCIe port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports")
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Are you saying that DTs in the field broke because of some kernel
> > > > > > > > > change? That's not supposed to happen. Even though PHY, PERST, and
> > > > > > > > > Wake GPIOs should be described in Root Port nodes instead of the Root
> > > > > > > > > Complex node in *future* DTs, the kernel is still supposed to accept
> > > > > > > > > the old style with them described in the Root Complex node.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is not related to the driver change. The driver correctly parses all Root
> > > > > > > > Port properties either in the Root Complex node (old binding) or Root Port node
> > > > > > > > (new binding). But commit 960609b22be5, left converting mentioned board DTS to
> > > > > > > > the new binding, leaving those affected platforms in a half baked state i.e.,
> > > > > > > > some properties in RC node and some in Root Port node. Driver cannot parse such
> > > > > > > > combinations, so it fails correctly so.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Are you saying that above listed machines has broken PCIe support in
> > > > > > > v7.0-rc?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I haven't verified it, but I'm pretty sure PCIe is broken on these platforms.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In line with Bjorn's request, we shouldn't have to guess.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > It seems this is a (partial) revert of 960609b22be5, is this actually
> > > > > > > fixing that change, or is it only applicable once some other changes are
> > > > > > > applied?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This change is fixing the issue in the respective board DTS and is a standalone
> > > > > > fix on top of v7.0-rc1.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So 960609b22be5 was broken when I merged it?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Broken on the machines mentioned in the commit message, not for all Hamoa
> > > > platforms.
> > > >
> > > > > The commit message says that the commit was incomplete, in that it
> > > > > didn't fully convert from the old to the new style, so it sounds like
> > > > > the offending commit was incomplete - but I believe the offending commit
> > > > > was a workaround for the new solution not being in place and this commit
> > > > > mostly reverts the changes in the offending commit.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > So 960609b22be5 was supposed to move all the platforms from old PCIe binding to
> > > > new for greater good, but it apparently decided to do so only for a subset of
> > > > the platforms for some reason which don't know. But the problem arises due to
> > > > 960609b22be5 changing the hamoa.dtsi to the new binding which also warrants the
> > > > platform DTS to also be changed to the new binding. If we only have either dtsi
> > > > or dts converted and not both to the new binding, the driver will get confused
> > > > and fail. And this is what exactly happended for below machines:
> > > >
> > > > - x1-hp-omnibook-x14
> > > > - x1-microsoft-denali
> > > > - x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x
> > > > - x1e80100-medion-sprchrgd-14-s1
> > > > - x1p42100-lenovo-thinkbook-16
> > > > - x1-asus-zenbook-a14
> > > > - x1-crd
> > > > - x1-dell-thena
> > >
> > > I can confirm the breakage for (some of) the listed devices on Ubuntu.
> > > We are experimenting with 7.0-rcs ahead of our 26.04 release.
> > >
> > > I'll try to collect some test feedback for the fix.
> > > I'd certainly appreciate this being included as an rc fix since
> > > currently half of
> > > the x1 laptop devices are broken.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the report. We will try to get this patch into v7.0-rcS.
> >
> > It'd be appreciated if you can test this patch and give your tested-by tag.
> >
> > - Mani
>
> Thank you!
>
> Tested it myself and I have rolled this out to my ubuntu-concept testing repo.
> I have tested the CRD and got user feedback that it works on at least an
> Omnibook (where we first saw the regression without the patch) and Lenovo Yoga.
> Potentially more but not everyone provides feedback when things don't break.
>
> Tested-by: Tobias Heider <tobias.heider@canonical.com>
I don't see this patch upstream yet. It's a fix for 960609b22be5
("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake GPIOs to PCIe
port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports"), which looks like
it was merged by Bjorn A., so I assume the fix will go the same route?
Just want to make sure it's not waiting on me :)
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-27 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 9:46 [PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PCIe PERST and Wake GPIOs to port nodes Ziyue Zhang
2026-03-13 9:46 ` Ziyue Zhang
2026-03-13 16:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-13 16:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-14 14:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-14 14:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-16 2:53 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-03-16 2:53 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-03-16 3:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-16 3:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 2:42 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-03-19 2:42 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-03-19 5:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 5:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 13:50 ` Tobias Heider
2026-03-19 13:50 ` Tobias Heider
2026-03-24 6:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-24 6:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-24 19:14 ` Tobias Heider
2026-03-24 19:14 ` Tobias Heider
2026-03-27 14:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-03-27 14:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-27 16:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-27 16:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-17 17:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-17 17:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-19 5:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 5:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 13:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-19 13:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-19 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-19 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-24 5:59 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-24 5:59 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-16 11:16 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-16 11:16 ` Konrad Dybcio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260327141756.GA1381857@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tobias.heider@canonical.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=ziyue.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.